Cargando…

Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales

The Botryosphaeriales (Dothideomycetes) includes numerous endophytic, saprobic, and plant pathogenic species associated with a wide range of symptoms, most commonly on woody plants. In a recent phylogenetic treatment of 499 isolates in the culture collection (CBS) of the Westerdijk Institute, we eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, W., Groenewald, J.Z., Lombard, L., Schumacher, R.K., Phillips, A.J.L., Crous, P.W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.03
_version_ 1784753585276321792
author Zhang, W.
Groenewald, J.Z.
Lombard, L.
Schumacher, R.K.
Phillips, A.J.L.
Crous, P.W.
author_facet Zhang, W.
Groenewald, J.Z.
Lombard, L.
Schumacher, R.K.
Phillips, A.J.L.
Crous, P.W.
author_sort Zhang, W.
collection PubMed
description The Botryosphaeriales (Dothideomycetes) includes numerous endophytic, saprobic, and plant pathogenic species associated with a wide range of symptoms, most commonly on woody plants. In a recent phylogenetic treatment of 499 isolates in the culture collection (CBS) of the Westerdijk Institute, we evaluated the families and genera accommodated in this order of important fungi. The present study presents multigene phylogenetic analyses for an additional 230 isolates, using ITS, tef1, tub2, LSU and rpb2 loci, in combination with morphological data. Based on these data, 58 species are reduced to synonymy, and eight novel species are described. They include Diplodia afrocarpi (Afrocarpus, South Africa), Dothiorella diospyricola (Diospyros, South Africa), Lasiodiplodia acaciae (Acacia, Indonesia), Neofusicoccum podocarpi (Podocarpus, South Africa), N. rapaneae (Rapanea, South Africa), Phaeobotryon ulmi (Ulmus, Germany), Saccharata grevilleae (Grevillea, Australia) and S. hakeiphila (Hakea, Australia). The results have clarified the identity of numerous isolates that lacked Latin binomials or had been deposited under incorrect names in the CBS collection in the past. They also provide a solid foundation for more in-depth future studies on taxa in the order. Sequences of the tef1, tub2 and rpb2 genes proved to be the most reliable markers. At the species level, results showed that the most informative genes were inconsistent, but that a combination of four candidate barcodes (ITS, tef1, tub2 and rpb2) provided reliable resolution. Furthermore, given the large number of additional isolates included in this study, and newly generated multigene DNA datasets, several species could also be reduced to synonymy. The study illustrates the value of reassessing the identity of older collections in culture collections utilising modern taxonomic frameworks and methods. Citation: Zhang W, Groenewald JZ, Lombard L, et al. 2021. Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales. Persoonia 46: 63–115. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.03.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93113892022-08-05 Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales Zhang, W. Groenewald, J.Z. Lombard, L. Schumacher, R.K. Phillips, A.J.L. Crous, P.W. Persoonia Research Article The Botryosphaeriales (Dothideomycetes) includes numerous endophytic, saprobic, and plant pathogenic species associated with a wide range of symptoms, most commonly on woody plants. In a recent phylogenetic treatment of 499 isolates in the culture collection (CBS) of the Westerdijk Institute, we evaluated the families and genera accommodated in this order of important fungi. The present study presents multigene phylogenetic analyses for an additional 230 isolates, using ITS, tef1, tub2, LSU and rpb2 loci, in combination with morphological data. Based on these data, 58 species are reduced to synonymy, and eight novel species are described. They include Diplodia afrocarpi (Afrocarpus, South Africa), Dothiorella diospyricola (Diospyros, South Africa), Lasiodiplodia acaciae (Acacia, Indonesia), Neofusicoccum podocarpi (Podocarpus, South Africa), N. rapaneae (Rapanea, South Africa), Phaeobotryon ulmi (Ulmus, Germany), Saccharata grevilleae (Grevillea, Australia) and S. hakeiphila (Hakea, Australia). The results have clarified the identity of numerous isolates that lacked Latin binomials or had been deposited under incorrect names in the CBS collection in the past. They also provide a solid foundation for more in-depth future studies on taxa in the order. Sequences of the tef1, tub2 and rpb2 genes proved to be the most reliable markers. At the species level, results showed that the most informative genes were inconsistent, but that a combination of four candidate barcodes (ITS, tef1, tub2 and rpb2) provided reliable resolution. Furthermore, given the large number of additional isolates included in this study, and newly generated multigene DNA datasets, several species could also be reduced to synonymy. The study illustrates the value of reassessing the identity of older collections in culture collections utilising modern taxonomic frameworks and methods. Citation: Zhang W, Groenewald JZ, Lombard L, et al. 2021. Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales. Persoonia 46: 63–115. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.03. Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute 2021-02-02 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9311389/ /pubmed/35935886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.03 Text en © 2021 Naturalis Biodiversity Center & Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) . Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, W.
Groenewald, J.Z.
Lombard, L.
Schumacher, R.K.
Phillips, A.J.L.
Crous, P.W.
Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales
title Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales
title_full Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales
title_fullStr Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales
title_short Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales
title_sort evaluating species in botryosphaeriales
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.03
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangw evaluatingspeciesinbotryosphaeriales
AT groenewaldjz evaluatingspeciesinbotryosphaeriales
AT lombardl evaluatingspeciesinbotryosphaeriales
AT schumacherrk evaluatingspeciesinbotryosphaeriales
AT phillipsajl evaluatingspeciesinbotryosphaeriales
AT crouspw evaluatingspeciesinbotryosphaeriales