Cargando…

Effect of Time After Injury on Tibiofemoral Joint Kinematics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Deficient Knees During Gait

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can lead to changes in tibiofemoral kinematics during gait, but the detailed short-term kinematic changes after ACL injury are still unknown. PURPOSE: To measure tibiofemoral kinematics during gait in ACL-deficient (ACLD) knees over time after ACL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Changzhao, Lin, Yulin, Kernkamp, Willem A., Xia, Hong, Lin, Zefeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35898201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221110160
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can lead to changes in tibiofemoral kinematics during gait, but the detailed short-term kinematic changes after ACL injury are still unknown. PURPOSE: To measure tibiofemoral kinematics during gait in ACL-deficient (ACLD) knees over time after ACL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: The authors categorized 76 patients with unilateral ACLD knees into 4 groups based on the time from injury: <3 months (group 1), 3 to 6 months (group 2), >6 to 12 months (group 3), and >12 months (group 4). The controls were 20 participants with ACL-intact knees. Changes in the knee kinematics and range of motion during gait were compared among ACLD groups and those with ACL-intact knees. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the range of motion of flexion in group 1 was significantly lower (6°; P = .033), and the mean knee flexion was significantly increased (0.7°-3.4°) in groups 1 to 4 (all P ≤ .004). There was more internal tibial rotation (2.9°-4.3°) in group 1 and 2, and more anterior tibial translation (4.3 mm) in group 1 during the stance or swing phases than in controls (P ≤ .049 for all). The mean internal tibial rotation and anterior tibial translation significantly decreased from group 1 to group 4 (P < .001 for both). Compared with controls, the mean medial tibial translation was significantly greater (1.2-2.5 mm) in all groups, and more medial tibial translations (2.4-3.7 mm) were observed during the stance phase in groups 1, 3, and 4 (P ≤ .047 for all). CONCLUSION: ACLD knees displayed a motion impairment walking strategy within 3 months, and a higher-flexion walking strategy increased with time after injury. Excessive anterior translation and internal rotation of the tibia tended to return to normal, while excessive medial translation of the tibia increased in ACLD knees after 6 months postinjury. These results may provide new insight into the compensatory mechanisms and risk factors for premature osteoarthritis in ACLD knees.