Cargando…
Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity
Aortic stiffness is an important clinical parameter for predicting cardiovascular events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) has been proposed for performing this evaluation non-invasively; however, it requires dedicated equipment and experienced operators. We explored the possibility of m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070265 |
_version_ | 1784753716579008512 |
---|---|
author | Mesin, Luca Floris, Luca Policastro, Piero Albani, Stefano Scacciatella, Paolo Pugliese, Nicola Masi, Stefano Grillo, Andrea Fabris, Bruno Antonini-Canterin, Francesco |
author_facet | Mesin, Luca Floris, Luca Policastro, Piero Albani, Stefano Scacciatella, Paolo Pugliese, Nicola Masi, Stefano Grillo, Andrea Fabris, Bruno Antonini-Canterin, Francesco |
author_sort | Mesin, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aortic stiffness is an important clinical parameter for predicting cardiovascular events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) has been proposed for performing this evaluation non-invasively; however, it requires dedicated equipment and experienced operators. We explored the possibility of measuring aortic stiffness using ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta coupled with the Bramwell–Hill equation. Healthy subjects were investigated; measurements of cf-PWV were taken by arterial tonometry and aortic systo-diastolic pressure difference was estimated using a validated model. Pulsatility of an abdominal tract of aorta was assessed by automated processing of ultrasound scans. Through a Bland–Altmann analysis, we found large biases when estimating each parameter by applying the Bramwell–Hill equation to the measured values of the other two paramters (bias, ± 1.96 SD; PWV, about 2.1 ± 2.5 m/s; pulsatility, 12 ± 14%; pressure jump, 47 ± 55 mmHg). These results indicate that the two measures are not interchangeable, and that a large part of the bias is attributable to blood pressure estimation. Further studies are needed to identify the possible sources of bias between cf-PWV and aortic pulsatility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9311937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93119372022-07-26 Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Mesin, Luca Floris, Luca Policastro, Piero Albani, Stefano Scacciatella, Paolo Pugliese, Nicola Masi, Stefano Grillo, Andrea Fabris, Bruno Antonini-Canterin, Francesco Bioengineering (Basel) Article Aortic stiffness is an important clinical parameter for predicting cardiovascular events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) has been proposed for performing this evaluation non-invasively; however, it requires dedicated equipment and experienced operators. We explored the possibility of measuring aortic stiffness using ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta coupled with the Bramwell–Hill equation. Healthy subjects were investigated; measurements of cf-PWV were taken by arterial tonometry and aortic systo-diastolic pressure difference was estimated using a validated model. Pulsatility of an abdominal tract of aorta was assessed by automated processing of ultrasound scans. Through a Bland–Altmann analysis, we found large biases when estimating each parameter by applying the Bramwell–Hill equation to the measured values of the other two paramters (bias, ± 1.96 SD; PWV, about 2.1 ± 2.5 m/s; pulsatility, 12 ± 14%; pressure jump, 47 ± 55 mmHg). These results indicate that the two measures are not interchangeable, and that a large part of the bias is attributable to blood pressure estimation. Further studies are needed to identify the possible sources of bias between cf-PWV and aortic pulsatility. MDPI 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9311937/ /pubmed/35877316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070265 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mesin, Luca Floris, Luca Policastro, Piero Albani, Stefano Scacciatella, Paolo Pugliese, Nicola Masi, Stefano Grillo, Andrea Fabris, Bruno Antonini-Canterin, Francesco Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity |
title | Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity |
title_full | Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity |
title_fullStr | Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity |
title_short | Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity |
title_sort | estimation of aortic stiffness with bramwell–hill equation: a comparative analysis with carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mesinluca estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT florisluca estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT policastropiero estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT albanistefano estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT scacciatellapaolo estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT pugliesenicola estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT masistefano estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT grilloandrea estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT fabrisbruno estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity AT antoninicanterinfrancesco estimationofaorticstiffnesswithbramwellhillequationacomparativeanalysiswithcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocity |