Cargando…

Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Underrepresentation of females in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limits generalizability and quality of the evidence guiding treatment of females. This study aimed to measure the sex disparities in participants' recruitment in RCTs of atrial fibrillation (AF) and determine asso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noubiap, Jean Jacques, Thomas, Gijo, Nyaga, Ulrich Flore, Fitzgerald, John L., Gallagher, Celine, Middeldorp, Melissa E., Sanders, Prashanthan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15421
_version_ 1784754377104293888
author Noubiap, Jean Jacques
Thomas, Gijo
Nyaga, Ulrich Flore
Fitzgerald, John L.
Gallagher, Celine
Middeldorp, Melissa E.
Sanders, Prashanthan
author_facet Noubiap, Jean Jacques
Thomas, Gijo
Nyaga, Ulrich Flore
Fitzgerald, John L.
Gallagher, Celine
Middeldorp, Melissa E.
Sanders, Prashanthan
author_sort Noubiap, Jean Jacques
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Underrepresentation of females in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limits generalizability and quality of the evidence guiding treatment of females. This study aimed to measure the sex disparities in participants' recruitment in RCTs of atrial fibrillation (AF) and determine associated factors, and to describe the frequency of outcomes reported by sex. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched to identify RCTs of AF published between January 1, 2011, and November 20, 2021, in 12 top‐tier journals. We measured the enrollment of females using the enrollment disparity difference (EDD) which is the difference between the proportion of females in the trial and the proportion of females with AF in the underlying general population (obtained from the Global Burden of Disease). Random‐effects meta‐analyses of the EDD were performed, and multivariable meta‐regression was used to explore factors associated with disparity estimates. We also determined the proportion of trials that included sex‐stratified results. RESULTS: Out of 1133 records screened, 142 trials were included, reporting on a total of 133 532 participants. The random‐effects summary EDD was −0.125 (95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.143 to −0.108), indicating that females were under‐enrolled by 12.5 percentage points. Female enrollment was higher in trials with higher sample size (<250 vs. >750, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.065, 95% CI: 1.008–1.125), higher mean participants' age (aOR: 1.006, 95% CI: 1.002–1.009), and lower in trials conducted in North America compared to Europe (aOR: 0.945, 95% CI: 0.898–0.995). Only 36 trials (25.4%) reported outcomes by sex, and of these 29 (80.6%) performed statistical testing of the sex‐by‐treatment interaction. CONCLUSION: Females remain substantially less represented in RCTs of AF, and sex‐stratified reporting of primary outcomes is infrequent. These findings call for urgent action to improve sex equity in enrollment and sex‐stratified outcomes' reporting in RCTs of AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9314686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93146862022-07-30 Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation Noubiap, Jean Jacques Thomas, Gijo Nyaga, Ulrich Flore Fitzgerald, John L. Gallagher, Celine Middeldorp, Melissa E. Sanders, Prashanthan J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Underrepresentation of females in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limits generalizability and quality of the evidence guiding treatment of females. This study aimed to measure the sex disparities in participants' recruitment in RCTs of atrial fibrillation (AF) and determine associated factors, and to describe the frequency of outcomes reported by sex. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched to identify RCTs of AF published between January 1, 2011, and November 20, 2021, in 12 top‐tier journals. We measured the enrollment of females using the enrollment disparity difference (EDD) which is the difference between the proportion of females in the trial and the proportion of females with AF in the underlying general population (obtained from the Global Burden of Disease). Random‐effects meta‐analyses of the EDD were performed, and multivariable meta‐regression was used to explore factors associated with disparity estimates. We also determined the proportion of trials that included sex‐stratified results. RESULTS: Out of 1133 records screened, 142 trials were included, reporting on a total of 133 532 participants. The random‐effects summary EDD was −0.125 (95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.143 to −0.108), indicating that females were under‐enrolled by 12.5 percentage points. Female enrollment was higher in trials with higher sample size (<250 vs. >750, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.065, 95% CI: 1.008–1.125), higher mean participants' age (aOR: 1.006, 95% CI: 1.002–1.009), and lower in trials conducted in North America compared to Europe (aOR: 0.945, 95% CI: 0.898–0.995). Only 36 trials (25.4%) reported outcomes by sex, and of these 29 (80.6%) performed statistical testing of the sex‐by‐treatment interaction. CONCLUSION: Females remain substantially less represented in RCTs of AF, and sex‐stratified reporting of primary outcomes is infrequent. These findings call for urgent action to improve sex equity in enrollment and sex‐stratified outcomes' reporting in RCTs of AF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-06 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9314686/ /pubmed/35178812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15421 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Noubiap, Jean Jacques
Thomas, Gijo
Nyaga, Ulrich Flore
Fitzgerald, John L.
Gallagher, Celine
Middeldorp, Melissa E.
Sanders, Prashanthan
Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation
title Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation
title_full Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation
title_short Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation
title_sort sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15421
work_keys_str_mv AT noubiapjeanjacques sexdisparitiesinenrollmentandreportingofoutcomesbysexincontemporaryclinicaltrialsofatrialfibrillation
AT thomasgijo sexdisparitiesinenrollmentandreportingofoutcomesbysexincontemporaryclinicaltrialsofatrialfibrillation
AT nyagaulrichflore sexdisparitiesinenrollmentandreportingofoutcomesbysexincontemporaryclinicaltrialsofatrialfibrillation
AT fitzgeraldjohnl sexdisparitiesinenrollmentandreportingofoutcomesbysexincontemporaryclinicaltrialsofatrialfibrillation
AT gallagherceline sexdisparitiesinenrollmentandreportingofoutcomesbysexincontemporaryclinicaltrialsofatrialfibrillation
AT middeldorpmelissae sexdisparitiesinenrollmentandreportingofoutcomesbysexincontemporaryclinicaltrialsofatrialfibrillation
AT sandersprashanthan sexdisparitiesinenrollmentandreportingofoutcomesbysexincontemporaryclinicaltrialsofatrialfibrillation