Cargando…

Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction Cystic lesions of the jaws and the impacted teeth are two of the most common cases that require surgical intervention in oral and maxillofacial surgery; however, surgeons also frequently use a traditional technique that involves the removal of the buccal bone plate. This study was condu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abu hawa, Mohamad Husam, Shehri, Zaed, Alkhouri, Issam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911276
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26223
_version_ 1784753863633403904
author Abu hawa, Mohamad Husam
Shehri, Zaed
Alkhouri, Issam
author_facet Abu hawa, Mohamad Husam
Shehri, Zaed
Alkhouri, Issam
author_sort Abu hawa, Mohamad Husam
collection PubMed
description Introduction Cystic lesions of the jaws and the impacted teeth are two of the most common cases that require surgical intervention in oral and maxillofacial surgery; however, surgeons also frequently use a traditional technique that involves the removal of the buccal bone plate. This study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the bone lid technique and the traditional technique. Methods This randomized controlled trial included 20 patients who were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 each): the T group, in which the lesions were accessed using the traditional technique with classical rotating instruments, and the BL group, in which the lesions were accessed with the bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device, with repositioning of the buccal bone plate. Operative time, pain, edema, inferior alveolar nerve injury, and bone defect healing were measured during clinical and radiological follow-ups at 24 h, 72 h, one week, one month, and six months after the surgery. Results Normal soft tissue and bone healing were observed in all cases except one case in the BL group. The T group had a shorter mean operative time than the BL group. In terms of pain, edema, and inferior alveolar nerve injury, the groups did not differ statistically significantly. The percentage of bone defect healing was significantly greater in the BL group than in the T group after six months of follow-up. Conclusion The bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device was effective and safe for managing lesions in the posterior mandibular region and was not associated with increased postoperative complications. The disadvantages of this technique include a longer operative time and the need for fixation tools in some cases. In contrast, this technique outperforms the traditional technique in terms of reducing bone loss and improving the healing of bone defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9312524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93125242022-07-29 Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial Abu hawa, Mohamad Husam Shehri, Zaed Alkhouri, Issam Cureus General Surgery Introduction Cystic lesions of the jaws and the impacted teeth are two of the most common cases that require surgical intervention in oral and maxillofacial surgery; however, surgeons also frequently use a traditional technique that involves the removal of the buccal bone plate. This study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the bone lid technique and the traditional technique. Methods This randomized controlled trial included 20 patients who were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 each): the T group, in which the lesions were accessed using the traditional technique with classical rotating instruments, and the BL group, in which the lesions were accessed with the bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device, with repositioning of the buccal bone plate. Operative time, pain, edema, inferior alveolar nerve injury, and bone defect healing were measured during clinical and radiological follow-ups at 24 h, 72 h, one week, one month, and six months after the surgery. Results Normal soft tissue and bone healing were observed in all cases except one case in the BL group. The T group had a shorter mean operative time than the BL group. In terms of pain, edema, and inferior alveolar nerve injury, the groups did not differ statistically significantly. The percentage of bone defect healing was significantly greater in the BL group than in the T group after six months of follow-up. Conclusion The bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device was effective and safe for managing lesions in the posterior mandibular region and was not associated with increased postoperative complications. The disadvantages of this technique include a longer operative time and the need for fixation tools in some cases. In contrast, this technique outperforms the traditional technique in terms of reducing bone loss and improving the healing of bone defects. Cureus 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9312524/ /pubmed/35911276 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26223 Text en Copyright © 2022, Abu hawa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Abu hawa, Mohamad Husam
Shehri, Zaed
Alkhouri, Issam
Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison between the bone lid technique and the traditional technique in surgical treatment of the posterior mandibular lesions: a randomized controlled trial
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911276
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26223
work_keys_str_mv AT abuhawamohamadhusam comparisonbetweenthebonelidtechniqueandthetraditionaltechniqueinsurgicaltreatmentoftheposteriormandibularlesionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shehrizaed comparisonbetweenthebonelidtechniqueandthetraditionaltechniqueinsurgicaltreatmentoftheposteriormandibularlesionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alkhouriissam comparisonbetweenthebonelidtechniqueandthetraditionaltechniqueinsurgicaltreatmentoftheposteriormandibularlesionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial