Cargando…
Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China
Considerable improvements have been made to gene editing technology, which has been increasingly applied to research involving humans. Nevertheless, human heritable germline genome editing is associated with a series of potential ethical, legal, and social risks, which have generated major controver...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac114 |
_version_ | 1784753399352262656 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Yaojin Lv, Jianwei Ding, Lulu Gong, Xia Zhou, Qi |
author_facet | Peng, Yaojin Lv, Jianwei Ding, Lulu Gong, Xia Zhou, Qi |
author_sort | Peng, Yaojin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Considerable improvements have been made to gene editing technology, which has been increasingly applied to research involving humans. Nevertheless, human heritable germline genome editing is associated with a series of potential ethical, legal, and social risks, which have generated major controversies and discussions worldwide, especially after the “gene-edited babies” incident. Influenced by this incident, China has realized the importance of ethical governance in the field of life science and technology, has accelerated legislative and policy efforts in this field, and has gradually moved toward the direction of “precautionary” ethical governance. Black letter analysis, big data public opinion analysis, and other research methods are used in this paper. This paper explores the scientific background, ethical debates, and latest developments regarding China’s regulatory framework for human germline gene editing after the “gene-edited babies” controversy and provides several recommendations on the future governance system of human germline gene editing in China. This paper argues that in recent years, the ethics governance of germline genome editing in China has been accelerated and great changes have been made. However, the regulatory system for germline genome editing requires further improvement in three aspects: coordination of legislation and agencies, establishment of an ethics review system at high levels, and public participation and education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9310509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93105092022-07-26 Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China Peng, Yaojin Lv, Jianwei Ding, Lulu Gong, Xia Zhou, Qi Biol Reprod China Special Issue Considerable improvements have been made to gene editing technology, which has been increasingly applied to research involving humans. Nevertheless, human heritable germline genome editing is associated with a series of potential ethical, legal, and social risks, which have generated major controversies and discussions worldwide, especially after the “gene-edited babies” incident. Influenced by this incident, China has realized the importance of ethical governance in the field of life science and technology, has accelerated legislative and policy efforts in this field, and has gradually moved toward the direction of “precautionary” ethical governance. Black letter analysis, big data public opinion analysis, and other research methods are used in this paper. This paper explores the scientific background, ethical debates, and latest developments regarding China’s regulatory framework for human germline gene editing after the “gene-edited babies” controversy and provides several recommendations on the future governance system of human germline gene editing in China. This paper argues that in recent years, the ethics governance of germline genome editing in China has been accelerated and great changes have been made. However, the regulatory system for germline genome editing requires further improvement in three aspects: coordination of legislation and agencies, establishment of an ethics review system at high levels, and public participation and education. Oxford University Press 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9310509/ /pubmed/35640230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac114 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | China Special Issue Peng, Yaojin Lv, Jianwei Ding, Lulu Gong, Xia Zhou, Qi Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China |
title | Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China |
title_full | Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China |
title_fullStr | Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China |
title_short | Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China |
title_sort | responsible governance of human germline genome editing in china |
topic | China Special Issue |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengyaojin responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina AT lvjianwei responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina AT dinglulu responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina AT gongxia responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina AT zhouqi responsiblegovernanceofhumangermlinegenomeeditinginchina |