Cargando…
Five‐year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw‐retained zirconia‐based implant‐supported single crowns
OBJECTIVES: To compare screw‐retained and cemented all‐ceramic implant‐supported single crowns regarding biological and technical outcomes over a 5‐year observation period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 44 patients, 44 two‐piece dental implants were placed in single‐tooth gaps in the esthetic zone. Pati...
Autores principales: | Kraus, Riccardo D., Espuelas, Catharina, Hämmerle, Christoph H. F., Jung, Ronald E., Sailer, Irena, Thoma, Daniel S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13913 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cemented versus screw‐retained zirconia‐based single‐implant restorations: 5‐year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
por: Lamperti, Sofia T., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained
por: Lee, Jae-Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study
por: Hidalgo, Jazmin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Clinical outcome of double crown-retained implant overdentures with zirconia primary crowns
por: Rinke, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non‐original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5‐year results of a prospective cohort study
por: Strauss, Franz J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)