Cargando…
Are Assigned Low-Dose-Radiation Cancer Risks Based on Some Epidemiologic Studies Unreliable?
Autor principal: | Scott, Bobby R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258221117049 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Some Epidemiologic Studies of Low-Dose-Radiation Cancer Risks Are Misinforming
por: Scott, Bobby R.
Publicado: (2021) -
Vanishing by Design of Cancer Risk Uncertainty for Low Radiation Doses Is Misleading and Unscientific
por: Scott, Bobby R.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Linear-No-Threshold Line for Cancer Excess Relative Risk Based on Lagging Low Radiation Doses is Misleading
por: Scott, Bobby R.
Publicado: (2021) -
Letter to the editor regarding the article ‘EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?’
por: Kass, George E. N., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Use of a Spin Strategy Can Result in Unreliable Research Findings
por: Okumura, Yasuyuki
Publicado: (2017)