Cargando…

Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion

Living sample viability measurement is an extremely common process in medical, pharmaceutical, and biological fields, especially drug pharmacology and toxicology detection. Nowadays, there are a number of chemical, optical, and mechanical methods that have been developed in response to the growing d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-madani, Hamzah, Du, Hui, Yao, Junlie, Peng, Hao, Yao, Chenyang, Jiang, Bo, Wu, Aiguo, Yang, Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12070453
_version_ 1784754053846138880
author Al-madani, Hamzah
Du, Hui
Yao, Junlie
Peng, Hao
Yao, Chenyang
Jiang, Bo
Wu, Aiguo
Yang, Fang
author_facet Al-madani, Hamzah
Du, Hui
Yao, Junlie
Peng, Hao
Yao, Chenyang
Jiang, Bo
Wu, Aiguo
Yang, Fang
author_sort Al-madani, Hamzah
collection PubMed
description Living sample viability measurement is an extremely common process in medical, pharmaceutical, and biological fields, especially drug pharmacology and toxicology detection. Nowadays, there are a number of chemical, optical, and mechanical methods that have been developed in response to the growing demand for simple, rapid, accurate, and reliable real-time living sample viability assessment. In parallel, the development trend of viability measurement methods (VMMs) has increasingly shifted from traditional assays towards the innovative atomic force microscope (AFM) oscillating sensor method (referred to as nanomotion), which takes advantage of the adhesion of living samples to an oscillating surface. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the common VMMs, laying emphasis on their benefits and drawbacks, as well as evaluating the potential utility of VMMs. In addition, we discuss the nanomotion technique, focusing on its applications, sample attachment protocols, and result display methods. Furthermore, the challenges and future perspectives on nanomotion are commented on, mainly emphasizing scientific restrictions and development orientations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93133302022-07-26 Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion Al-madani, Hamzah Du, Hui Yao, Junlie Peng, Hao Yao, Chenyang Jiang, Bo Wu, Aiguo Yang, Fang Biosensors (Basel) Review Living sample viability measurement is an extremely common process in medical, pharmaceutical, and biological fields, especially drug pharmacology and toxicology detection. Nowadays, there are a number of chemical, optical, and mechanical methods that have been developed in response to the growing demand for simple, rapid, accurate, and reliable real-time living sample viability assessment. In parallel, the development trend of viability measurement methods (VMMs) has increasingly shifted from traditional assays towards the innovative atomic force microscope (AFM) oscillating sensor method (referred to as nanomotion), which takes advantage of the adhesion of living samples to an oscillating surface. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the common VMMs, laying emphasis on their benefits and drawbacks, as well as evaluating the potential utility of VMMs. In addition, we discuss the nanomotion technique, focusing on its applications, sample attachment protocols, and result display methods. Furthermore, the challenges and future perspectives on nanomotion are commented on, mainly emphasizing scientific restrictions and development orientations. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9313330/ /pubmed/35884256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12070453 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Al-madani, Hamzah
Du, Hui
Yao, Junlie
Peng, Hao
Yao, Chenyang
Jiang, Bo
Wu, Aiguo
Yang, Fang
Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion
title Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion
title_full Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion
title_fullStr Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion
title_full_unstemmed Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion
title_short Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion
title_sort living sample viability measurement methods from traditional assays to nanomotion
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12070453
work_keys_str_mv AT almadanihamzah livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion
AT duhui livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion
AT yaojunlie livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion
AT penghao livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion
AT yaochenyang livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion
AT jiangbo livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion
AT wuaiguo livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion
AT yangfang livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion