Cargando…
Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
The precursor lesion for the ~30% of colon carcinomas developing along the serrated pathway was first described in detail in 1996, and was named sessile serrated adenoma in 2003. Although the entity itself was controversial initially, over time the concept of a serrated pathway initiated by this les...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35040174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14618 |
_version_ | 1784753672117288960 |
---|---|
author | Nagtegaal, Iris D Snover, Dale C |
author_facet | Nagtegaal, Iris D Snover, Dale C |
author_sort | Nagtegaal, Iris D |
collection | PubMed |
description | The precursor lesion for the ~30% of colon carcinomas developing along the serrated pathway was first described in detail in 1996, and was named sessile serrated adenoma in 2003. Although the entity itself was controversial initially, over time the concept of a serrated pathway initiated by this lesion has become well accepted in the medical community. The name sessile serrated adenoma, however, has been controversial since the beginning and continues to be controversial. Alternative names, including serrated polyp with abnormal proliferation, sessile serrated polyp and, most recently, sessile serrated lesion, have been proposed. Despite the fact that the term sessile serrated lesion was adopted by the World Health Organization in 2019, none of these terms has received universal acceptance. In this article, arguments for and against adopting the term sessile serrated lesion are discussed in detail. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9311759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93117592022-07-30 Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? Nagtegaal, Iris D Snover, Dale C Histopathology Reviews The precursor lesion for the ~30% of colon carcinomas developing along the serrated pathway was first described in detail in 1996, and was named sessile serrated adenoma in 2003. Although the entity itself was controversial initially, over time the concept of a serrated pathway initiated by this lesion has become well accepted in the medical community. The name sessile serrated adenoma, however, has been controversial since the beginning and continues to be controversial. Alternative names, including serrated polyp with abnormal proliferation, sessile serrated polyp and, most recently, sessile serrated lesion, have been proposed. Despite the fact that the term sessile serrated lesion was adopted by the World Health Organization in 2019, none of these terms has received universal acceptance. In this article, arguments for and against adopting the term sessile serrated lesion are discussed in detail. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-03 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9311759/ /pubmed/35040174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14618 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Nagtegaal, Iris D Snover, Dale C Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? |
title | Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? |
title_full | Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? |
title_fullStr | Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? |
title_full_unstemmed | Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? |
title_short | Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? |
title_sort | head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35040174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagtegaalirisd headtoheadshouldweadoptthetermsessileserratedlesion AT snoverdalec headtoheadshouldweadoptthetermsessileserratedlesion |