Cargando…

Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?

The precursor lesion for the ~30% of colon carcinomas developing along the serrated pathway was first described in detail in 1996, and was named sessile serrated adenoma in 2003. Although the entity itself was controversial initially, over time the concept of a serrated pathway initiated by this les...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagtegaal, Iris D, Snover, Dale C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35040174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14618
_version_ 1784753672117288960
author Nagtegaal, Iris D
Snover, Dale C
author_facet Nagtegaal, Iris D
Snover, Dale C
author_sort Nagtegaal, Iris D
collection PubMed
description The precursor lesion for the ~30% of colon carcinomas developing along the serrated pathway was first described in detail in 1996, and was named sessile serrated adenoma in 2003. Although the entity itself was controversial initially, over time the concept of a serrated pathway initiated by this lesion has become well accepted in the medical community. The name sessile serrated adenoma, however, has been controversial since the beginning and continues to be controversial. Alternative names, including serrated polyp with abnormal proliferation, sessile serrated polyp and, most recently, sessile serrated lesion, have been proposed. Despite the fact that the term sessile serrated lesion was adopted by the World Health Organization in 2019, none of these terms has received universal acceptance. In this article, arguments for and against adopting the term sessile serrated lesion are discussed in detail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93117592022-07-30 Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’? Nagtegaal, Iris D Snover, Dale C Histopathology Reviews The precursor lesion for the ~30% of colon carcinomas developing along the serrated pathway was first described in detail in 1996, and was named sessile serrated adenoma in 2003. Although the entity itself was controversial initially, over time the concept of a serrated pathway initiated by this lesion has become well accepted in the medical community. The name sessile serrated adenoma, however, has been controversial since the beginning and continues to be controversial. Alternative names, including serrated polyp with abnormal proliferation, sessile serrated polyp and, most recently, sessile serrated lesion, have been proposed. Despite the fact that the term sessile serrated lesion was adopted by the World Health Organization in 2019, none of these terms has received universal acceptance. In this article, arguments for and against adopting the term sessile serrated lesion are discussed in detail. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-03 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9311759/ /pubmed/35040174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14618 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Nagtegaal, Iris D
Snover, Dale C
Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
title Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
title_full Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
title_fullStr Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
title_full_unstemmed Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
title_short Head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
title_sort head to head: should we adopt the term ‘sessile serrated lesion’?
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35040174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14618
work_keys_str_mv AT nagtegaalirisd headtoheadshouldweadoptthetermsessileserratedlesion
AT snoverdalec headtoheadshouldweadoptthetermsessileserratedlesion