Cargando…
Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder, with 30–40% of OCD patients being unresponsive to adequate trials of anti-OCD drugs and cognitive behavior therapy. The aim of this paper is to investigate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on treating refractory...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070943 |
_version_ | 1784754002207965184 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Shu Fang, Yan |
author_facet | Zhou, Shu Fang, Yan |
author_sort | Zhou, Shu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder, with 30–40% of OCD patients being unresponsive to adequate trials of anti-OCD drugs and cognitive behavior therapy. The aim of this paper is to investigate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on treating refractory OCD. With PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library used on 15 February 2022, 24 randomized controlled trials involving 663 patients were included. According to this analysis, NIBS including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta-burst stimulation (TBS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), had a moderate effect on the reduction of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.26–0.81; p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, rTMS seemed to produce a better therapeutic effect (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.38–1.08; p < 0.01). Moreover, excitatory (SMD = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.24–2.01; p = 0.01) and inhibitory (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.26–1.36; p < 0.01) stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) both alleviated OCD symptoms. In the secondary outcome of clinical response rates, NIBS treatment led to an increase in response rates (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.57–3.25; p < 0.01). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9313124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93131242022-07-26 Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Zhou, Shu Fang, Yan Brain Sci Systematic Review Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder, with 30–40% of OCD patients being unresponsive to adequate trials of anti-OCD drugs and cognitive behavior therapy. The aim of this paper is to investigate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on treating refractory OCD. With PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library used on 15 February 2022, 24 randomized controlled trials involving 663 patients were included. According to this analysis, NIBS including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta-burst stimulation (TBS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), had a moderate effect on the reduction of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.26–0.81; p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, rTMS seemed to produce a better therapeutic effect (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.38–1.08; p < 0.01). Moreover, excitatory (SMD = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.24–2.01; p = 0.01) and inhibitory (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.26–1.36; p < 0.01) stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) both alleviated OCD symptoms. In the secondary outcome of clinical response rates, NIBS treatment led to an increase in response rates (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.57–3.25; p < 0.01). MDPI 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9313124/ /pubmed/35884749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070943 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Zhou, Shu Fang, Yan Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoushu efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationforrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fangyan efficacyofnoninvasivebrainstimulationforrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |