Cargando…
Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation
Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with a systematic framework for collecting patient data, organizing notes from the healthcare team, and managing the daily workflow in the modern era of healthcare. Despite these advantages, EHRs have proven to be problematic for clinicians....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911305 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26330 |
_version_ | 1784753607129694208 |
---|---|
author | Avendano, John P Gallagher, Daniel O Hawes, Joseph D Boyle, Joseph Glasser, Laurie Aryee, Jomar Katt, Brian M |
author_facet | Avendano, John P Gallagher, Daniel O Hawes, Joseph D Boyle, Joseph Glasser, Laurie Aryee, Jomar Katt, Brian M |
author_sort | Avendano, John P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with a systematic framework for collecting patient data, organizing notes from the healthcare team, and managing the daily workflow in the modern era of healthcare. Despite these advantages, EHRs have proven to be problematic for clinicians. The burdensome regulations requiring increased documentation with the EHR paradigm have led to inefficiencies from data-entry requirements forcing physicians to spend an inordinate amount of time on it, affecting the time available for direct patient care as well as leading to professional burnout. As a result, new modalities such as speech recognition, medical scribes, pre-made EHR templates, and digital scribes [a form of artificial intelligence (AI) based on ambient speech recognition] are increasingly being used to reduce charting time and increase the time available for patient care. The purpose of our review is to provide an up-to-date review of the literature on these modalities including their benefits and shortcomings, to help physicians and other medical professionals choose the best methods to document their patient-care encounters efficiently and effectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9311494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93114942022-07-29 Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation Avendano, John P Gallagher, Daniel O Hawes, Joseph D Boyle, Joseph Glasser, Laurie Aryee, Jomar Katt, Brian M Cureus Quality Improvement Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with a systematic framework for collecting patient data, organizing notes from the healthcare team, and managing the daily workflow in the modern era of healthcare. Despite these advantages, EHRs have proven to be problematic for clinicians. The burdensome regulations requiring increased documentation with the EHR paradigm have led to inefficiencies from data-entry requirements forcing physicians to spend an inordinate amount of time on it, affecting the time available for direct patient care as well as leading to professional burnout. As a result, new modalities such as speech recognition, medical scribes, pre-made EHR templates, and digital scribes [a form of artificial intelligence (AI) based on ambient speech recognition] are increasingly being used to reduce charting time and increase the time available for patient care. The purpose of our review is to provide an up-to-date review of the literature on these modalities including their benefits and shortcomings, to help physicians and other medical professionals choose the best methods to document their patient-care encounters efficiently and effectively. Cureus 2022-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9311494/ /pubmed/35911305 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26330 Text en Copyright © 2022, Avendano et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Avendano, John P Gallagher, Daniel O Hawes, Joseph D Boyle, Joseph Glasser, Laurie Aryee, Jomar Katt, Brian M Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation |
title | Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation |
title_full | Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation |
title_fullStr | Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation |
title_short | Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation |
title_sort | interfacing with the electronic health record (ehr): a comparative review of modes of documentation |
topic | Quality Improvement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911305 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT avendanojohnp interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation AT gallagherdanielo interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation AT hawesjosephd interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation AT boylejoseph interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation AT glasserlaurie interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation AT aryeejomar interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation AT kattbrianm interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation |