Cargando…

Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation

Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with a systematic framework for collecting patient data, organizing notes from the healthcare team, and managing the daily workflow in the modern era of healthcare. Despite these advantages, EHRs have proven to be problematic for clinicians....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avendano, John P, Gallagher, Daniel O, Hawes, Joseph D, Boyle, Joseph, Glasser, Laurie, Aryee, Jomar, Katt, Brian M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911305
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26330
_version_ 1784753607129694208
author Avendano, John P
Gallagher, Daniel O
Hawes, Joseph D
Boyle, Joseph
Glasser, Laurie
Aryee, Jomar
Katt, Brian M
author_facet Avendano, John P
Gallagher, Daniel O
Hawes, Joseph D
Boyle, Joseph
Glasser, Laurie
Aryee, Jomar
Katt, Brian M
author_sort Avendano, John P
collection PubMed
description Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with a systematic framework for collecting patient data, organizing notes from the healthcare team, and managing the daily workflow in the modern era of healthcare. Despite these advantages, EHRs have proven to be problematic for clinicians. The burdensome regulations requiring increased documentation with the EHR paradigm have led to inefficiencies from data-entry requirements forcing physicians to spend an inordinate amount of time on it, affecting the time available for direct patient care as well as leading to professional burnout. As a result, new modalities such as speech recognition, medical scribes, pre-made EHR templates, and digital scribes [a form of artificial intelligence (AI) based on ambient speech recognition] are increasingly being used to reduce charting time and increase the time available for patient care. The purpose of our review is to provide an up-to-date review of the literature on these modalities including their benefits and shortcomings, to help physicians and other medical professionals choose the best methods to document their patient-care encounters efficiently and effectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93114942022-07-29 Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation Avendano, John P Gallagher, Daniel O Hawes, Joseph D Boyle, Joseph Glasser, Laurie Aryee, Jomar Katt, Brian M Cureus Quality Improvement Electronic health records (EHRs) have provided physicians with a systematic framework for collecting patient data, organizing notes from the healthcare team, and managing the daily workflow in the modern era of healthcare. Despite these advantages, EHRs have proven to be problematic for clinicians. The burdensome regulations requiring increased documentation with the EHR paradigm have led to inefficiencies from data-entry requirements forcing physicians to spend an inordinate amount of time on it, affecting the time available for direct patient care as well as leading to professional burnout. As a result, new modalities such as speech recognition, medical scribes, pre-made EHR templates, and digital scribes [a form of artificial intelligence (AI) based on ambient speech recognition] are increasingly being used to reduce charting time and increase the time available for patient care. The purpose of our review is to provide an up-to-date review of the literature on these modalities including their benefits and shortcomings, to help physicians and other medical professionals choose the best methods to document their patient-care encounters efficiently and effectively. Cureus 2022-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9311494/ /pubmed/35911305 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26330 Text en Copyright © 2022, Avendano et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Avendano, John P
Gallagher, Daniel O
Hawes, Joseph D
Boyle, Joseph
Glasser, Laurie
Aryee, Jomar
Katt, Brian M
Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation
title Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation
title_full Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation
title_fullStr Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation
title_full_unstemmed Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation
title_short Interfacing With the Electronic Health Record (EHR): A Comparative Review of Modes of Documentation
title_sort interfacing with the electronic health record (ehr): a comparative review of modes of documentation
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911305
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26330
work_keys_str_mv AT avendanojohnp interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation
AT gallagherdanielo interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation
AT hawesjosephd interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation
AT boylejoseph interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation
AT glasserlaurie interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation
AT aryeejomar interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation
AT kattbrianm interfacingwiththeelectronichealthrecordehracomparativereviewofmodesofdocumentation