Cargando…

Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation

Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kricheldorff, Julius, Göke, Katharina, Kiebs, Maximilian, Kasten, Florian H., Herrmann, Christoph S., Witt, Karsten, Hurlemann, Rene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070929
_version_ 1784754037620473856
author Kricheldorff, Julius
Göke, Katharina
Kiebs, Maximilian
Kasten, Florian H.
Herrmann, Christoph S.
Witt, Karsten
Hurlemann, Rene
author_facet Kricheldorff, Julius
Göke, Katharina
Kiebs, Maximilian
Kasten, Florian H.
Herrmann, Christoph S.
Witt, Karsten
Hurlemann, Rene
author_sort Kricheldorff, Julius
collection PubMed
description Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal application of electric impulses to brain tissue. Electrodes are placed in the brain in order to modulate neural activity and to correct parameters of pathological oscillation in brain circuits such as their amplitude or frequency. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive alternative with the stimulator generating a magnetic field in a coil over the scalp that induces an electric field in the brain which, in turn, interacts with ongoing brain activity. Depending upon stimulation parameters, excitation and inhibition can be achieved. Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) applies electric fields to the scalp that spread along the skull in order to reach the brain, thus, limiting current strength to avoid skin sensations and cranial muscle pain. Therefore, tES can only modulate brain activity and is considered subthreshold, i.e., it does not directly elicit neuronal action potentials. In this review, we collect hints for neuroplastic changes such as modulation of behavior, the electric activity of the brain, or the evolution of clinical signs and symptoms in response to stimulation. Possible mechanisms are discussed, and future paradigms are suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93132652022-07-26 Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation Kricheldorff, Julius Göke, Katharina Kiebs, Maximilian Kasten, Florian H. Herrmann, Christoph S. Witt, Karsten Hurlemann, Rene Brain Sci Review Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal application of electric impulses to brain tissue. Electrodes are placed in the brain in order to modulate neural activity and to correct parameters of pathological oscillation in brain circuits such as their amplitude or frequency. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive alternative with the stimulator generating a magnetic field in a coil over the scalp that induces an electric field in the brain which, in turn, interacts with ongoing brain activity. Depending upon stimulation parameters, excitation and inhibition can be achieved. Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) applies electric fields to the scalp that spread along the skull in order to reach the brain, thus, limiting current strength to avoid skin sensations and cranial muscle pain. Therefore, tES can only modulate brain activity and is considered subthreshold, i.e., it does not directly elicit neuronal action potentials. In this review, we collect hints for neuroplastic changes such as modulation of behavior, the electric activity of the brain, or the evolution of clinical signs and symptoms in response to stimulation. Possible mechanisms are discussed, and future paradigms are suggested. MDPI 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9313265/ /pubmed/35884734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070929 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kricheldorff, Julius
Göke, Katharina
Kiebs, Maximilian
Kasten, Florian H.
Herrmann, Christoph S.
Witt, Karsten
Hurlemann, Rene
Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation
title Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation
title_full Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation
title_fullStr Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation
title_short Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation
title_sort evidence of neuroplastic changes after transcranial magnetic, electric, and deep brain stimulation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070929
work_keys_str_mv AT kricheldorffjulius evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation
AT gokekatharina evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation
AT kiebsmaximilian evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation
AT kastenflorianh evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation
AT herrmannchristophs evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation
AT wittkarsten evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation
AT hurlemannrene evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation