Cargando…

Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position

Objective: To compare the operative and fluoroscopy time in two different methods of ureteral stent insertion before prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and method: Over 12 months, 124 patients with urolithiasis who went through prone PCNL were included in our study. All the patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirani, Kaleem K, Ather, M Hammad, Kazmi, Zehra, Aziz, Wajahat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911369
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26220
_version_ 1784753933324910592
author Mirani, Kaleem K
Ather, M Hammad
Kazmi, Zehra
Aziz, Wajahat
author_facet Mirani, Kaleem K
Ather, M Hammad
Kazmi, Zehra
Aziz, Wajahat
author_sort Mirani, Kaleem K
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare the operative and fluoroscopy time in two different methods of ureteral stent insertion before prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and method: Over 12 months, 124 patients with urolithiasis who went through prone PCNL were included in our study. All the patients had kidney stones and were divided into two groups based on the method of ureteral catheter insertion. This was done with the help of flexible or rigid cystoscopy in to group A and group B, respectively. Both groups had an equal number of patients, i.e., 62. The main outcome variables assessed were access time (from intubation to placement of access sheath) and fluoroscopy time during access. Results: The categorical variables (age, gender, site of the stone) between the two groups were comparable. The access time in groups A and B were 48±4.30 and 77±10 minutes, respectively. The fluoroscopy times in groups A and B were 52±14.63 and 116±47.77 seconds, respectively. A statistically significant difference (p-value < 0.05) was observed for both the access and fluoroscopy time. None of the patients in either of the groups had a misplaced ureteral catheter requiring repositioning. Conclusion: Flexible cystoscope-assisted insertion of ureteral catheter prior to PCNL significantly reduces operative time, fluoroscopy time, and consequently radiation exposure during PCNL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9312847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93128472022-07-29 Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position Mirani, Kaleem K Ather, M Hammad Kazmi, Zehra Aziz, Wajahat Cureus Urology Objective: To compare the operative and fluoroscopy time in two different methods of ureteral stent insertion before prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and method: Over 12 months, 124 patients with urolithiasis who went through prone PCNL were included in our study. All the patients had kidney stones and were divided into two groups based on the method of ureteral catheter insertion. This was done with the help of flexible or rigid cystoscopy in to group A and group B, respectively. Both groups had an equal number of patients, i.e., 62. The main outcome variables assessed were access time (from intubation to placement of access sheath) and fluoroscopy time during access. Results: The categorical variables (age, gender, site of the stone) between the two groups were comparable. The access time in groups A and B were 48±4.30 and 77±10 minutes, respectively. The fluoroscopy times in groups A and B were 52±14.63 and 116±47.77 seconds, respectively. A statistically significant difference (p-value < 0.05) was observed for both the access and fluoroscopy time. None of the patients in either of the groups had a misplaced ureteral catheter requiring repositioning. Conclusion: Flexible cystoscope-assisted insertion of ureteral catheter prior to PCNL significantly reduces operative time, fluoroscopy time, and consequently radiation exposure during PCNL. Cureus 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9312847/ /pubmed/35911369 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26220 Text en Copyright © 2022, Mirani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Mirani, Kaleem K
Ather, M Hammad
Kazmi, Zehra
Aziz, Wajahat
Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position
title Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position
title_full Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position
title_fullStr Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position
title_full_unstemmed Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position
title_short Access and Fluoroscopy Time Difference in Patients Undergoing Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Ureteric Catheter Placement in Supine Versus Lithotomy Position
title_sort access and fluoroscopy time difference in patients undergoing prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl) with ureteric catheter placement in supine versus lithotomy position
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9312847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911369
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26220
work_keys_str_mv AT miranikaleemk accessandfluoroscopytimedifferenceinpatientsundergoingpronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlwithuretericcatheterplacementinsupineversuslithotomyposition
AT athermhammad accessandfluoroscopytimedifferenceinpatientsundergoingpronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlwithuretericcatheterplacementinsupineversuslithotomyposition
AT kazmizehra accessandfluoroscopytimedifferenceinpatientsundergoingpronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlwithuretericcatheterplacementinsupineversuslithotomyposition
AT azizwajahat accessandfluoroscopytimedifferenceinpatientsundergoingpronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlwithuretericcatheterplacementinsupineversuslithotomyposition