Cargando…

Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)

Though likely the most common clinical diagnosis in reproductive medicine, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is still only poorly understood. Based on previously published research, and here newly presented supportive evidence, we propose to replace the four current phenotypes of PCOS with only t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleicher, Norbert, Darmon, Sarah, Patrizio, Pasquale, Barad, David H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071505
_version_ 1784754022964527104
author Gleicher, Norbert
Darmon, Sarah
Patrizio, Pasquale
Barad, David H.
author_facet Gleicher, Norbert
Darmon, Sarah
Patrizio, Pasquale
Barad, David H.
author_sort Gleicher, Norbert
collection PubMed
description Though likely the most common clinical diagnosis in reproductive medicine, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is still only poorly understood. Based on previously published research, and here newly presented supportive evidence, we propose to replace the four current phenotypes of PCOS with only two entities—a hyperandrogenic phenotype (H-PCOS) including current phenotypes A, B, and C, and a hyper-/hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), representing the current phenotype D under the Rotterdam criteria. Reclassifying PCOS in this way likely establishes two distinct genomic entities, H-PCOS, primarily characterized by metabolic abnormalities (i.e., metabolic syndrome) and a hyperandrogenic with advancing age becoming a hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), in approximately 85% characterized by a hyperactive immune system mostly due to autoimmunity and inflammation. We furthermore suggest that because of hypoandrogenism usually developing after age 35, HH-PCOS at that age becomes relatively treatment resistant to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and offer in a case-controlled study evidence that androgen supplementation overcomes this resistance. In view of highly distinct clinical presentations of H-PCOS and HH-PCOS, polygenic risk scores should be able to differentiate between these 2 PCOS phenotypes. At least one clustering analysis in the literature is supportive of this concept.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93132072022-07-26 Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Gleicher, Norbert Darmon, Sarah Patrizio, Pasquale Barad, David H. Biomedicines Concept Paper Though likely the most common clinical diagnosis in reproductive medicine, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is still only poorly understood. Based on previously published research, and here newly presented supportive evidence, we propose to replace the four current phenotypes of PCOS with only two entities—a hyperandrogenic phenotype (H-PCOS) including current phenotypes A, B, and C, and a hyper-/hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), representing the current phenotype D under the Rotterdam criteria. Reclassifying PCOS in this way likely establishes two distinct genomic entities, H-PCOS, primarily characterized by metabolic abnormalities (i.e., metabolic syndrome) and a hyperandrogenic with advancing age becoming a hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), in approximately 85% characterized by a hyperactive immune system mostly due to autoimmunity and inflammation. We furthermore suggest that because of hypoandrogenism usually developing after age 35, HH-PCOS at that age becomes relatively treatment resistant to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and offer in a case-controlled study evidence that androgen supplementation overcomes this resistance. In view of highly distinct clinical presentations of H-PCOS and HH-PCOS, polygenic risk scores should be able to differentiate between these 2 PCOS phenotypes. At least one clustering analysis in the literature is supportive of this concept. MDPI 2022-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9313207/ /pubmed/35884809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071505 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Concept Paper
Gleicher, Norbert
Darmon, Sarah
Patrizio, Pasquale
Barad, David H.
Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
title Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
title_full Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
title_fullStr Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
title_full_unstemmed Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
title_short Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
title_sort reconsidering the polycystic ovary syndrome (pcos)
topic Concept Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071505
work_keys_str_mv AT gleichernorbert reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos
AT darmonsarah reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos
AT patriziopasquale reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos
AT baraddavidh reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos