Cargando…

Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although images are more effective than words at communicating important conservation ideas, different aspects of these images have been demonstrated to have positive and negative effects on viewers’ views towards wildlife and towards the organisation that posted the image. The most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Meghan N., Borrie, William T., McLeod, Emily M., Miller, Kelly K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141787
_version_ 1784753629611163648
author Shaw, Meghan N.
Borrie, William T.
McLeod, Emily M.
Miller, Kelly K.
author_facet Shaw, Meghan N.
Borrie, William T.
McLeod, Emily M.
Miller, Kelly K.
author_sort Shaw, Meghan N.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although images are more effective than words at communicating important conservation ideas, different aspects of these images have been demonstrated to have positive and negative effects on viewers’ views towards wildlife and towards the organisation that posted the image. The most prevalent and engaging characteristics of wildlife photographs posted to Instagram in 2020 and 2021 were assessed using a quantitative content analysis, with Australian organisations as a case study. The findings show that conservation organisations can confidently share and post photographs that promote positive attitudes towards wildlife and the conservation organisation, and that Instagram posts can feature and promote a wide range of currently underrepresented species. ABSTRACT: Wildlife populations are vanishing at alarmingly high rates. This issue is being addressed by organisations around the world and when utilizing social media sites like Instagram, images are potentially more powerful than words at conveying crucial conservation messages and garnering public support. However, different elements of these images have been shown to potentially have either positive or negative effects on viewers’ attitudes and behaviours towards wildlife and towards the organisation posting the image. This study used a quantitative content analysis to assess the most common and engaging elements of wildlife images posted to Instagram in 2020 and 2021, using Australian conservation organisations as a case study. A total of 670 wildlife images from the Instagram accounts of 160 conservation organisation Instagram accounts were coded and analysed. Results highlight that the most common image elements used included natural backgrounds, mammals and birds, and no human presence. In addition, it was found that the taxon of the animal featured in a post and the presence of humans did not impact engagement levels. Our findings highlight the potential for Instagram posts to feature and promote a wide range of currently underrepresented species, and for conservation organisations to be able to confidently share and post images that promote positive perceptions of both the animal and the conservation organisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93115882022-07-26 Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images Shaw, Meghan N. Borrie, William T. McLeod, Emily M. Miller, Kelly K. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although images are more effective than words at communicating important conservation ideas, different aspects of these images have been demonstrated to have positive and negative effects on viewers’ views towards wildlife and towards the organisation that posted the image. The most prevalent and engaging characteristics of wildlife photographs posted to Instagram in 2020 and 2021 were assessed using a quantitative content analysis, with Australian organisations as a case study. The findings show that conservation organisations can confidently share and post photographs that promote positive attitudes towards wildlife and the conservation organisation, and that Instagram posts can feature and promote a wide range of currently underrepresented species. ABSTRACT: Wildlife populations are vanishing at alarmingly high rates. This issue is being addressed by organisations around the world and when utilizing social media sites like Instagram, images are potentially more powerful than words at conveying crucial conservation messages and garnering public support. However, different elements of these images have been shown to potentially have either positive or negative effects on viewers’ attitudes and behaviours towards wildlife and towards the organisation posting the image. This study used a quantitative content analysis to assess the most common and engaging elements of wildlife images posted to Instagram in 2020 and 2021, using Australian conservation organisations as a case study. A total of 670 wildlife images from the Instagram accounts of 160 conservation organisation Instagram accounts were coded and analysed. Results highlight that the most common image elements used included natural backgrounds, mammals and birds, and no human presence. In addition, it was found that the taxon of the animal featured in a post and the presence of humans did not impact engagement levels. Our findings highlight the potential for Instagram posts to feature and promote a wide range of currently underrepresented species, and for conservation organisations to be able to confidently share and post images that promote positive perceptions of both the animal and the conservation organisation. MDPI 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9311588/ /pubmed/35883335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141787 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shaw, Meghan N.
Borrie, William T.
McLeod, Emily M.
Miller, Kelly K.
Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images
title Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images
title_full Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images
title_fullStr Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images
title_full_unstemmed Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images
title_short Wildlife Photos on Social Media: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Conservation Organisations’ Instagram Images
title_sort wildlife photos on social media: a quantitative content analysis of conservation organisations’ instagram images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141787
work_keys_str_mv AT shawmeghann wildlifephotosonsocialmediaaquantitativecontentanalysisofconservationorganisationsinstagramimages
AT borriewilliamt wildlifephotosonsocialmediaaquantitativecontentanalysisofconservationorganisationsinstagramimages
AT mcleodemilym wildlifephotosonsocialmediaaquantitativecontentanalysisofconservationorganisationsinstagramimages
AT millerkellyk wildlifephotosonsocialmediaaquantitativecontentanalysisofconservationorganisationsinstagramimages