Cargando…

Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020

Regulatory qualification of biomarkers facilitates their harmonized use across drug developers, enabling more personalized medicine. This study reviews various aspects of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) biomarker qualification procedure, including frequency and outcome, common challenges, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakker, Elisabeth, Hendrikse, Natalie M., Ehmann, Falk, van der Meer, Daniëlla S., Llinares Garcia, Jordi, Vetter, Thorsten, Starokozhko, Viktoriia, Mol, Peter G.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2554
_version_ 1784754177996488704
author Bakker, Elisabeth
Hendrikse, Natalie M.
Ehmann, Falk
van der Meer, Daniëlla S.
Llinares Garcia, Jordi
Vetter, Thorsten
Starokozhko, Viktoriia
Mol, Peter G.M.
author_facet Bakker, Elisabeth
Hendrikse, Natalie M.
Ehmann, Falk
van der Meer, Daniëlla S.
Llinares Garcia, Jordi
Vetter, Thorsten
Starokozhko, Viktoriia
Mol, Peter G.M.
author_sort Bakker, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description Regulatory qualification of biomarkers facilitates their harmonized use across drug developers, enabling more personalized medicine. This study reviews various aspects of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) biomarker qualification procedure, including frequency and outcome, common challenges, and biomarker characteristics. Our findings provide insights into the EMA’s biomarker qualification process and will thereby support future applications. All biomarker‐related “Qualification of Novel Methodologies for Medicine Development” procedures that started from 2008 to 2020 were included. Procedural data were extracted from relevant documents and analyzed descriptively. In total, 86 biomarker qualification procedures were identified, of which 13 resulted in qualified biomarkers. Whereas initially many biomarker qualification procedures were linked to a single company and specific drug development program, a shift was observed to qualification efforts by consortia. Most biomarkers were proposed (n = 45) and qualified (n = 9) for use in patient selection, stratification, and/or enrichment, followed by efficacy biomarkers (37 proposed, 4 qualified). Overall, many issues were raised during qualification procedures, mostly related to biomarker properties and assay validation (in 79% and 77% of all procedures, respectively). Issues related to the proposed context of use and rationale were least common yet were still raised in 54% of all procedures. While few qualified biomarkers are currently available, procedures focus increasingly on biomarkers for general use instead of those linked to specific drug compounds. The issues raised during qualification procedures illustrate the thorough discussions taking place between applicants and regulators—highlighting aspects that need careful consideration and underlining the importance of an appropriate validation strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9313861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93138612022-07-27 Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020 Bakker, Elisabeth Hendrikse, Natalie M. Ehmann, Falk van der Meer, Daniëlla S. Llinares Garcia, Jordi Vetter, Thorsten Starokozhko, Viktoriia Mol, Peter G.M. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Regulatory qualification of biomarkers facilitates their harmonized use across drug developers, enabling more personalized medicine. This study reviews various aspects of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) biomarker qualification procedure, including frequency and outcome, common challenges, and biomarker characteristics. Our findings provide insights into the EMA’s biomarker qualification process and will thereby support future applications. All biomarker‐related “Qualification of Novel Methodologies for Medicine Development” procedures that started from 2008 to 2020 were included. Procedural data were extracted from relevant documents and analyzed descriptively. In total, 86 biomarker qualification procedures were identified, of which 13 resulted in qualified biomarkers. Whereas initially many biomarker qualification procedures were linked to a single company and specific drug development program, a shift was observed to qualification efforts by consortia. Most biomarkers were proposed (n = 45) and qualified (n = 9) for use in patient selection, stratification, and/or enrichment, followed by efficacy biomarkers (37 proposed, 4 qualified). Overall, many issues were raised during qualification procedures, mostly related to biomarker properties and assay validation (in 79% and 77% of all procedures, respectively). Issues related to the proposed context of use and rationale were least common yet were still raised in 54% of all procedures. While few qualified biomarkers are currently available, procedures focus increasingly on biomarkers for general use instead of those linked to specific drug compounds. The issues raised during qualification procedures illustrate the thorough discussions taking place between applicants and regulators—highlighting aspects that need careful consideration and underlining the importance of an appropriate validation strategy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-05 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9313861/ /pubmed/35137949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2554 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Bakker, Elisabeth
Hendrikse, Natalie M.
Ehmann, Falk
van der Meer, Daniëlla S.
Llinares Garcia, Jordi
Vetter, Thorsten
Starokozhko, Viktoriia
Mol, Peter G.M.
Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020
title Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020
title_full Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020
title_fullStr Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020
title_short Biomarker Qualification at the European Medicines Agency: A Review of Biomarker Qualification Procedures From 2008 to 2020
title_sort biomarker qualification at the european medicines agency: a review of biomarker qualification procedures from 2008 to 2020
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9313861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2554
work_keys_str_mv AT bakkerelisabeth biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020
AT hendriksenataliem biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020
AT ehmannfalk biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020
AT vandermeerdaniellas biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020
AT llinaresgarciajordi biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020
AT vetterthorsten biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020
AT starokozhkoviktoriia biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020
AT molpetergm biomarkerqualificationattheeuropeanmedicinesagencyareviewofbiomarkerqualificationproceduresfrom2008to2020