Cargando…
Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020
Regulatory qualification of biomarkers facilitates their harmonized use across drug developers, enabling more personalized medicine. This study reviews various aspects of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) biomarker qualification procedure, including frequency and outcome, common challenges, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2554 |
_version_ | 1784754177996488704 |
---|---|
author | Bakker, Elisabeth Hendrikse, Natalie M. Ehmann, Falk van der Meer, Daniëlla S. Llinares Garcia, Jordi Vetter, Thorsten Starokozhko, Viktoriia Mol, Peter G.M. |
author_facet | Bakker, Elisabeth Hendrikse, Natalie M. Ehmann, Falk van der Meer, Daniëlla S. Llinares Garcia, Jordi Vetter, Thorsten Starokozhko, Viktoriia Mol, Peter G.M. |
author_sort | Bakker, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Regulatory qualification of biomarkers facilitates their harmonized use across drug developers, enabling more personalized medicine. This study reviews various aspects of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) biomarker qualification procedure, including frequency and outcome, common challenges, and biomarker characteristics. Our findings provide insights into the EMA’s biomarker qualification process and will thereby support future applications. All biomarker‐related “Qualification of Novel Methodologies for Medicine Development” procedures that started from 2008 to 2020 were included. Procedural data were extracted from relevant documents and analyzed descriptively. In total, 86 biomarker qualification procedures were identified, of which 13 resulted in qualified biomarkers. Whereas initially many biomarker qualification procedures were linked to a single company and specific drug development program, a shift was observed to qualification efforts by consortia. Most biomarkers were proposed (n = 45) and qualified (n = 9) for use in patient selection, stratification, and/or enrichment, followed by efficacy biomarkers (37 proposed, 4 qualified). Overall, many issues were raised during qualification procedures, mostly related to biomarker properties and assay validation (in 79% and 77% of all procedures, respectively). Issues related to the proposed context of use and rationale were least common yet were still raised in 54% of all procedures. While few qualified biomarkers are currently available, procedures focus increasingly on biomarkers for general use instead of those linked to specific drug compounds. The issues raised during qualification procedures illustrate the thorough discussions taking place between applicants and regulators—highlighting aspects that need careful consideration and underlining the importance of an appropriate validation strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9313861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93138612022-07-27 Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 Bakker, Elisabeth Hendrikse, Natalie M. Ehmann, Falk van der Meer, Daniëlla S. Llinares Garcia, Jordi Vetter, Thorsten Starokozhko, Viktoriia Mol, Peter G.M. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Regulatory qualification of biomarkers facilitates their harmonized use across drug developers, enabling more personalized medicine. This study reviews various aspects of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) biomarker qualification procedure, including frequency and outcome, common challenges, and biomarker characteristics. Our findings provide insights into the EMA’s biomarker qualification process and will thereby support future applications. All biomarker‐related “Qualification of Novel Methodologies for Medicine Development” procedures that started from 2008 to 2020 were included. Procedural data were extracted from relevant documents and analyzed descriptively. In total, 86 biomarker qualification procedures were identified, of which 13 resulted in qualified biomarkers. Whereas initially many biomarker qualification procedures were linked to a single company and specific drug development program, a shift was observed to qualification efforts by consortia. Most biomarkers were proposed (n = 45) and qualified (n = 9) for use in patient selection, stratification, and/or enrichment, followed by efficacy biomarkers (37 proposed, 4 qualified). Overall, many issues were raised during qualification procedures, mostly related to biomarker properties and assay validation (in 79% and 77% of all procedures, respectively). Issues related to the proposed context of use and rationale were least common yet were still raised in 54% of all procedures. While few qualified biomarkers are currently available, procedures focus increasingly on biomarkers for general use instead of those linked to specific drug compounds. The issues raised during qualification procedures illustrate the thorough discussions taking place between applicants and regulators—highlighting aspects that need careful consideration and underlining the importance of an appropriate validation strategy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-05 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9313861/ /pubmed/35137949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2554 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Bakker, Elisabeth Hendrikse, Natalie M. Ehmann, Falk van der Meer, Daniëlla S. Llinares Garcia, Jordi Vetter, Thorsten Starokozhko, Viktoriia Mol, Peter G.M. Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 |
title | Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 |
title_full | Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 |
title_fullStr | Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 |
title_short | Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 |
title_sort | biomarker qualification at the european medicines agency: a review of biomarker qualification procedures from 2008 to 2020 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakkerelisabeth biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 AT hendriksenataliem biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 AT ehmannfalk biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 AT vandermeerdaniellas biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 AT llinaresgarciajordi biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 AT vetterthorsten biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 AT starokozhkoviktoriia biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 AT molpetergm biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020 |