Cargando…
Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review
INTRODUCTION: Neurofeedback training is increasingly applied as a therapeutic tool in a variety of disorders, with growing scientific and clinical interest in the last two decades. Different Neurofeedback approaches have been developed over time, so it is now important to be able to distinguish betw...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.920659 |
_version_ | 1784754348342902784 |
---|---|
author | Bazzana, Fabian Finzi, Sarah Di Fini, Giulia Veglia, Fabio |
author_facet | Bazzana, Fabian Finzi, Sarah Di Fini, Giulia Veglia, Fabio |
author_sort | Bazzana, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Neurofeedback training is increasingly applied as a therapeutic tool in a variety of disorders, with growing scientific and clinical interest in the last two decades. Different Neurofeedback approaches have been developed over time, so it is now important to be able to distinguish between them and investigate the effectiveness and efficiency characteristics of each specific protocol. In this study we intend to examine the effects of Neurofeedback based on slow brain activity, the so-called Infra-Low Frequency (ILF) training a recently developed methodology that seems promising for the regulation of the central nervous system. AIMS: With this review we intend to summarize the currently existing literature on ILF-Neurofeedback, examine its quality and formulate indications about the clinical effectiveness of ILF-Neurofeedback. METHODS: Literature search was first conducted according to PRISMA principles, described, and then assessed using the MMAT appraisal tool. 18 well-documented studies of ILF-Neurofeedback training in human subjects were picked up and analyzed. Reports include group interventions as well as single case studies. RESULTS: Research data indicates good potential for ILF-Neurofeedback to influence brain activity and neurovegetative parameters. From the clinical profile, a salient common observation is a high level of individualization as a specific characteristic of ILF-Training: this feature seems to correlate with effectiveness of ILF-Neurofeedback, but also poses a challenge for researchers in terms of producing controlled and comparable findings; according to this point, some recommendation for future research on ILF-Neurofeedback are proposed. In conclusion, ILF-neurofeedback shows great potential for application for all those conditions in which the regulation of brain activity and neurophysiological processes are crucial. Further research will make it possible to complete the available data and to have a broader overview of its possible applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9314572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93145722022-07-27 Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review Bazzana, Fabian Finzi, Sarah Di Fini, Giulia Veglia, Fabio Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Neurofeedback training is increasingly applied as a therapeutic tool in a variety of disorders, with growing scientific and clinical interest in the last two decades. Different Neurofeedback approaches have been developed over time, so it is now important to be able to distinguish between them and investigate the effectiveness and efficiency characteristics of each specific protocol. In this study we intend to examine the effects of Neurofeedback based on slow brain activity, the so-called Infra-Low Frequency (ILF) training a recently developed methodology that seems promising for the regulation of the central nervous system. AIMS: With this review we intend to summarize the currently existing literature on ILF-Neurofeedback, examine its quality and formulate indications about the clinical effectiveness of ILF-Neurofeedback. METHODS: Literature search was first conducted according to PRISMA principles, described, and then assessed using the MMAT appraisal tool. 18 well-documented studies of ILF-Neurofeedback training in human subjects were picked up and analyzed. Reports include group interventions as well as single case studies. RESULTS: Research data indicates good potential for ILF-Neurofeedback to influence brain activity and neurovegetative parameters. From the clinical profile, a salient common observation is a high level of individualization as a specific characteristic of ILF-Training: this feature seems to correlate with effectiveness of ILF-Neurofeedback, but also poses a challenge for researchers in terms of producing controlled and comparable findings; according to this point, some recommendation for future research on ILF-Neurofeedback are proposed. In conclusion, ILF-neurofeedback shows great potential for application for all those conditions in which the regulation of brain activity and neurophysiological processes are crucial. Further research will make it possible to complete the available data and to have a broader overview of its possible applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9314572/ /pubmed/35903788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.920659 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bazzana, Finzi, Di Fini and Veglia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Bazzana, Fabian Finzi, Sarah Di Fini, Giulia Veglia, Fabio Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review |
title | Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review |
title_full | Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review |
title_fullStr | Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review |
title_short | Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review |
title_sort | infra-low frequency neurofeedback: a systematic mixed studies review |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.920659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bazzanafabian infralowfrequencyneurofeedbackasystematicmixedstudiesreview AT finzisarah infralowfrequencyneurofeedbackasystematicmixedstudiesreview AT difinigiulia infralowfrequencyneurofeedbackasystematicmixedstudiesreview AT vegliafabio infralowfrequencyneurofeedbackasystematicmixedstudiesreview |