Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies
The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of reliability studies of the sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria of the international classifications used in sleep medicine. Electronic databases (ubMed (1946–2021) and Web of Science (—2021)) were searched up to December 2021 for studi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071616 |
_version_ | 1784753990745980928 |
---|---|
author | Gauld, Christophe Lopez, Régis Philip, Pierre Taillard, Jacques Morin, Charles M. Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur |
author_facet | Gauld, Christophe Lopez, Régis Philip, Pierre Taillard, Jacques Morin, Charles M. Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur |
author_sort | Gauld, Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of reliability studies of the sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria of the international classifications used in sleep medicine. Electronic databases (ubMed (1946–2021) and Web of Science (—2021)) were searched up to December 2021 for studies computing the Cohen’s kappa coefficient of diagnostic criteria for the main sleep–wake disorder categories described in the principal classifications. Cohen’s kappa coefficients were extracted for each main sleep–wake disorder category, for each classification subtype, and for the different types of methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis. The database search identified 383 studies. Fifteen studies were analyzed in this systematic review. Insomnia disorder (10/15) and parasomnia disorder (7/15) diagnostic criteria were the most studied. The reliability of all sleep–wake disorders presented a Cohen’s kappa with substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa mean = 0.66). The two main reliability methods identified were “test–retest reliability” (11/15), principally used for International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), and “joint interrater reliability” (4/15), principally used for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) subtype diagnostic criteria, in particularl, the DSM-5. The implications in terms of the design of the methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis in sleep medicine are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9313077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93130772022-07-26 A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies Gauld, Christophe Lopez, Régis Philip, Pierre Taillard, Jacques Morin, Charles M. Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur Biomedicines Systematic Review The aim of this article is to provide a systematic review of reliability studies of the sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria of the international classifications used in sleep medicine. Electronic databases (ubMed (1946–2021) and Web of Science (—2021)) were searched up to December 2021 for studies computing the Cohen’s kappa coefficient of diagnostic criteria for the main sleep–wake disorder categories described in the principal classifications. Cohen’s kappa coefficients were extracted for each main sleep–wake disorder category, for each classification subtype, and for the different types of methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis. The database search identified 383 studies. Fifteen studies were analyzed in this systematic review. Insomnia disorder (10/15) and parasomnia disorder (7/15) diagnostic criteria were the most studied. The reliability of all sleep–wake disorders presented a Cohen’s kappa with substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa mean = 0.66). The two main reliability methods identified were “test–retest reliability” (11/15), principally used for International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), and “joint interrater reliability” (4/15), principally used for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) subtype diagnostic criteria, in particularl, the DSM-5. The implications in terms of the design of the methods used to test the degree of agreement about a diagnosis in sleep medicine are discussed. MDPI 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9313077/ /pubmed/35884924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071616 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Gauld, Christophe Lopez, Régis Philip, Pierre Taillard, Jacques Morin, Charles M. Geoffroy, Pierre Alexis Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies |
title | A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Sleep–Wake Disorder Diagnostic Criteria Reliability Studies |
title_sort | systematic review of sleep–wake disorder diagnostic criteria reliability studies |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884924 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gauldchristophe asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT lopezregis asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT philippierre asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT taillardjacques asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT morincharlesm asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT geoffroypierrealexis asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT micoulaudfranchijeanarthur asystematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT gauldchristophe systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT lopezregis systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT philippierre systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT taillardjacques systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT morincharlesm systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT geoffroypierrealexis systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies AT micoulaudfranchijeanarthur systematicreviewofsleepwakedisorderdiagnosticcriteriareliabilitystudies |