Cargando…
Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation
Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070929 |
_version_ | 1784754037620473856 |
---|---|
author | Kricheldorff, Julius Göke, Katharina Kiebs, Maximilian Kasten, Florian H. Herrmann, Christoph S. Witt, Karsten Hurlemann, Rene |
author_facet | Kricheldorff, Julius Göke, Katharina Kiebs, Maximilian Kasten, Florian H. Herrmann, Christoph S. Witt, Karsten Hurlemann, Rene |
author_sort | Kricheldorff, Julius |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal application of electric impulses to brain tissue. Electrodes are placed in the brain in order to modulate neural activity and to correct parameters of pathological oscillation in brain circuits such as their amplitude or frequency. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive alternative with the stimulator generating a magnetic field in a coil over the scalp that induces an electric field in the brain which, in turn, interacts with ongoing brain activity. Depending upon stimulation parameters, excitation and inhibition can be achieved. Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) applies electric fields to the scalp that spread along the skull in order to reach the brain, thus, limiting current strength to avoid skin sensations and cranial muscle pain. Therefore, tES can only modulate brain activity and is considered subthreshold, i.e., it does not directly elicit neuronal action potentials. In this review, we collect hints for neuroplastic changes such as modulation of behavior, the electric activity of the brain, or the evolution of clinical signs and symptoms in response to stimulation. Possible mechanisms are discussed, and future paradigms are suggested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9313265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93132652022-07-26 Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation Kricheldorff, Julius Göke, Katharina Kiebs, Maximilian Kasten, Florian H. Herrmann, Christoph S. Witt, Karsten Hurlemann, Rene Brain Sci Review Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal application of electric impulses to brain tissue. Electrodes are placed in the brain in order to modulate neural activity and to correct parameters of pathological oscillation in brain circuits such as their amplitude or frequency. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive alternative with the stimulator generating a magnetic field in a coil over the scalp that induces an electric field in the brain which, in turn, interacts with ongoing brain activity. Depending upon stimulation parameters, excitation and inhibition can be achieved. Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) applies electric fields to the scalp that spread along the skull in order to reach the brain, thus, limiting current strength to avoid skin sensations and cranial muscle pain. Therefore, tES can only modulate brain activity and is considered subthreshold, i.e., it does not directly elicit neuronal action potentials. In this review, we collect hints for neuroplastic changes such as modulation of behavior, the electric activity of the brain, or the evolution of clinical signs and symptoms in response to stimulation. Possible mechanisms are discussed, and future paradigms are suggested. MDPI 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9313265/ /pubmed/35884734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070929 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kricheldorff, Julius Göke, Katharina Kiebs, Maximilian Kasten, Florian H. Herrmann, Christoph S. Witt, Karsten Hurlemann, Rene Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation |
title | Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation |
title_full | Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation |
title_short | Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation |
title_sort | evidence of neuroplastic changes after transcranial magnetic, electric, and deep brain stimulation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070929 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kricheldorffjulius evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation AT gokekatharina evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation AT kiebsmaximilian evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation AT kastenflorianh evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation AT herrmannchristophs evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation AT wittkarsten evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation AT hurlemannrene evidenceofneuroplasticchangesaftertranscranialmagneticelectricanddeepbrainstimulation |