Cargando…
Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
Though likely the most common clinical diagnosis in reproductive medicine, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is still only poorly understood. Based on previously published research, and here newly presented supportive evidence, we propose to replace the four current phenotypes of PCOS with only t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071505 |
_version_ | 1784754022964527104 |
---|---|
author | Gleicher, Norbert Darmon, Sarah Patrizio, Pasquale Barad, David H. |
author_facet | Gleicher, Norbert Darmon, Sarah Patrizio, Pasquale Barad, David H. |
author_sort | Gleicher, Norbert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Though likely the most common clinical diagnosis in reproductive medicine, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is still only poorly understood. Based on previously published research, and here newly presented supportive evidence, we propose to replace the four current phenotypes of PCOS with only two entities—a hyperandrogenic phenotype (H-PCOS) including current phenotypes A, B, and C, and a hyper-/hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), representing the current phenotype D under the Rotterdam criteria. Reclassifying PCOS in this way likely establishes two distinct genomic entities, H-PCOS, primarily characterized by metabolic abnormalities (i.e., metabolic syndrome) and a hyperandrogenic with advancing age becoming a hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), in approximately 85% characterized by a hyperactive immune system mostly due to autoimmunity and inflammation. We furthermore suggest that because of hypoandrogenism usually developing after age 35, HH-PCOS at that age becomes relatively treatment resistant to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and offer in a case-controlled study evidence that androgen supplementation overcomes this resistance. In view of highly distinct clinical presentations of H-PCOS and HH-PCOS, polygenic risk scores should be able to differentiate between these 2 PCOS phenotypes. At least one clustering analysis in the literature is supportive of this concept. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9313207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93132072022-07-26 Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Gleicher, Norbert Darmon, Sarah Patrizio, Pasquale Barad, David H. Biomedicines Concept Paper Though likely the most common clinical diagnosis in reproductive medicine, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is still only poorly understood. Based on previously published research, and here newly presented supportive evidence, we propose to replace the four current phenotypes of PCOS with only two entities—a hyperandrogenic phenotype (H-PCOS) including current phenotypes A, B, and C, and a hyper-/hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), representing the current phenotype D under the Rotterdam criteria. Reclassifying PCOS in this way likely establishes two distinct genomic entities, H-PCOS, primarily characterized by metabolic abnormalities (i.e., metabolic syndrome) and a hyperandrogenic with advancing age becoming a hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), in approximately 85% characterized by a hyperactive immune system mostly due to autoimmunity and inflammation. We furthermore suggest that because of hypoandrogenism usually developing after age 35, HH-PCOS at that age becomes relatively treatment resistant to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and offer in a case-controlled study evidence that androgen supplementation overcomes this resistance. In view of highly distinct clinical presentations of H-PCOS and HH-PCOS, polygenic risk scores should be able to differentiate between these 2 PCOS phenotypes. At least one clustering analysis in the literature is supportive of this concept. MDPI 2022-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9313207/ /pubmed/35884809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071505 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Concept Paper Gleicher, Norbert Darmon, Sarah Patrizio, Pasquale Barad, David H. Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) |
title | Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) |
title_full | Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) |
title_fullStr | Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) |
title_short | Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) |
title_sort | reconsidering the polycystic ovary syndrome (pcos) |
topic | Concept Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gleichernorbert reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos AT darmonsarah reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos AT patriziopasquale reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos AT baraddavidh reconsideringthepolycysticovarysyndromepcos |