Cargando…
Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion
Living sample viability measurement is an extremely common process in medical, pharmaceutical, and biological fields, especially drug pharmacology and toxicology detection. Nowadays, there are a number of chemical, optical, and mechanical methods that have been developed in response to the growing d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12070453 |
_version_ | 1784754053846138880 |
---|---|
author | Al-madani, Hamzah Du, Hui Yao, Junlie Peng, Hao Yao, Chenyang Jiang, Bo Wu, Aiguo Yang, Fang |
author_facet | Al-madani, Hamzah Du, Hui Yao, Junlie Peng, Hao Yao, Chenyang Jiang, Bo Wu, Aiguo Yang, Fang |
author_sort | Al-madani, Hamzah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Living sample viability measurement is an extremely common process in medical, pharmaceutical, and biological fields, especially drug pharmacology and toxicology detection. Nowadays, there are a number of chemical, optical, and mechanical methods that have been developed in response to the growing demand for simple, rapid, accurate, and reliable real-time living sample viability assessment. In parallel, the development trend of viability measurement methods (VMMs) has increasingly shifted from traditional assays towards the innovative atomic force microscope (AFM) oscillating sensor method (referred to as nanomotion), which takes advantage of the adhesion of living samples to an oscillating surface. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the common VMMs, laying emphasis on their benefits and drawbacks, as well as evaluating the potential utility of VMMs. In addition, we discuss the nanomotion technique, focusing on its applications, sample attachment protocols, and result display methods. Furthermore, the challenges and future perspectives on nanomotion are commented on, mainly emphasizing scientific restrictions and development orientations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9313330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93133302022-07-26 Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion Al-madani, Hamzah Du, Hui Yao, Junlie Peng, Hao Yao, Chenyang Jiang, Bo Wu, Aiguo Yang, Fang Biosensors (Basel) Review Living sample viability measurement is an extremely common process in medical, pharmaceutical, and biological fields, especially drug pharmacology and toxicology detection. Nowadays, there are a number of chemical, optical, and mechanical methods that have been developed in response to the growing demand for simple, rapid, accurate, and reliable real-time living sample viability assessment. In parallel, the development trend of viability measurement methods (VMMs) has increasingly shifted from traditional assays towards the innovative atomic force microscope (AFM) oscillating sensor method (referred to as nanomotion), which takes advantage of the adhesion of living samples to an oscillating surface. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the common VMMs, laying emphasis on their benefits and drawbacks, as well as evaluating the potential utility of VMMs. In addition, we discuss the nanomotion technique, focusing on its applications, sample attachment protocols, and result display methods. Furthermore, the challenges and future perspectives on nanomotion are commented on, mainly emphasizing scientific restrictions and development orientations. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9313330/ /pubmed/35884256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12070453 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Al-madani, Hamzah Du, Hui Yao, Junlie Peng, Hao Yao, Chenyang Jiang, Bo Wu, Aiguo Yang, Fang Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion |
title | Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion |
title_full | Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion |
title_fullStr | Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion |
title_full_unstemmed | Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion |
title_short | Living Sample Viability Measurement Methods from Traditional Assays to Nanomotion |
title_sort | living sample viability measurement methods from traditional assays to nanomotion |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35884256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12070453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almadanihamzah livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion AT duhui livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion AT yaojunlie livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion AT penghao livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion AT yaochenyang livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion AT jiangbo livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion AT wuaiguo livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion AT yangfang livingsampleviabilitymeasurementmethodsfromtraditionalassaystonanomotion |