Cargando…

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse

AIMS: FemiCushion (FC) is a supportive device for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but its effectiveness has not been evaluated with imaging studies. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the anatomic changes induced by FC use in patients with severe POP. METHODS: This prospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nomura, Yukiko, Okada, Yoshiyuki, Nakagawa, Chie, Kurokawa, Ippei, Shigeta, Miwa, Fujisawa, Hidefumi, Yoshimura, Yasukuni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15210
_version_ 1784753554590793728
author Nomura, Yukiko
Okada, Yoshiyuki
Nakagawa, Chie
Kurokawa, Ippei
Shigeta, Miwa
Fujisawa, Hidefumi
Yoshimura, Yasukuni
author_facet Nomura, Yukiko
Okada, Yoshiyuki
Nakagawa, Chie
Kurokawa, Ippei
Shigeta, Miwa
Fujisawa, Hidefumi
Yoshimura, Yasukuni
author_sort Nomura, Yukiko
collection PubMed
description AIMS: FemiCushion (FC) is a supportive device for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but its effectiveness has not been evaluated with imaging studies. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the anatomic changes induced by FC use in patients with severe POP. METHODS: This prospective study examined patients with stage 3 or 4 POP who underwent treatment with FC and received a diagnostic MRI. Measurements were made in the midsagittal plane at rest and during straining with and without FC. The vertical distances from the lowest points of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall (A; P), uterine cervix or vaginal stump (C), and perineal body (PB) to the Pelvic Inclination Correction System line were measured, along with the lengths of the urogenital (UGH) and levator hiatus (LH). RESULTS: Twelve patients were included in the study. The median age was 72 (range, 56–84) years. All reference points were positioned significantly higher with the FC than without the FC (median ΔA: 11 mm, p = 0.005; ΔC: 14 mm, p = 0.011; ΔP: 6 mm, p = 0.008; ΔPB: 7 mm, p = 0.002). Median UGH and LH lengths during straining were significantly shorter with the FC than without the FC (UGH: 44 mm vs. 53 mm, p = 0.002; LH: 60 vs. 65 mm, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on the use of MRI to measure the performance of FC. Our study demonstrates that FC effectively repositioned the organs involved in POP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93111982022-07-29 Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse Nomura, Yukiko Okada, Yoshiyuki Nakagawa, Chie Kurokawa, Ippei Shigeta, Miwa Fujisawa, Hidefumi Yoshimura, Yasukuni J Obstet Gynaecol Res Original Articles AIMS: FemiCushion (FC) is a supportive device for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but its effectiveness has not been evaluated with imaging studies. This study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the anatomic changes induced by FC use in patients with severe POP. METHODS: This prospective study examined patients with stage 3 or 4 POP who underwent treatment with FC and received a diagnostic MRI. Measurements were made in the midsagittal plane at rest and during straining with and without FC. The vertical distances from the lowest points of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall (A; P), uterine cervix or vaginal stump (C), and perineal body (PB) to the Pelvic Inclination Correction System line were measured, along with the lengths of the urogenital (UGH) and levator hiatus (LH). RESULTS: Twelve patients were included in the study. The median age was 72 (range, 56–84) years. All reference points were positioned significantly higher with the FC than without the FC (median ΔA: 11 mm, p = 0.005; ΔC: 14 mm, p = 0.011; ΔP: 6 mm, p = 0.008; ΔPB: 7 mm, p = 0.002). Median UGH and LH lengths during straining were significantly shorter with the FC than without the FC (UGH: 44 mm vs. 53 mm, p = 0.002; LH: 60 vs. 65 mm, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on the use of MRI to measure the performance of FC. Our study demonstrates that FC effectively repositioned the organs involved in POP. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-02-28 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9311198/ /pubmed/35229411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15210 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nomura, Yukiko
Okada, Yoshiyuki
Nakagawa, Chie
Kurokawa, Ippei
Shigeta, Miwa
Fujisawa, Hidefumi
Yoshimura, Yasukuni
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse
title Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of FemiCushion in pelvic organ prolapse
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effectiveness of femicushion in pelvic organ prolapse
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.15210
work_keys_str_mv AT nomurayukiko magneticresonanceimagingevaluationoftheeffectivenessoffemicushioninpelvicorganprolapse
AT okadayoshiyuki magneticresonanceimagingevaluationoftheeffectivenessoffemicushioninpelvicorganprolapse
AT nakagawachie magneticresonanceimagingevaluationoftheeffectivenessoffemicushioninpelvicorganprolapse
AT kurokawaippei magneticresonanceimagingevaluationoftheeffectivenessoffemicushioninpelvicorganprolapse
AT shigetamiwa magneticresonanceimagingevaluationoftheeffectivenessoffemicushioninpelvicorganprolapse
AT fujisawahidefumi magneticresonanceimagingevaluationoftheeffectivenessoffemicushioninpelvicorganprolapse
AT yoshimurayasukuni magneticresonanceimagingevaluationoftheeffectivenessoffemicushioninpelvicorganprolapse