Cargando…

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic continues to devastate communities all over the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the test agent as a prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population of high-risk healthcare workers. Methods The study was a multi-centre,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balmforth, Damian, Swales, James A, Silpa, Laurence, Dunton, Alan, Davies, Kay E., Davies, Stephen G., Kamath, Archana, Gupta, Jayanti, Gupta, Sandeep, Masood, M.Abid, McKnight, Áine, Rees, Doug, Russell, Angela J., Jaggi, Manu, Uppal, Rakesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105248
_version_ 1784754102247358464
author Balmforth, Damian
Swales, James A
Silpa, Laurence
Dunton, Alan
Davies, Kay E.
Davies, Stephen G.
Kamath, Archana
Gupta, Jayanti
Gupta, Sandeep
Masood, M.Abid
McKnight, Áine
Rees, Doug
Russell, Angela J.
Jaggi, Manu
Uppal, Rakesh
author_facet Balmforth, Damian
Swales, James A
Silpa, Laurence
Dunton, Alan
Davies, Kay E.
Davies, Stephen G.
Kamath, Archana
Gupta, Jayanti
Gupta, Sandeep
Masood, M.Abid
McKnight, Áine
Rees, Doug
Russell, Angela J.
Jaggi, Manu
Uppal, Rakesh
author_sort Balmforth, Damian
collection PubMed
description Background The COVID-19 pandemic continues to devastate communities all over the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the test agent as a prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population of high-risk healthcare workers. Methods The study was a multi-centre, prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Key eligibility criteria included absence of significant co-morbidity and no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Participants were randomised to either the active agent nasal spray or placebo using computer generated random number tables. The nasal spray was administered 3 times daily over a 45 day course. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects who tested positive for IgGS (anti-spike, immunoglobulin G specific to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2) at day 45. Results Between 16th April 2021 and 26th July 2021, 556 participants were analysed for the primary endpoint (275 Test; 281 Placebo). The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to placebo [36 cases (13.1%) Vs 97 cases (34.5%); OR 0.29 (95% CI; 0.18–0.45), p < 0.0001]. Fewer clinical symptoms were also seen in the test group [57 cases (17.6%) vs 112 cases (34.6%); OR 0.40, (95% CI; 0.27–0.59), p < 0.0001]. No harmful effects were associated with taking the test agent. Conclusion The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers, with 62% fewer infections when compared to placebo. It was found to be safe and well tolerated and offers a novel treatment option for prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93135332022-07-26 Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Balmforth, Damian Swales, James A Silpa, Laurence Dunton, Alan Davies, Kay E. Davies, Stephen G. Kamath, Archana Gupta, Jayanti Gupta, Sandeep Masood, M.Abid McKnight, Áine Rees, Doug Russell, Angela J. Jaggi, Manu Uppal, Rakesh J Clin Virol Article Background The COVID-19 pandemic continues to devastate communities all over the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the test agent as a prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population of high-risk healthcare workers. Methods The study was a multi-centre, prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Key eligibility criteria included absence of significant co-morbidity and no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Participants were randomised to either the active agent nasal spray or placebo using computer generated random number tables. The nasal spray was administered 3 times daily over a 45 day course. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects who tested positive for IgGS (anti-spike, immunoglobulin G specific to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2) at day 45. Results Between 16th April 2021 and 26th July 2021, 556 participants were analysed for the primary endpoint (275 Test; 281 Placebo). The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to placebo [36 cases (13.1%) Vs 97 cases (34.5%); OR 0.29 (95% CI; 0.18–0.45), p < 0.0001]. Fewer clinical symptoms were also seen in the test group [57 cases (17.6%) vs 112 cases (34.6%); OR 0.40, (95% CI; 0.27–0.59), p < 0.0001]. No harmful effects were associated with taking the test agent. Conclusion The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers, with 62% fewer infections when compared to placebo. It was found to be safe and well tolerated and offers a novel treatment option for prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-10 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9313533/ /pubmed/35952426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105248 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Balmforth, Damian
Swales, James A
Silpa, Laurence
Dunton, Alan
Davies, Kay E.
Davies, Stephen G.
Kamath, Archana
Gupta, Jayanti
Gupta, Sandeep
Masood, M.Abid
McKnight, Áine
Rees, Doug
Russell, Angela J.
Jaggi, Manu
Uppal, Rakesh
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
title Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
title_full Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
title_fullStr Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
title_short Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
title_sort evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of sars-cov-2 infection: a multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105248
work_keys_str_mv AT balmforthdamian evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT swalesjamesa evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT silpalaurence evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT duntonalan evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT davieskaye evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT daviesstepheng evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT kamatharchana evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT guptajayanti evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT guptasandeep evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT masoodmabid evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT mcknightaine evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT reesdoug evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT russellangelaj evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT jaggimanu evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT uppalrakesh evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial