Cargando…

Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Globally, tropical pasture species predominate in tropical and subtropical climates, and are the primary feed source for grazing livestock including dairy cattle. Therefore, this study aimed at systematically analysing the nutritive values of tropical pastures and the implications of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayasinghe, Priyanath, Ramilan, Thiagarajah, Donaghy, Daniel J., Pembleton, Keith G., Barber, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141806
_version_ 1784753678160232448
author Jayasinghe, Priyanath
Ramilan, Thiagarajah
Donaghy, Daniel J.
Pembleton, Keith G.
Barber, David G.
author_facet Jayasinghe, Priyanath
Ramilan, Thiagarajah
Donaghy, Daniel J.
Pembleton, Keith G.
Barber, David G.
author_sort Jayasinghe, Priyanath
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Globally, tropical pasture species predominate in tropical and subtropical climates, and are the primary feed source for grazing livestock including dairy cattle. Therefore, this study aimed at systematically analysing the nutritive values of tropical pastures and the implications of potential methane gas production from tropical pasture species and livestock, in relation to the growing conditions and agronomic management approaches used (defoliation frequency and intensity) across different climates. This analysis allowed us to understand the better performing tropical pasture species grown across wider geographical regions, in order to improve pasture-based livestock production systems. Results revealed that pasture quality and methane gas production varied among and within species, and were significantly affected by the climate and by the agronomic management regime as well. ABSTRACT: The demand for dairy products is ever increasing across the world. The livestock sector is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. The availability of high-quality pasture is a key requirement to increase the productivity of dairy cows as well as manage enteric methane emissions. Warm-season perennial grasses are the dominant forages in tropical and subtropical regions, and thus exploring their nutritive characteristics is imperative in the effort to improve dairy productivity. Therefore, we have collated a database containing a total of 4750 records, with 1277 measurements of nutritive values representing 56 tropical pasture species and hybrid cultivars grown in 26 different locations in 16 countries; this was done in order to compare the nutritive values and GHG production across different forage species, climatic zones, and defoliation management regimes. Average edaphoclimatic (with minimum and maximum values) conditions for tropical pasture species growing environments were characterized as 22.5 °C temperature (range 17.5–29.30 °C), 1253.9 mm rainfall (range 104.5–3390.0 mm), 582.6 m elevation (range 15–2393 m), and a soil pH of 5.6 (range 4.6–7.0). The data revealed spatial variability in nutritive metrics across bioclimatic zones and between and within species. The ranges of these nutrients were as follows: neutral detergent fibre (NDF) 50.9–79.8%, acid detergent fibre (ADF) 24.7–57.4%, crude protein (CP) 2.1–21.1%, dry matter (DM) digestibility 30.2–70.1%, metabolisable energy (ME)3.4–9.7 MJ kg(−1) DM, with methane (CH(4)) production at 132.9–133.3 g animal(−1) day(−1). The arid/dry zone recorded the highest DM yield, with decreased CP and high fibre components and minerals. Furthermore, the data revealed that climate, defoliation frequency and intensity, in addition to their interactions, have a significant effect on tropical pasture nutritive values and CH(4) production. Overall, hybrid and newer tropical cultivars performed well across different climates, with small variations in herbage quality. The current study revealed important factors that affect pasture nutritive values and CH(4) emissions, with the potential for improving tropical forage through the selection and management of pasture species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93117832022-07-26 Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis Jayasinghe, Priyanath Ramilan, Thiagarajah Donaghy, Daniel J. Pembleton, Keith G. Barber, David G. Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Globally, tropical pasture species predominate in tropical and subtropical climates, and are the primary feed source for grazing livestock including dairy cattle. Therefore, this study aimed at systematically analysing the nutritive values of tropical pastures and the implications of potential methane gas production from tropical pasture species and livestock, in relation to the growing conditions and agronomic management approaches used (defoliation frequency and intensity) across different climates. This analysis allowed us to understand the better performing tropical pasture species grown across wider geographical regions, in order to improve pasture-based livestock production systems. Results revealed that pasture quality and methane gas production varied among and within species, and were significantly affected by the climate and by the agronomic management regime as well. ABSTRACT: The demand for dairy products is ever increasing across the world. The livestock sector is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. The availability of high-quality pasture is a key requirement to increase the productivity of dairy cows as well as manage enteric methane emissions. Warm-season perennial grasses are the dominant forages in tropical and subtropical regions, and thus exploring their nutritive characteristics is imperative in the effort to improve dairy productivity. Therefore, we have collated a database containing a total of 4750 records, with 1277 measurements of nutritive values representing 56 tropical pasture species and hybrid cultivars grown in 26 different locations in 16 countries; this was done in order to compare the nutritive values and GHG production across different forage species, climatic zones, and defoliation management regimes. Average edaphoclimatic (with minimum and maximum values) conditions for tropical pasture species growing environments were characterized as 22.5 °C temperature (range 17.5–29.30 °C), 1253.9 mm rainfall (range 104.5–3390.0 mm), 582.6 m elevation (range 15–2393 m), and a soil pH of 5.6 (range 4.6–7.0). The data revealed spatial variability in nutritive metrics across bioclimatic zones and between and within species. The ranges of these nutrients were as follows: neutral detergent fibre (NDF) 50.9–79.8%, acid detergent fibre (ADF) 24.7–57.4%, crude protein (CP) 2.1–21.1%, dry matter (DM) digestibility 30.2–70.1%, metabolisable energy (ME)3.4–9.7 MJ kg(−1) DM, with methane (CH(4)) production at 132.9–133.3 g animal(−1) day(−1). The arid/dry zone recorded the highest DM yield, with decreased CP and high fibre components and minerals. Furthermore, the data revealed that climate, defoliation frequency and intensity, in addition to their interactions, have a significant effect on tropical pasture nutritive values and CH(4) production. Overall, hybrid and newer tropical cultivars performed well across different climates, with small variations in herbage quality. The current study revealed important factors that affect pasture nutritive values and CH(4) emissions, with the potential for improving tropical forage through the selection and management of pasture species. MDPI 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9311783/ /pubmed/35883354 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141806 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jayasinghe, Priyanath
Ramilan, Thiagarajah
Donaghy, Daniel J.
Pembleton, Keith G.
Barber, David G.
Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Nutritive Values of Tropical Pasture Species Grown in Different Environments, and Implications for Livestock Methane Production: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of nutritive values of tropical pasture species grown in different environments, and implications for livestock methane production: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12141806
work_keys_str_mv AT jayasinghepriyanath comparisonofnutritivevaluesoftropicalpasturespeciesgrownindifferentenvironmentsandimplicationsforlivestockmethaneproductionametaanalysis
AT ramilanthiagarajah comparisonofnutritivevaluesoftropicalpasturespeciesgrownindifferentenvironmentsandimplicationsforlivestockmethaneproductionametaanalysis
AT donaghydanielj comparisonofnutritivevaluesoftropicalpasturespeciesgrownindifferentenvironmentsandimplicationsforlivestockmethaneproductionametaanalysis
AT pembletonkeithg comparisonofnutritivevaluesoftropicalpasturespeciesgrownindifferentenvironmentsandimplicationsforlivestockmethaneproductionametaanalysis
AT barberdavidg comparisonofnutritivevaluesoftropicalpasturespeciesgrownindifferentenvironmentsandimplicationsforlivestockmethaneproductionametaanalysis