Cargando…

Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The number of men entering obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) residencies and general Ob/Gyn practice is decreasing. Gender biases against their participation may affect career decisions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines: (i) female patients’ gender preferences and perceptions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Brian T., Streeter, Laer H., Reddy, Ravali A., Douglas, Christopher R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13511
_version_ 1784753411320709120
author Nguyen, Brian T.
Streeter, Laer H.
Reddy, Ravali A.
Douglas, Christopher R.
author_facet Nguyen, Brian T.
Streeter, Laer H.
Reddy, Ravali A.
Douglas, Christopher R.
author_sort Nguyen, Brian T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of men entering obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) residencies and general Ob/Gyn practice is decreasing. Gender biases against their participation may affect career decisions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines: (i) female patients’ gender preferences and perceptions of men as Ob/Gyns and/or medical students; and (ii) the influence of gender on students’ education and career decisions. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified relevant research via PubMed using variations of three concepts in combination: Ob/Gyn care, gender bias/preference, and medical education or career. We conducted the initial review in 2018 and repeated the search in March 2021, adding additional references via citation review of included research. SELECTION CRITERIA: We restricted the review to original research from the United States between 2000–2021. DATA COLLECTION: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, categorised into three groups: (i) patient’s gender preference for Ob/Gyns; (ii) patient’s gender preference for medical students during the Ob/Gyn clerkship; and (iii) influence of gender bias on Ob/Gyn career decisions. MAIN RESULTS: Patients prioritised their physician’s care attributes (eg technical skill, compassion, experience) over gender when choosing Ob/Gyns; however, provider gender was prioritised for medical students. Male medical students more commonly reported exclusion from clinical opportunities, although objective clinical exposure was like that of female counterparts. Despite perceived gender bias, male medical students reported increased Ob/Gyn interest post‐clerkship; interest did not translate into residency applications. These findings are limited by study quality and heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Real and perceived gender bias among female patients and male medical students in Ob/Gyn may underlie declining numbers of men entering the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9310565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93105652022-07-29 Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review Nguyen, Brian T. Streeter, Laer H. Reddy, Ravali A. Douglas, Christopher R. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Reviews BACKGROUND: The number of men entering obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) residencies and general Ob/Gyn practice is decreasing. Gender biases against their participation may affect career decisions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines: (i) female patients’ gender preferences and perceptions of men as Ob/Gyns and/or medical students; and (ii) the influence of gender on students’ education and career decisions. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified relevant research via PubMed using variations of three concepts in combination: Ob/Gyn care, gender bias/preference, and medical education or career. We conducted the initial review in 2018 and repeated the search in March 2021, adding additional references via citation review of included research. SELECTION CRITERIA: We restricted the review to original research from the United States between 2000–2021. DATA COLLECTION: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, categorised into three groups: (i) patient’s gender preference for Ob/Gyns; (ii) patient’s gender preference for medical students during the Ob/Gyn clerkship; and (iii) influence of gender bias on Ob/Gyn career decisions. MAIN RESULTS: Patients prioritised their physician’s care attributes (eg technical skill, compassion, experience) over gender when choosing Ob/Gyns; however, provider gender was prioritised for medical students. Male medical students more commonly reported exclusion from clinical opportunities, although objective clinical exposure was like that of female counterparts. Despite perceived gender bias, male medical students reported increased Ob/Gyn interest post‐clerkship; interest did not translate into residency applications. These findings are limited by study quality and heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Real and perceived gender bias among female patients and male medical students in Ob/Gyn may underlie declining numbers of men entering the field. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-16 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9310565/ /pubmed/35293613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13511 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Nguyen, Brian T.
Streeter, Laer H.
Reddy, Ravali A.
Douglas, Christopher R.
Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review
title Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review
title_full Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review
title_fullStr Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review
title_short Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review
title_sort gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician‐gynaecologists in the united states: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13511
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenbriant genderbiasinthemedicaleducationofobstetriciangynaecologistsintheunitedstatesasystematicreview
AT streeterlaerh genderbiasinthemedicaleducationofobstetriciangynaecologistsintheunitedstatesasystematicreview
AT reddyravalia genderbiasinthemedicaleducationofobstetriciangynaecologistsintheunitedstatesasystematicreview
AT douglaschristopherr genderbiasinthemedicaleducationofobstetriciangynaecologistsintheunitedstatesasystematicreview