Cargando…

Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study

The salivary contamination occurring at the try-in procedures of lithium disilicate (LDS) can jeopardize their bond strength. Various laboratory reports have concluded that applying 37% phosphoric acid (H(3)PO(4)) could be considered as a predictable way of removing salivary contaminants. An experim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harouny, Ryan, Hardan, Louis, Harouny, Elie, Kassis, Cynthia, Bourgi, Rim, Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika, Kharouf, Naji, Ball, Vincent, Khairallah, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877337
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070286
_version_ 1784753807687680000
author Harouny, Ryan
Hardan, Louis
Harouny, Elie
Kassis, Cynthia
Bourgi, Rim
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Kharouf, Naji
Ball, Vincent
Khairallah, Carlos
author_facet Harouny, Ryan
Hardan, Louis
Harouny, Elie
Kassis, Cynthia
Bourgi, Rim
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Kharouf, Naji
Ball, Vincent
Khairallah, Carlos
author_sort Harouny, Ryan
collection PubMed
description The salivary contamination occurring at the try-in procedures of lithium disilicate (LDS) can jeopardize their bond strength. Various laboratory reports have concluded that applying 37% phosphoric acid (H(3)PO(4)) could be considered as a predictable way of removing salivary contaminants. An experimental method that consists of sealing the intaglio of the ceramic restorations with a layer of cured adhesive could allow consequent time saving for dental practitioners. It is, besides, necessary to establish an optimal decontamination protocol. Hence, this study aimed to determine the most efficient surface treatment, before and after salivary contamination, by comparing the adhesion between resin and LDS. In order to do so, five groups of ten specimens (n = 10) each underwent the different types of surface treatments before bonding, followed by 2500 cycles in the thermocycler. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was then conducted on a universal testing machine (YLE GmbH Waldstraße Bad König, Germany), followed by a fracture-type analysis on an optical microscope (Olympus BX53, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). Statistical analysis was set with a level of significance of α = 0.05. The surface treatment significantly affected the SBS results. The decontamination with HF (12.59 ± 2.71 MPa) and H(3)PO(4) (13.11 ± 1.03 MPa) obtained the highest values, silanizing only before contamination obtained intermediate values (11.74 ± 3.49 MPa), and silanizing both before and after the salivary contamination (10.41 ± 2.75 MPa) along with applying a bonding agent before contamination (9.65 ± 1.99 MPa) resulted in the lowest values. In conclusion, H(3)PO(4) proved to be efficient, thus, allowing the practitioner to avoid the clinical use of HF; it can, therefore, be considered as a valid alternative. Presilanization and resilanization of specimens, along with applying a bonding agent before contamination, did not yield satisfying results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9312288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93122882022-07-26 Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study Harouny, Ryan Hardan, Louis Harouny, Elie Kassis, Cynthia Bourgi, Rim Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika Kharouf, Naji Ball, Vincent Khairallah, Carlos Bioengineering (Basel) Article The salivary contamination occurring at the try-in procedures of lithium disilicate (LDS) can jeopardize their bond strength. Various laboratory reports have concluded that applying 37% phosphoric acid (H(3)PO(4)) could be considered as a predictable way of removing salivary contaminants. An experimental method that consists of sealing the intaglio of the ceramic restorations with a layer of cured adhesive could allow consequent time saving for dental practitioners. It is, besides, necessary to establish an optimal decontamination protocol. Hence, this study aimed to determine the most efficient surface treatment, before and after salivary contamination, by comparing the adhesion between resin and LDS. In order to do so, five groups of ten specimens (n = 10) each underwent the different types of surface treatments before bonding, followed by 2500 cycles in the thermocycler. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was then conducted on a universal testing machine (YLE GmbH Waldstraße Bad König, Germany), followed by a fracture-type analysis on an optical microscope (Olympus BX53, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). Statistical analysis was set with a level of significance of α = 0.05. The surface treatment significantly affected the SBS results. The decontamination with HF (12.59 ± 2.71 MPa) and H(3)PO(4) (13.11 ± 1.03 MPa) obtained the highest values, silanizing only before contamination obtained intermediate values (11.74 ± 3.49 MPa), and silanizing both before and after the salivary contamination (10.41 ± 2.75 MPa) along with applying a bonding agent before contamination (9.65 ± 1.99 MPa) resulted in the lowest values. In conclusion, H(3)PO(4) proved to be efficient, thus, allowing the practitioner to avoid the clinical use of HF; it can, therefore, be considered as a valid alternative. Presilanization and resilanization of specimens, along with applying a bonding agent before contamination, did not yield satisfying results. MDPI 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9312288/ /pubmed/35877337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070286 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Harouny, Ryan
Hardan, Louis
Harouny, Elie
Kassis, Cynthia
Bourgi, Rim
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Kharouf, Naji
Ball, Vincent
Khairallah, Carlos
Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study
title Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study
title_full Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study
title_fullStr Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study
title_short Adhesion of Resin to Lithium Disilicate with Different Surface Treatments before and after Salivary Contamination—An In-Vitro Study
title_sort adhesion of resin to lithium disilicate with different surface treatments before and after salivary contamination—an in-vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877337
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070286
work_keys_str_mv AT harounyryan adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT hardanlouis adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT harounyelie adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT kassiscynthia adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT bourgirim adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT kharoufnaji adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT ballvincent adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy
AT khairallahcarlos adhesionofresintolithiumdisilicatewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsbeforeandaftersalivarycontaminationaninvitrostudy