Cargando…

Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population

Most studies of phenotypic selection in the wild have focussed on morphological and life‐history traits and looked at abiotic (climatic) variation as the main driver of selection. Consequently, our knowledge of the effects of biotic environmental variation on phenotypic selection on sexual traits is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales‐Mata, José Ignacio, Potti, Jaime, Camacho, Carlos, Martínez‐Padilla, Jesús, Canal, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13993
_version_ 1784753588302512128
author Morales‐Mata, José Ignacio
Potti, Jaime
Camacho, Carlos
Martínez‐Padilla, Jesús
Canal, David
author_facet Morales‐Mata, José Ignacio
Potti, Jaime
Camacho, Carlos
Martínez‐Padilla, Jesús
Canal, David
author_sort Morales‐Mata, José Ignacio
collection PubMed
description Most studies of phenotypic selection in the wild have focussed on morphological and life‐history traits and looked at abiotic (climatic) variation as the main driver of selection. Consequently, our knowledge of the effects of biotic environmental variation on phenotypic selection on sexual traits is scarce. Population density can be considered a proxy for the intensity of intrasexual and intersexual competition and could therefore be a key factor influencing the covariation between individual fitness and the expression of sexual traits. Here, we used an individual‐based data set from a population of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) monitored over 24 years to analyze the effect of breeding density on phenotypic selection on dorsal plumage colouration, a heritable and sexually selected ornament in males of this species. Using the number of recruits as a fitness proxy, our results showed overall stabilizing selection on male dorsal colouration, with intermediate phenotypes being favoured over extremely dark and dull individuals. However, our results did not support the hypothesis that breeding density mediates phenotypic selection on this sexual trait. We discuss the possible role of other biotic factors influencing selection on ornamental plumage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93114032022-07-29 Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population Morales‐Mata, José Ignacio Potti, Jaime Camacho, Carlos Martínez‐Padilla, Jesús Canal, David J Evol Biol Issue Most studies of phenotypic selection in the wild have focussed on morphological and life‐history traits and looked at abiotic (climatic) variation as the main driver of selection. Consequently, our knowledge of the effects of biotic environmental variation on phenotypic selection on sexual traits is scarce. Population density can be considered a proxy for the intensity of intrasexual and intersexual competition and could therefore be a key factor influencing the covariation between individual fitness and the expression of sexual traits. Here, we used an individual‐based data set from a population of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) monitored over 24 years to analyze the effect of breeding density on phenotypic selection on dorsal plumage colouration, a heritable and sexually selected ornament in males of this species. Using the number of recruits as a fitness proxy, our results showed overall stabilizing selection on male dorsal colouration, with intermediate phenotypes being favoured over extremely dark and dull individuals. However, our results did not support the hypothesis that breeding density mediates phenotypic selection on this sexual trait. We discuss the possible role of other biotic factors influencing selection on ornamental plumage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-16 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9311403/ /pubmed/35293060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13993 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Issue
Morales‐Mata, José Ignacio
Potti, Jaime
Camacho, Carlos
Martínez‐Padilla, Jesús
Canal, David
Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population
title Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population
title_full Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population
title_fullStr Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population
title_short Phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population
title_sort phenotypic selection on an ornamental trait is not modulated by breeding density in a pied flycatcher population
topic Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13993
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesmatajoseignacio phenotypicselectiononanornamentaltraitisnotmodulatedbybreedingdensityinapiedflycatcherpopulation
AT pottijaime phenotypicselectiononanornamentaltraitisnotmodulatedbybreedingdensityinapiedflycatcherpopulation
AT camachocarlos phenotypicselectiononanornamentaltraitisnotmodulatedbybreedingdensityinapiedflycatcherpopulation
AT martinezpadillajesus phenotypicselectiononanornamentaltraitisnotmodulatedbybreedingdensityinapiedflycatcherpopulation
AT canaldavid phenotypicselectiononanornamentaltraitisnotmodulatedbybreedingdensityinapiedflycatcherpopulation