Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies

The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of reliability studies of the sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria of the international classifications used in sleep medicine. Electronic databases (ubMed (1946–2021) and Web of Science (—2021)) were searched up to December 2021 for studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gauld, Christophe, Lopez, Régis, Philip, Pierre, Taillard, Jacques, Morin, Charles M., Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis, Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884924
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071616
_version_ 1784753990745980928
author Gauld, Christophe
Lopez, Régis
Philip, Pierre
Taillard, Jacques
Morin, Charles M.
Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis
Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur
author_facet Gauld, Christophe
Lopez, Régis
Philip, Pierre
Taillard, Jacques
Morin, Charles M.
Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis
Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur
author_sort Gauld, Christophe
collection PubMed
description The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of reliability studies of the sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria of the international classifications used in sleep medicine. Electronic databases (ubMed (1946–2021) and Web of Science (—2021)) were searched up to December 2021 for studies computing the Cohen’s kappa coefficient of diagnostic criteria for the main sleep–wake disorder categories described in the principal classifications. Cohen’s kappa coefficients were extracted for each main sleep–wake disorder category, for each classification subtype, and for the different types of methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis. The database search identified 383 studies. Fifteen studies were analyzed in this systematic review. Insomnia disorder (10/15) and parasomnia disorder (7/15) diagnostic criteria were the most studied. The reliability of all sleep–wake disorders presented a Cohen’s kappa with substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa mean = 0.66). The two main reliability methods identified were “test–retest reliability” (11/15), principally used for International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), and “joint interrater reliability” (4/15), principally used for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) subtype diagnostic criteria, in particularl, the DSM-5. The implications in terms of the design of the methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis in sleep medicine are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93130772022-07-26 A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies Gauld, Christophe Lopez, Régis Philip, Pierre Taillard, Jacques Morin, Charles M. Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur Biomedicines Systematic Review The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of reliability studies of the sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria of the international classifications used in sleep medicine. Electronic databases (ubMed (1946–2021) and Web of Science (—2021)) were searched up to December 2021 for studies computing the Cohen’s kappa coefficient of diagnostic criteria for the main sleep–wake disorder categories described in the principal classifications. Cohen’s kappa coefficients were extracted for each main sleep–wake disorder category, for each classification subtype, and for the different types of methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis. The database search identified 383 studies. Fifteen studies were analyzed in this systematic review. Insomnia disorder (10/15) and parasomnia disorder (7/15) diagnostic criteria were the most studied. The reliability of all sleep–wake disorders presented a Cohen’s kappa with substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa mean = 0.66). The two main reliability methods identified were “test–retest reliability” (11/15), principally used for International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), and “joint interrater reliability” (4/15), principally used for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) subtype diagnostic criteria, in particularl, the DSM-5. The implications in terms of the design of the methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis in sleep medicine are discussed. MDPI 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9313077/ /pubmed/35884924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071616 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Gauld, Christophe
Lopez, Régis
Philip, Pierre
Taillard, Jacques
Morin, Charles M.
Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis
Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur
A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies
title A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies
title_full A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies
title_short A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies
title_sort systematic review of sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria reliability studies
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884924
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071616
work_keys_str_mv AT gauldchristophe asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT lopezregis asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT philippierre asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT taillardjacques asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT morincharlesm asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT geoffroypierrealexis asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT micoulaudfranchijeanarthur asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT gauldchristophe systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT lopezregis systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT philippierre systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT taillardjacques systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT morincharlesm systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT geoffroypierrealexis systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies
AT micoulaudfranchijeanarthur systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies