Cargando…
The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment
BACKGROUND: On the 1st of May 2018 Scotland became the first country to introduce minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol sales. The objective of this study is to identify the effects of this policy instrument on food purchasing by evaluating a natural experiment. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis compa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101174 |
_version_ | 1784753317372493824 |
---|---|
author | Kopasker, Daniel Whybrow, Stephen McKenzie, Lynda McNamee, Paul Ludbrook, Anne |
author_facet | Kopasker, Daniel Whybrow, Stephen McKenzie, Lynda McNamee, Paul Ludbrook, Anne |
author_sort | Kopasker, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: On the 1st of May 2018 Scotland became the first country to introduce minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol sales. The objective of this study is to identify the effects of this policy instrument on food purchasing by evaluating a natural experiment. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis compares regions with similar characteristics but differing exposure to MUP (Scotland and the north of England). Secondary data from the Kantar Worldpanel on itemised purchases between April 2017 and April 2019 provided a total sample of 8051 households. The outcomes analysed are weekly household expenditure (£s) and purchase volume (grams), both overall and disaggregated to 16 product categories. RESULTS: Following the introduction of MUP, total household food expenditure in Scotland declined by 1.0%, 95%CI [-1.9%, −0.0%], and total food volume declined by 0.8%, 95%CI [-1.7%, 0.2%] compared to the north of England. There is variation in response between product categories, with less spending on fruit and vegetables and increased spending on crisps and snacks. CONCLUSION: Minimum unit pricing for alcohol has displaced some household food purchasing and the pattern of changes in food categories appears to be less desirable from a healthy diet perspective. However, changes caused by a minimum price at a nominal 50 pence per unit of alcohol are relatively small. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9310105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93101052022-07-26 The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment Kopasker, Daniel Whybrow, Stephen McKenzie, Lynda McNamee, Paul Ludbrook, Anne SSM Popul Health Review Article BACKGROUND: On the 1st of May 2018 Scotland became the first country to introduce minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol sales. The objective of this study is to identify the effects of this policy instrument on food purchasing by evaluating a natural experiment. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis compares regions with similar characteristics but differing exposure to MUP (Scotland and the north of England). Secondary data from the Kantar Worldpanel on itemised purchases between April 2017 and April 2019 provided a total sample of 8051 households. The outcomes analysed are weekly household expenditure (£s) and purchase volume (grams), both overall and disaggregated to 16 product categories. RESULTS: Following the introduction of MUP, total household food expenditure in Scotland declined by 1.0%, 95%CI [-1.9%, −0.0%], and total food volume declined by 0.8%, 95%CI [-1.7%, 0.2%] compared to the north of England. There is variation in response between product categories, with less spending on fruit and vegetables and increased spending on crisps and snacks. CONCLUSION: Minimum unit pricing for alcohol has displaced some household food purchasing and the pattern of changes in food categories appears to be less desirable from a healthy diet perspective. However, changes caused by a minimum price at a nominal 50 pence per unit of alcohol are relatively small. Elsevier 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9310105/ /pubmed/35898560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101174 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Kopasker, Daniel Whybrow, Stephen McKenzie, Lynda McNamee, Paul Ludbrook, Anne The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment |
title | The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment |
title_full | The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment |
title_fullStr | The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment |
title_short | The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment |
title_sort | effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: evaluation of a natural experiment |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kopaskerdaniel theeffectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT whybrowstephen theeffectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT mckenzielynda theeffectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT mcnameepaul theeffectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT ludbrookanne theeffectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT kopaskerdaniel effectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT whybrowstephen effectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT mckenzielynda effectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT mcnameepaul effectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment AT ludbrookanne effectsofminimumunitpricingforalcoholonfoodpurchasesevaluationofanaturalexperiment |