Cargando…

Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China

Considerable improvements have been made to gene editing technology, which has been increasingly applied to research involving humans. Nevertheless, human heritable germline genome editing is associated with a series of potential ethical, legal, and social risks, which have generated major controver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Yaojin, Lv, Jianwei, Ding, Lulu, Gong, Xia, Zhou, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac114
_version_ 1784753399352262656
author Peng, Yaojin
Lv, Jianwei
Ding, Lulu
Gong, Xia
Zhou, Qi
author_facet Peng, Yaojin
Lv, Jianwei
Ding, Lulu
Gong, Xia
Zhou, Qi
author_sort Peng, Yaojin
collection PubMed
description Considerable improvements have been made to gene editing technology, which has been increasingly applied to research involving humans. Nevertheless, human heritable germline genome editing is associated with a series of potential ethical, legal, and social risks, which have generated major controversies and discussions worldwide, especially after the “gene-edited babies” incident. Influenced by this incident, China has realized the importance of ethical governance in the field of life science and technology, has accelerated legislative and policy efforts in this field, and has gradually moved toward the direction of “precautionary” ethical governance. Black letter analysis, big data public opinion analysis, and other research methods are used in this paper. This paper explores the scientific background, ethical debates, and latest developments regarding China’s regulatory framework for human germline gene editing after the “gene-edited babies” controversy and provides several recommendations on the future governance system of human germline gene editing in China. This paper argues that in recent years, the ethics governance of germline genome editing in China has been accelerated and great changes have been made. However, the regulatory system for germline genome editing requires further improvement in three aspects: coordination of legislation and agencies, establishment of an ethics review system at high levels, and public participation and education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9310509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93105092022-07-26 Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China Peng, Yaojin Lv, Jianwei Ding, Lulu Gong, Xia Zhou, Qi Biol Reprod China Special Issue Considerable improvements have been made to gene editing technology, which has been increasingly applied to research involving humans. Nevertheless, human heritable germline genome editing is associated with a series of potential ethical, legal, and social risks, which have generated major controversies and discussions worldwide, especially after the “gene-edited babies” incident. Influenced by this incident, China has realized the importance of ethical governance in the field of life science and technology, has accelerated legislative and policy efforts in this field, and has gradually moved toward the direction of “precautionary” ethical governance. Black letter analysis, big data public opinion analysis, and other research methods are used in this paper. This paper explores the scientific background, ethical debates, and latest developments regarding China’s regulatory framework for human germline gene editing after the “gene-edited babies” controversy and provides several recommendations on the future governance system of human germline gene editing in China. This paper argues that in recent years, the ethics governance of germline genome editing in China has been accelerated and great changes have been made. However, the regulatory system for germline genome editing requires further improvement in three aspects: coordination of legislation and agencies, establishment of an ethics review system at high levels, and public participation and education. Oxford University Press 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9310509/ /pubmed/35640230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac114 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle China Special Issue
Peng, Yaojin
Lv, Jianwei
Ding, Lulu
Gong, Xia
Zhou, Qi
Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China
title Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China
title_full Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China
title_fullStr Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China
title_full_unstemmed Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China
title_short Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China
title_sort responsible governance of human germline genome editing in china
topic China Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac114
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyaojin responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina
AT lvjianwei responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina
AT dinglulu responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina
AT gongxia responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina
AT zhouqi responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina