Cargando…

Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher

Although the rates of disease gene discovery have steadily increased with the expanding use of genome and exome sequencing by clinical and research laboratories, only ~16% of genes in the genome have confirmed disease associations. Here we describe our clinical laboratory's experience utilizing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Towne, Meghan C., Rossi, Mari, Wayburn, Bess, Huang, Jennifer M., Radtke, Kelly, Alcaraz, Wendy, Farwell Hagman, Kelly D., Shinde, Deepali N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24342
_version_ 1784754157773651968
author Towne, Meghan C.
Rossi, Mari
Wayburn, Bess
Huang, Jennifer M.
Radtke, Kelly
Alcaraz, Wendy
Farwell Hagman, Kelly D.
Shinde, Deepali N.
author_facet Towne, Meghan C.
Rossi, Mari
Wayburn, Bess
Huang, Jennifer M.
Radtke, Kelly
Alcaraz, Wendy
Farwell Hagman, Kelly D.
Shinde, Deepali N.
author_sort Towne, Meghan C.
collection PubMed
description Although the rates of disease gene discovery have steadily increased with the expanding use of genome and exome sequencing by clinical and research laboratories, only ~16% of genes in the genome have confirmed disease associations. Here we describe our clinical laboratory's experience utilizing GeneMatcher, an online portal designed to promote disease gene discovery and data sharing. Since 2016, we submitted 246 candidates from 243 unique genes to GeneMatcher, of which 111 (45%) are now clinically characterized. Submissions meeting our candidate gene‐reporting criteria based on a scoring system using patient and molecular‐weighted evidence were significantly more likely to be characterized as of October 2021 versus genes that did not meet our clinical‐reporting criteria (p = 0.025). We reported relevant findings related to these newly characterized gene–disease associations in 477 probands. In 218 (46%) instances, we issued reclassifications after an initial negative or candidate gene (uncertain) report. We coauthored 104 publications delineating gene–disease relationships, including descriptions of new associations (60%), additional supportive evidence (13%), subsequent descriptive cohorts (23%), and phenotypic expansions (4%). Clinical laboratories are pivotal for disease gene discovery efforts and can screen phenotypes based on genotype matches, contact clinicians of relevant cases, and issue proactive reclassification reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93137812022-07-30 Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher Towne, Meghan C. Rossi, Mari Wayburn, Bess Huang, Jennifer M. Radtke, Kelly Alcaraz, Wendy Farwell Hagman, Kelly D. Shinde, Deepali N. Hum Mutat Informatics Although the rates of disease gene discovery have steadily increased with the expanding use of genome and exome sequencing by clinical and research laboratories, only ~16% of genes in the genome have confirmed disease associations. Here we describe our clinical laboratory's experience utilizing GeneMatcher, an online portal designed to promote disease gene discovery and data sharing. Since 2016, we submitted 246 candidates from 243 unique genes to GeneMatcher, of which 111 (45%) are now clinically characterized. Submissions meeting our candidate gene‐reporting criteria based on a scoring system using patient and molecular‐weighted evidence were significantly more likely to be characterized as of October 2021 versus genes that did not meet our clinical‐reporting criteria (p = 0.025). We reported relevant findings related to these newly characterized gene–disease associations in 477 probands. In 218 (46%) instances, we issued reclassifications after an initial negative or candidate gene (uncertain) report. We coauthored 104 publications delineating gene–disease relationships, including descriptions of new associations (60%), additional supportive evidence (13%), subsequent descriptive cohorts (23%), and phenotypic expansions (4%). Clinical laboratories are pivotal for disease gene discovery efforts and can screen phenotypes based on genotype matches, contact clinicians of relevant cases, and issue proactive reclassification reports. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-02 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9313781/ /pubmed/35143109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24342 Text en © 2022 Ambry Genetics Corporation. Human Mutation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Informatics
Towne, Meghan C.
Rossi, Mari
Wayburn, Bess
Huang, Jennifer M.
Radtke, Kelly
Alcaraz, Wendy
Farwell Hagman, Kelly D.
Shinde, Deepali N.
Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher
title Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher
title_full Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher
title_fullStr Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher
title_short Diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with GeneMatcher
title_sort diagnostic testing laboratories are valuable partners for disease gene discovery: 5‐year experience with genematcher
topic Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24342
work_keys_str_mv AT townemeghanc diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher
AT rossimari diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher
AT wayburnbess diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher
AT huangjenniferm diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher
AT radtkekelly diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher
AT alcarazwendy diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher
AT farwellhagmankellyd diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher
AT shindedeepalin diagnostictestinglaboratoriesarevaluablepartnersfordiseasegenediscovery5yearexperiencewithgenematcher