Cargando…
Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscop...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9541060 |
_version_ | 1784754253751910400 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Xingqu Guo, Ping Yang, Li Liu, Zhuoling Yu, Deshui |
author_facet | Chen, Xingqu Guo, Ping Yang, Li Liu, Zhuoling Yu, Deshui |
author_sort | Chen, Xingqu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in our hospital from June 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. The cases were randomly assigned into research group and control group. The control group received propofol anesthesia (n = 49), and the research group received ciprofol anesthesia (n = 47). The patients, physician satisfaction, vital signs, incidence of adverse reactions, anesthetic first dose, additional time, additional dose, total dose, induction time, insertion time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, leaving room time, and injection pain score were compared. RESULTS: The overall satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). After taking medicine, the score of 1 min and MAP in the study group were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The satisfaction of doctors in the study group was higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The anesthesia induction time, intubation time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, and leaving room time in the study group were significantly longer than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The incidence and degree of injection pain in the propofol group were significantly lower than those in the propofol group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In painless gastroenteroscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol is equally safe and effective for patients and will not cause early cognitive dysfunction after operation, which is a good choice in painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia. In addition, ciprofol has significant advantages in patient and physician satisfaction, especially in injection pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2100045400. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9314164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93141642022-08-05 Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia Chen, Xingqu Guo, Ping Yang, Li Liu, Zhuoling Yu, Deshui Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in our hospital from June 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. The cases were randomly assigned into research group and control group. The control group received propofol anesthesia (n = 49), and the research group received ciprofol anesthesia (n = 47). The patients, physician satisfaction, vital signs, incidence of adverse reactions, anesthetic first dose, additional time, additional dose, total dose, induction time, insertion time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, leaving room time, and injection pain score were compared. RESULTS: The overall satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). After taking medicine, the score of 1 min and MAP in the study group were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The satisfaction of doctors in the study group was higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The anesthesia induction time, intubation time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, and leaving room time in the study group were significantly longer than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The incidence and degree of injection pain in the propofol group were significantly lower than those in the propofol group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In painless gastroenteroscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol is equally safe and effective for patients and will not cause early cognitive dysfunction after operation, which is a good choice in painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia. In addition, ciprofol has significant advantages in patient and physician satisfaction, especially in injection pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2100045400. Hindawi 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9314164/ /pubmed/35935320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9541060 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xingqu Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Xingqu Guo, Ping Yang, Li Liu, Zhuoling Yu, Deshui Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia |
title | Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia |
title_full | Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia |
title_short | Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia |
title_sort | comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol in intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients under painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9541060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenxingqu comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia AT guoping comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia AT yangli comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia AT liuzhuoling comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia AT yudeshui comparisonandclinicalvalueofciprofolandpropofolinintraoperativeadversereactionsoperationresuscitationandsatisfactionofpatientsunderpainlessgastroenteroscopyanesthesia |