Cargando…
Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation
Skeletal muscle regeneration is one of the major areas of interest in sport medicine as well as trauma centers. Three‐dimensional (3D) bioprinting (BioP) is nowadays widely adopted to manufacture 3D constructs for regenerative medicine but a comparison between the available biomaterial‐based inks (b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.3293 |
_version_ | 1784753595940339712 |
---|---|
author | Ronzoni, Flavio L. Aliberti, Flaminia Scocozza, Franca Benedetti, Laura Auricchio, Ferdinando Sampaolesi, Maurilio Cusella, Gabriella Redwan, Itedale Namro Ceccarelli, Gabriele Conti, Michele |
author_facet | Ronzoni, Flavio L. Aliberti, Flaminia Scocozza, Franca Benedetti, Laura Auricchio, Ferdinando Sampaolesi, Maurilio Cusella, Gabriella Redwan, Itedale Namro Ceccarelli, Gabriele Conti, Michele |
author_sort | Ronzoni, Flavio L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Skeletal muscle regeneration is one of the major areas of interest in sport medicine as well as trauma centers. Three‐dimensional (3D) bioprinting (BioP) is nowadays widely adopted to manufacture 3D constructs for regenerative medicine but a comparison between the available biomaterial‐based inks (bioinks) is missing. The present study aims to assess the impact of different hydrogels on the viability, proliferation, and differentiation of murine myoblasts (C2C12) encapsulated in 3D bioprinted constructs aided to muscle regeneration. We tested three different commercially available hydrogels bioinks based on: (1) gelatin methacrylate and alginate crosslinked by UV light; (2) gelatin methacrylate, xanthan gum, and alginate‐fibrinogen; (3) nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC)/alginate‐fibrinogen crosslinked with calcium chloride and thrombin. Constructs embedding the cells were manufactured by extrusion‐based BioP and C2C12 viability, proliferation, and differentiation were assessed after 24 h, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days in culture. Although viability, proliferation, and differentiation were observed in all the constructs, among the investigated bioinks, the best results were obtained by using NFC/alginate‐fibrinogen‐based hydrogel from 7 to 14 days in culture, when the embedded myoblasts started fusing, forming at day 21 and day 28 multinucleated myotubes within the 3D bioprinted structures. The results revealed an extensive myotube alignment all over the linear structure of the hydrogel, demonstrating cell maturation, and enhanced myogenesis. The bioprinting strategies that we describe here denote a strong and endorsed approach for the creation of in vitro artificial muscle to improve skeletal muscle tissue engineering for future therapeutic applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9311434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93114342022-07-29 Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation Ronzoni, Flavio L. Aliberti, Flaminia Scocozza, Franca Benedetti, Laura Auricchio, Ferdinando Sampaolesi, Maurilio Cusella, Gabriella Redwan, Itedale Namro Ceccarelli, Gabriele Conti, Michele J Tissue Eng Regen Med Research Articles Skeletal muscle regeneration is one of the major areas of interest in sport medicine as well as trauma centers. Three‐dimensional (3D) bioprinting (BioP) is nowadays widely adopted to manufacture 3D constructs for regenerative medicine but a comparison between the available biomaterial‐based inks (bioinks) is missing. The present study aims to assess the impact of different hydrogels on the viability, proliferation, and differentiation of murine myoblasts (C2C12) encapsulated in 3D bioprinted constructs aided to muscle regeneration. We tested three different commercially available hydrogels bioinks based on: (1) gelatin methacrylate and alginate crosslinked by UV light; (2) gelatin methacrylate, xanthan gum, and alginate‐fibrinogen; (3) nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC)/alginate‐fibrinogen crosslinked with calcium chloride and thrombin. Constructs embedding the cells were manufactured by extrusion‐based BioP and C2C12 viability, proliferation, and differentiation were assessed after 24 h, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days in culture. Although viability, proliferation, and differentiation were observed in all the constructs, among the investigated bioinks, the best results were obtained by using NFC/alginate‐fibrinogen‐based hydrogel from 7 to 14 days in culture, when the embedded myoblasts started fusing, forming at day 21 and day 28 multinucleated myotubes within the 3D bioprinted structures. The results revealed an extensive myotube alignment all over the linear structure of the hydrogel, demonstrating cell maturation, and enhanced myogenesis. The bioprinting strategies that we describe here denote a strong and endorsed approach for the creation of in vitro artificial muscle to improve skeletal muscle tissue engineering for future therapeutic applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-04 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9311434/ /pubmed/35246958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.3293 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ronzoni, Flavio L. Aliberti, Flaminia Scocozza, Franca Benedetti, Laura Auricchio, Ferdinando Sampaolesi, Maurilio Cusella, Gabriella Redwan, Itedale Namro Ceccarelli, Gabriele Conti, Michele Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation |
title | Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation |
title_full | Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation |
title_fullStr | Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation |
title_full_unstemmed | Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation |
title_short | Myoblast 3D bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation |
title_sort | myoblast 3d bioprinting to burst in vitro skeletal muscle differentiation |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.3293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ronzoniflaviol myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT alibertiflaminia myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT scocozzafranca myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT benedettilaura myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT auricchioferdinando myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT sampaolesimaurilio myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT cusellagabriella myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT redwanitedalenamro myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT ceccarelligabriele myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation AT contimichele myoblast3dbioprintingtoburstinvitroskeletalmuscledifferentiation |