Cargando…

Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity

Aortic stiffness is an important clinical parameter for predicting cardiovascular events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) has been proposed for performing this evaluation non-invasively; however, it requires dedicated equipment and experienced operators. We explored the possibility of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mesin, Luca, Floris, Luca, Policastro, Piero, Albani, Stefano, Scacciatella, Paolo, Pugliese, Nicola, Masi, Stefano, Grillo, Andrea, Fabris, Bruno, Antonini-Canterin, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070265
_version_ 1784753716579008512
author Mesin, Luca
Floris, Luca
Policastro, Piero
Albani, Stefano
Scacciatella, Paolo
Pugliese, Nicola
Masi, Stefano
Grillo, Andrea
Fabris, Bruno
Antonini-Canterin, Francesco
author_facet Mesin, Luca
Floris, Luca
Policastro, Piero
Albani, Stefano
Scacciatella, Paolo
Pugliese, Nicola
Masi, Stefano
Grillo, Andrea
Fabris, Bruno
Antonini-Canterin, Francesco
author_sort Mesin, Luca
collection PubMed
description Aortic stiffness is an important clinical parameter for predicting cardiovascular events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) has been proposed for performing this evaluation non-invasively; however, it requires dedicated equipment and experienced operators. We explored the possibility of measuring aortic stiffness using ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta coupled with the Bramwell–Hill equation. Healthy subjects were investigated; measurements of cf-PWV were taken by arterial tonometry and aortic systo-diastolic pressure difference was estimated using a validated model. Pulsatility of an abdominal tract of aorta was assessed by automated processing of ultrasound scans. Through a Bland–Altmann analysis, we found large biases when estimating each parameter by applying the Bramwell–Hill equation to the measured values of the other two paramters (bias, ± 1.96 SD; PWV, about 2.1 ± 2.5 m/s; pulsatility, 12 ± 14%; pressure jump, 47 ± 55 mmHg). These results indicate that the two measures are not interchangeable, and that a large part of the bias is attributable to blood pressure estimation. Further studies are needed to identify the possible sources of bias between cf-PWV and aortic pulsatility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9311937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93119372022-07-26 Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Mesin, Luca Floris, Luca Policastro, Piero Albani, Stefano Scacciatella, Paolo Pugliese, Nicola Masi, Stefano Grillo, Andrea Fabris, Bruno Antonini-Canterin, Francesco Bioengineering (Basel) Article Aortic stiffness is an important clinical parameter for predicting cardiovascular events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) has been proposed for performing this evaluation non-invasively; however, it requires dedicated equipment and experienced operators. We explored the possibility of measuring aortic stiffness using ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta coupled with the Bramwell–Hill equation. Healthy subjects were investigated; measurements of cf-PWV were taken by arterial tonometry and aortic systo-diastolic pressure difference was estimated using a validated model. Pulsatility of an abdominal tract of aorta was assessed by automated processing of ultrasound scans. Through a Bland–Altmann analysis, we found large biases when estimating each parameter by applying the Bramwell–Hill equation to the measured values of the other two paramters (bias, ± 1.96 SD; PWV, about 2.1 ± 2.5 m/s; pulsatility, 12 ± 14%; pressure jump, 47 ± 55 mmHg). These results indicate that the two measures are not interchangeable, and that a large part of the bias is attributable to blood pressure estimation. Further studies are needed to identify the possible sources of bias between cf-PWV and aortic pulsatility. MDPI 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9311937/ /pubmed/35877316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070265 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mesin, Luca
Floris, Luca
Policastro, Piero
Albani, Stefano
Scacciatella, Paolo
Pugliese, Nicola
Masi, Stefano
Grillo, Andrea
Fabris, Bruno
Antonini-Canterin, Francesco
Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
title Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
title_full Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
title_fullStr Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
title_short Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
title_sort estimation of aortic stiffness with bramwell–hill equation: a comparative analysis with carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070265
work_keys_str_mv AT mesinluca estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT florisluca estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT policastropiero estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT albanistefano estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT scacciatellapaolo estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT pugliesenicola estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT masistefano estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT grilloandrea estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT fabrisbruno estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity
AT antoninicanterinfrancesco estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity