Cargando…

BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies

BACKGROUND: A number of mutations related to malignant melanoma (MM) have been identified, and of the mutated genes, BRAF has been found to be altered in > 50% of cases. Most of these have been BRAF V600E mutations, whereas the incidence of BRAF V600K may vary from 10% to 30%. Little is known abo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zengarini, Corrado, Mussi, Martina, Veronesi, Giulia, Alessandrini, Aurora, Lambertini, Martina, Dika, Emi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15113
_version_ 1784753554061262848
author Zengarini, Corrado
Mussi, Martina
Veronesi, Giulia
Alessandrini, Aurora
Lambertini, Martina
Dika, Emi
author_facet Zengarini, Corrado
Mussi, Martina
Veronesi, Giulia
Alessandrini, Aurora
Lambertini, Martina
Dika, Emi
author_sort Zengarini, Corrado
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of mutations related to malignant melanoma (MM) have been identified, and of the mutated genes, BRAF has been found to be altered in > 50% of cases. Most of these have been BRAF V600E mutations, whereas the incidence of BRAF V600K may vary from 10% to 30%. Little is known about the clinical prognostic correlations of BRAF V600K MMs. We evaluated the clinical and dermoscopic features, incidence, therapy response and outcomes in the medium to long term. AIM: To compare the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics, the response to systemic therapies and the prognosis among MMs with BRAF V600E and BRAF V600K mutations. METHODS: We retrieved the data of patients tested in our centre for MM from 2012 to 2015, including clinical features, dermoscopic pictures, clinical history and tumour mutations. Only patients with BRAF V600E and BRAF V600K mutations were included. Any MMs positive for BRAF V600K mutation were collected, and the number of V600K cases and their features were used to extract the same number of patients with BRAF V600E from our database using a matching method. The clinical and dermoscopic presentation, therapy response and disease progression of the two groups were then evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 132 cases of BRAF V600E‐mutated MMs were identified, and then randomized with a propensity‐score method to match the 10 retrieved cases of BRAF V600K mutation. Both groups had a nodular appearance to the tumours and an advanced disease stage, and no significant differences in dermoscopic features were highlighted. During the follow‐up period, four patients with BRAF V600K died of disease‐specific causes. Moreover, we found a higher frequency of metastasis, a faster disease progression and more rapid mortality in patients with BRAF V600K. CONCLUSION: Despite the small size of this study, the results show similar clinical and dermoscopic characteristics between V600E and V600K mutations, but compared with BRAF V600E MMs, BRAF V600K MMs seem to be less responsive to therapy and have a worse prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93111962022-07-29 BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies Zengarini, Corrado Mussi, Martina Veronesi, Giulia Alessandrini, Aurora Lambertini, Martina Dika, Emi Clin Exp Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: A number of mutations related to malignant melanoma (MM) have been identified, and of the mutated genes, BRAF has been found to be altered in > 50% of cases. Most of these have been BRAF V600E mutations, whereas the incidence of BRAF V600K may vary from 10% to 30%. Little is known about the clinical prognostic correlations of BRAF V600K MMs. We evaluated the clinical and dermoscopic features, incidence, therapy response and outcomes in the medium to long term. AIM: To compare the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics, the response to systemic therapies and the prognosis among MMs with BRAF V600E and BRAF V600K mutations. METHODS: We retrieved the data of patients tested in our centre for MM from 2012 to 2015, including clinical features, dermoscopic pictures, clinical history and tumour mutations. Only patients with BRAF V600E and BRAF V600K mutations were included. Any MMs positive for BRAF V600K mutation were collected, and the number of V600K cases and their features were used to extract the same number of patients with BRAF V600E from our database using a matching method. The clinical and dermoscopic presentation, therapy response and disease progression of the two groups were then evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 132 cases of BRAF V600E‐mutated MMs were identified, and then randomized with a propensity‐score method to match the 10 retrieved cases of BRAF V600K mutation. Both groups had a nodular appearance to the tumours and an advanced disease stage, and no significant differences in dermoscopic features were highlighted. During the follow‐up period, four patients with BRAF V600K died of disease‐specific causes. Moreover, we found a higher frequency of metastasis, a faster disease progression and more rapid mortality in patients with BRAF V600K. CONCLUSION: Despite the small size of this study, the results show similar clinical and dermoscopic characteristics between V600E and V600K mutations, but compared with BRAF V600E MMs, BRAF V600K MMs seem to be less responsive to therapy and have a worse prognosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-11 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9311196/ /pubmed/35080260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15113 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zengarini, Corrado
Mussi, Martina
Veronesi, Giulia
Alessandrini, Aurora
Lambertini, Martina
Dika, Emi
BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies
title BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies
title_full BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies
title_fullStr BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies
title_full_unstemmed BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies
title_short BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies
title_sort braf v600k vs. braf v600e: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15113
work_keys_str_mv AT zengarinicorrado brafv600kvsbrafv600eacomparisonofclinicalanddermoscopiccharacteristicsandresponsetoimmunotherapiesandtargetedtherapies
AT mussimartina brafv600kvsbrafv600eacomparisonofclinicalanddermoscopiccharacteristicsandresponsetoimmunotherapiesandtargetedtherapies
AT veronesigiulia brafv600kvsbrafv600eacomparisonofclinicalanddermoscopiccharacteristicsandresponsetoimmunotherapiesandtargetedtherapies
AT alessandriniaurora brafv600kvsbrafv600eacomparisonofclinicalanddermoscopiccharacteristicsandresponsetoimmunotherapiesandtargetedtherapies
AT lambertinimartina brafv600kvsbrafv600eacomparisonofclinicalanddermoscopiccharacteristicsandresponsetoimmunotherapiesandtargetedtherapies
AT dikaemi brafv600kvsbrafv600eacomparisonofclinicalanddermoscopiccharacteristicsandresponsetoimmunotherapiesandtargetedtherapies