Cargando…
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic continues to devastate communities all over the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the test agent as a prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population of high-risk healthcare workers. Methods The study was a multi-centre,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105248 |
_version_ | 1784754102247358464 |
---|---|
author | Balmforth, Damian Swales, James A Silpa, Laurence Dunton, Alan Davies, Kay E. Davies, Stephen G. Kamath, Archana Gupta, Jayanti Gupta, Sandeep Masood, M.Abid McKnight, Áine Rees, Doug Russell, Angela J. Jaggi, Manu Uppal, Rakesh |
author_facet | Balmforth, Damian Swales, James A Silpa, Laurence Dunton, Alan Davies, Kay E. Davies, Stephen G. Kamath, Archana Gupta, Jayanti Gupta, Sandeep Masood, M.Abid McKnight, Áine Rees, Doug Russell, Angela J. Jaggi, Manu Uppal, Rakesh |
author_sort | Balmforth, Damian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The COVID-19 pandemic continues to devastate communities all over the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the test agent as a prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population of high-risk healthcare workers. Methods The study was a multi-centre, prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Key eligibility criteria included absence of significant co-morbidity and no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Participants were randomised to either the active agent nasal spray or placebo using computer generated random number tables. The nasal spray was administered 3 times daily over a 45 day course. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects who tested positive for IgGS (anti-spike, immunoglobulin G specific to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2) at day 45. Results Between 16th April 2021 and 26th July 2021, 556 participants were analysed for the primary endpoint (275 Test; 281 Placebo). The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to placebo [36 cases (13.1%) Vs 97 cases (34.5%); OR 0.29 (95% CI; 0.18–0.45), p < 0.0001]. Fewer clinical symptoms were also seen in the test group [57 cases (17.6%) vs 112 cases (34.6%); OR 0.40, (95% CI; 0.27–0.59), p < 0.0001]. No harmful effects were associated with taking the test agent. Conclusion The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers, with 62% fewer infections when compared to placebo. It was found to be safe and well tolerated and offers a novel treatment option for prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9313533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93135332022-07-26 Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Balmforth, Damian Swales, James A Silpa, Laurence Dunton, Alan Davies, Kay E. Davies, Stephen G. Kamath, Archana Gupta, Jayanti Gupta, Sandeep Masood, M.Abid McKnight, Áine Rees, Doug Russell, Angela J. Jaggi, Manu Uppal, Rakesh J Clin Virol Article Background The COVID-19 pandemic continues to devastate communities all over the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the test agent as a prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population of high-risk healthcare workers. Methods The study was a multi-centre, prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Key eligibility criteria included absence of significant co-morbidity and no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Participants were randomised to either the active agent nasal spray or placebo using computer generated random number tables. The nasal spray was administered 3 times daily over a 45 day course. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects who tested positive for IgGS (anti-spike, immunoglobulin G specific to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2) at day 45. Results Between 16th April 2021 and 26th July 2021, 556 participants were analysed for the primary endpoint (275 Test; 281 Placebo). The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to placebo [36 cases (13.1%) Vs 97 cases (34.5%); OR 0.29 (95% CI; 0.18–0.45), p < 0.0001]. Fewer clinical symptoms were also seen in the test group [57 cases (17.6%) vs 112 cases (34.6%); OR 0.40, (95% CI; 0.27–0.59), p < 0.0001]. No harmful effects were associated with taking the test agent. Conclusion The test agent significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers, with 62% fewer infections when compared to placebo. It was found to be safe and well tolerated and offers a novel treatment option for prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-10 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9313533/ /pubmed/35952426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105248 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Balmforth, Damian Swales, James A Silpa, Laurence Dunton, Alan Davies, Kay E. Davies, Stephen G. Kamath, Archana Gupta, Jayanti Gupta, Sandeep Masood, M.Abid McKnight, Áine Rees, Doug Russell, Angela J. Jaggi, Manu Uppal, Rakesh Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. |
title | Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. |
title_full | Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. |
title_short | Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. |
title_sort | evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel prophylactic nasal spray in the prevention of sars-cov-2 infection: a multi-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balmforthdamian evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT swalesjamesa evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT silpalaurence evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT duntonalan evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT davieskaye evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT daviesstepheng evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT kamatharchana evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT guptajayanti evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT guptasandeep evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT masoodmabid evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT mcknightaine evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT reesdoug evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT russellangelaj evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT jaggimanu evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT uppalrakesh evaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofanovelprophylacticnasalsprayinthepreventionofsarscov2infectionamulticentredoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial |