Cargando…

Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents

The upper urinary tract stenting allows to restore the ureteral patency in various situations. However, one of the main disadvantages of stenting is bacterial contamination, which can be a source of persistent infections that hardly respond to antibiotic therapy. The aim of this study was to investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaliyeva, Sholpan, Simokhina, Natalya, Lavrinenko, Alyona, Zhussupova, Gulzira, Zhunusov, Serik, Semenikhina, Polina, Bikbatyrova, Yuliya, Yelmagambetov, Berik, Myasnikova, Zhanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070850
_version_ 1784753820867231744
author Kaliyeva, Sholpan
Simokhina, Natalya
Lavrinenko, Alyona
Zhussupova, Gulzira
Zhunusov, Serik
Semenikhina, Polina
Bikbatyrova, Yuliya
Yelmagambetov, Berik
Myasnikova, Zhanna
author_facet Kaliyeva, Sholpan
Simokhina, Natalya
Lavrinenko, Alyona
Zhussupova, Gulzira
Zhunusov, Serik
Semenikhina, Polina
Bikbatyrova, Yuliya
Yelmagambetov, Berik
Myasnikova, Zhanna
author_sort Kaliyeva, Sholpan
collection PubMed
description The upper urinary tract stenting allows to restore the ureteral patency in various situations. However, one of the main disadvantages of stenting is bacterial contamination, which can be a source of persistent infections that hardly respond to antibiotic therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the local spectrum of bacterial pathogens and their susceptibility to antibiotics in order to optimize antibacterial therapy after upper urinary tract stenting. A prospective observational study was conducted in which 140 urine samples were examined (70 before stenting and 70 after stenting). Bacterial growth was detected in 37 patients (52.8%) before stenting and in 43 patients (61.4%) after stenting. E. coli (13 (28.8%)) and Streptococcus spp. (8 (17.6%)) strains were more commonly detected before stenting; P. aeruginosa (15 (31.2%)) and E. coli (8 (16.6%)) were usually revealed after stenting. The proportion of P. aeruginosa strains after stenting grew from 4.4% up to 31.2%. E. coli strains were resistant to ampicillin (92.3% before and 100% after stenting). Three strains of E. coli (23.1%) and six strains of P. aeruginosa (40%) were multidrug-resistant. Determination of the bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics and identification of antibiotic-resistant forms of bacteria is a factor in reducing the risk of complications and optimizing antibiotic therapy during the upper urinary tract stenting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9312341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93123412022-07-26 Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents Kaliyeva, Sholpan Simokhina, Natalya Lavrinenko, Alyona Zhussupova, Gulzira Zhunusov, Serik Semenikhina, Polina Bikbatyrova, Yuliya Yelmagambetov, Berik Myasnikova, Zhanna Antibiotics (Basel) Article The upper urinary tract stenting allows to restore the ureteral patency in various situations. However, one of the main disadvantages of stenting is bacterial contamination, which can be a source of persistent infections that hardly respond to antibiotic therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the local spectrum of bacterial pathogens and their susceptibility to antibiotics in order to optimize antibacterial therapy after upper urinary tract stenting. A prospective observational study was conducted in which 140 urine samples were examined (70 before stenting and 70 after stenting). Bacterial growth was detected in 37 patients (52.8%) before stenting and in 43 patients (61.4%) after stenting. E. coli (13 (28.8%)) and Streptococcus spp. (8 (17.6%)) strains were more commonly detected before stenting; P. aeruginosa (15 (31.2%)) and E. coli (8 (16.6%)) were usually revealed after stenting. The proportion of P. aeruginosa strains after stenting grew from 4.4% up to 31.2%. E. coli strains were resistant to ampicillin (92.3% before and 100% after stenting). Three strains of E. coli (23.1%) and six strains of P. aeruginosa (40%) were multidrug-resistant. Determination of the bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics and identification of antibiotic-resistant forms of bacteria is a factor in reducing the risk of complications and optimizing antibiotic therapy during the upper urinary tract stenting. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9312341/ /pubmed/35884104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070850 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kaliyeva, Sholpan
Simokhina, Natalya
Lavrinenko, Alyona
Zhussupova, Gulzira
Zhunusov, Serik
Semenikhina, Polina
Bikbatyrova, Yuliya
Yelmagambetov, Berik
Myasnikova, Zhanna
Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents
title Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents
title_full Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents
title_fullStr Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents
title_short Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents
title_sort bacterial colonization incidence before and after indwelling double-j ureteral stents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070850
work_keys_str_mv AT kaliyevasholpan bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT simokhinanatalya bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT lavrinenkoalyona bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT zhussupovagulzira bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT zhunusovserik bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT semenikhinapolina bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT bikbatyrovayuliya bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT yelmagambetovberik bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents
AT myasnikovazhanna bacterialcolonizationincidencebeforeandafterindwellingdoublejureteralstents