Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation

BACKGROUND: An important complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation is the development of hematoma and device infection. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and cosmetic outcomes following CIED implantation. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rojas, Edward, Morgaenko, Katerina, Brown, Louis, Kim, Sieu, Mazimba, Sula, Malhotra, Rohit, Darby, Andrew, Monfredi, Oliver, Mason, Pamela, Mangrum, James Michael, Haines, David E., Campbell, Christopher, Bilchick, Kenneth, Mehta, Nishaki K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14454
_version_ 1784753467832664064
author Rojas, Edward
Morgaenko, Katerina
Brown, Louis
Kim, Sieu
Mazimba, Sula
Malhotra, Rohit
Darby, Andrew
Monfredi, Oliver
Mason, Pamela
Mangrum, James Michael
Haines, David E.
Campbell, Christopher
Bilchick, Kenneth
Mehta, Nishaki K.
author_facet Rojas, Edward
Morgaenko, Katerina
Brown, Louis
Kim, Sieu
Mazimba, Sula
Malhotra, Rohit
Darby, Andrew
Monfredi, Oliver
Mason, Pamela
Mangrum, James Michael
Haines, David E.
Campbell, Christopher
Bilchick, Kenneth
Mehta, Nishaki K.
author_sort Rojas, Edward
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An important complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation is the development of hematoma and device infection. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and cosmetic outcomes following CIED implantation. METHODS: An open, prospective, randomized, single‐center clinical trial was performed in patients undergoing CIED implantation. Patients were randomized to receive a novel mechanical compression device (PressRite, PR) or to receive the standard of care post device implantation. Skin pliability was measured with a calibrated durometer; the surgical site was evaluated using the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) by a blinded plastic surgeon and the Patient and Observer Scar Scale (POSAS). Performance of PR was assessed through pressure measurements, standardized scar scales and tolerability. RESULTS: From the total of 114 patients evaluated for enrollment, 105 patients were eligible for analysis. Fifty‐one patients were randomized to management group (PR) and 54 to the control group. No patients required early removal or experienced adverse effects from PR application. There were 11 hematomas (14.8% vs. 5.9% in the control and PR group respectively, p = NS). The control group had higher post procedure durometer readings in the surgical site when compared with the PR group (7.50 ± 3.45 vs. 5.37 ± 2.78; p = < .01). There were lower MSS scores in the PR group after 2 weeks (p = .03). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the safety of PR application and removal. In addition, PR appears to improve postoperative skin pliability, which could facilitate wound healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9310802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93108022022-07-29 Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation Rojas, Edward Morgaenko, Katerina Brown, Louis Kim, Sieu Mazimba, Sula Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew Monfredi, Oliver Mason, Pamela Mangrum, James Michael Haines, David E. Campbell, Christopher Bilchick, Kenneth Mehta, Nishaki K. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Devices BACKGROUND: An important complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation is the development of hematoma and device infection. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and cosmetic outcomes following CIED implantation. METHODS: An open, prospective, randomized, single‐center clinical trial was performed in patients undergoing CIED implantation. Patients were randomized to receive a novel mechanical compression device (PressRite, PR) or to receive the standard of care post device implantation. Skin pliability was measured with a calibrated durometer; the surgical site was evaluated using the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) by a blinded plastic surgeon and the Patient and Observer Scar Scale (POSAS). Performance of PR was assessed through pressure measurements, standardized scar scales and tolerability. RESULTS: From the total of 114 patients evaluated for enrollment, 105 patients were eligible for analysis. Fifty‐one patients were randomized to management group (PR) and 54 to the control group. No patients required early removal or experienced adverse effects from PR application. There were 11 hematomas (14.8% vs. 5.9% in the control and PR group respectively, p = NS). The control group had higher post procedure durometer readings in the surgical site when compared with the PR group (7.50 ± 3.45 vs. 5.37 ± 2.78; p = < .01). There were lower MSS scores in the PR group after 2 weeks (p = .03). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the safety of PR application and removal. In addition, PR appears to improve postoperative skin pliability, which could facilitate wound healing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-04 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9310802/ /pubmed/35174901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14454 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Devices
Rojas, Edward
Morgaenko, Katerina
Brown, Louis
Kim, Sieu
Mazimba, Sula
Malhotra, Rohit
Darby, Andrew
Monfredi, Oliver
Mason, Pamela
Mangrum, James Michael
Haines, David E.
Campbell, Christopher
Bilchick, Kenneth
Mehta, Nishaki K.
Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation
title Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation
title_full Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation
title_short Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation
title_sort evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after cied implantation
topic Devices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9310802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14454
work_keys_str_mv AT rojasedward evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT morgaenkokaterina evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT brownlouis evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT kimsieu evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT mazimbasula evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT malhotrarohit evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT darbyandrew evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT monfredioliver evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT masonpamela evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT mangrumjamesmichael evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT hainesdavide evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT campbellchristopher evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT bilchickkenneth evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation
AT mehtanishakik evaluationofanovelmechanicalcompressiondeviceforhematomapreventionandwoundcosmesisafterciedimplantation