Cargando…

Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xingqu, Guo, Ping, Yang, Li, Liu, Zhuoling, Yu, Deshui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9541060
_version_ 1784754253751910400
author Chen, Xingqu
Guo, Ping
Yang, Li
Liu, Zhuoling
Yu, Deshui
author_facet Chen, Xingqu
Guo, Ping
Yang, Li
Liu, Zhuoling
Yu, Deshui
author_sort Chen, Xingqu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in our hospital from June 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. The cases were randomly assigned into research group and control group. The control group received propofol anesthesia (n = 49), and the research group received ciprofol anesthesia (n = 47). The patients, physician satisfaction, vital signs, incidence of adverse reactions, anesthetic first dose, additional time, additional dose, total dose, induction time, insertion time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, leaving room time, and injection pain score were compared. RESULTS: The overall satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). After taking medicine, the score of 1 min and MAP in the study group were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The satisfaction of doctors in the study group was higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The anesthesia induction time, intubation time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, and leaving room time in the study group were significantly longer than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The incidence and degree of injection pain in the propofol group were significantly lower than those in the propofol group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In painless gastroenteroscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol is equally safe and effective for patients and will not cause early cognitive dysfunction after operation, which is a good choice in painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia. In addition, ciprofol has significant advantages in patient and physician satisfaction, especially in injection pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2100045400.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9314164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93141642022-08-05 Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia Chen, Xingqu Guo, Ping Yang, Li Liu, Zhuoling Yu, Deshui Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in our hospital from June 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. The cases were randomly assigned into research group and control group. The control group received propofol anesthesia (n = 49), and the research group received ciprofol anesthesia (n = 47). The patients, physician satisfaction, vital signs, incidence of adverse reactions, anesthetic first dose, additional time, additional dose, total dose, induction time, insertion time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, leaving room time, and injection pain score were compared. RESULTS: The overall satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). After taking medicine, the score of 1 min and MAP in the study group were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The satisfaction of doctors in the study group was higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The anesthesia induction time, intubation time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, and leaving room time in the study group were significantly longer than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The incidence and degree of injection pain in the propofol group were significantly lower than those in the propofol group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In painless gastroenteroscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol is equally safe and effective for patients and will not cause early cognitive dysfunction after operation, which is a good choice in painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia. In addition, ciprofol has significant advantages in patient and physician satisfaction, especially in injection pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2100045400. Hindawi 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9314164/ /pubmed/35935320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9541060 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xingqu Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Xingqu
Guo, Ping
Yang, Li
Liu, Zhuoling
Yu, Deshui
Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
title Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
title_full Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
title_short Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
title_sort comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol in intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients under painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9541060
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxingqu comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia
AT guoping comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia
AT yangli comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia
AT liuzhuoling comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia
AT yudeshui comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia