Cargando…

Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) persisting despite two anti‐seizures medications (ASM) and anesthetics is labeled super refractory (SRSE), correlating with important morbidity and mortality. Its treatment relies on expert opinions. Due to its pharmacological properties, ketamine (KET) has receiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caranzano, Leonardo, Novy, Jan, Rossetti, Andrea O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35274736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13610
_version_ 1784753450849927168
author Caranzano, Leonardo
Novy, Jan
Rossetti, Andrea O.
author_facet Caranzano, Leonardo
Novy, Jan
Rossetti, Andrea O.
author_sort Caranzano, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) persisting despite two anti‐seizures medications (ASM) and anesthetics is labeled super refractory (SRSE), correlating with important morbidity and mortality. Its treatment relies on expert opinions. Due to its pharmacological properties, ketamine (KET) has received increasing attention, but data are essentially retrospective. AIMS: To describe an unselected cohort of adults receiving KET for SRSE. METHODS: Analysis of a prospective registry of consecutive SE episodes, identifying SRSE patients receiving ketamine (KET). Comparison with recent adult series including more than 10 patients. RESULTS: Eleven patients received KET after a median of 4 days (range: 2–20); median dose was 5 mg/kg/h (range: 2.5–15). KET provided permanent SE control in three (27%). Previous series, using KET administration delays and doses similar to our cohort, report KET efficacy in 28–96% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lower SE control rate than existing literature, whose data are, however, often retrospective, potentially selecting patients with less severe SE forms or responding to KET. This might explain outcome differences, as KET administration modalities were comparable with our cohort. Since randomized controlled studies are lacking on this subject, the analysis of this prospective, unselected cohort, if confirmed, suggests a current overestimation of KET efficacy in SRSE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9310735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93107352022-07-29 Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry Caranzano, Leonardo Novy, Jan Rossetti, Andrea O. Acta Neurol Scand Clinical Commentary BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) persisting despite two anti‐seizures medications (ASM) and anesthetics is labeled super refractory (SRSE), correlating with important morbidity and mortality. Its treatment relies on expert opinions. Due to its pharmacological properties, ketamine (KET) has received increasing attention, but data are essentially retrospective. AIMS: To describe an unselected cohort of adults receiving KET for SRSE. METHODS: Analysis of a prospective registry of consecutive SE episodes, identifying SRSE patients receiving ketamine (KET). Comparison with recent adult series including more than 10 patients. RESULTS: Eleven patients received KET after a median of 4 days (range: 2–20); median dose was 5 mg/kg/h (range: 2.5–15). KET provided permanent SE control in three (27%). Previous series, using KET administration delays and doses similar to our cohort, report KET efficacy in 28–96% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lower SE control rate than existing literature, whose data are, however, often retrospective, potentially selecting patients with less severe SE forms or responding to KET. This might explain outcome differences, as KET administration modalities were comparable with our cohort. Since randomized controlled studies are lacking on this subject, the analysis of this prospective, unselected cohort, if confirmed, suggests a current overestimation of KET efficacy in SRSE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-11 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9310735/ /pubmed/35274736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13610 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Commentary
Caranzano, Leonardo
Novy, Jan
Rossetti, Andrea O.
Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry
title Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry
title_full Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry
title_fullStr Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry
title_full_unstemmed Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry
title_short Ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: Efficacy analysis on a prospective registry
title_sort ketamine in adult super‐refractory status epilepticus: efficacy analysis on a prospective registry
topic Clinical Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35274736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13610
work_keys_str_mv AT caranzanoleonardo ketamineinadultsuperrefractorystatusepilepticusefficacyanalysisonaprospectiveregistry
AT novyjan ketamineinadultsuperrefractorystatusepilepticusefficacyanalysisonaprospectiveregistry
AT rossettiandreao ketamineinadultsuperrefractorystatusepilepticusefficacyanalysisonaprospectiveregistry