Cargando…
Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review
PURPOSE: Despite billions of doctor visits worldwide each year, little is known on whether doctors themselves affect patients’ physical health after accounting for intervention and confounders such as patients’ and doctors’ data, hospital effects, nor how strong that doctors’ effect is. Knowledge of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903086 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S372464 |
_version_ | 1784754394779090944 |
---|---|
author | Schnelle, Christoph Clark, Justin Mascord, Rachel Jones, Mark A |
author_facet | Schnelle, Christoph Clark, Justin Mascord, Rachel Jones, Mark A |
author_sort | Schnelle, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Despite billions of doctor visits worldwide each year, little is known on whether doctors themselves affect patients’ physical health after accounting for intervention and confounders such as patients’ and doctors’ data, hospital effects, nor how strong that doctors’ effect is. Knowledge of surgeons’ and psychotherapists’ effects exists, but not for 102 other medical specialties notwithstanding the importance of such knowledge. METHODS: Eligibility Criteria: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control, and cohort studies including medical doctors except surgeons for any intervention, reporting the proportion of variance in patients’ outcomes owing to the doctors (random effects), or the fixed effects of grading doctors by outcomes, after multivariate adjustment. Exclusions: studies of <15 doctors or solely reporting doctors’ effects for known variables. SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, inception to June 2020. Manual search for papers referring/referred to by resulting studies. RISK OF BIAS: Using Newcastle–Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Despite all medical interventions bar surgery being eligible, only thirty cohort papers were found, covering 36,239 doctors, with 10 specialties, 21 interventions, 60 outcomes (17 unique). Studies reported doctors’ effects by grading doctors from best to worst, or by diversely calculating the doctor-attributed percentage of patients’ outcome variation, ie the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Sixteen studies presented fixed effects, 18 random effects, and 3 another approach. No RCTs found. Thirteen studies reported exceptionally good and/or poor performers with confidence intervals wholly outside the average performance. ICC range 0 to 33%, mean 3.9%. Highly diverse reporting, meta-analysis therefore not applicable. CONCLUSION: Doctors, on their own, can affect patients’ physical health for many interventions and outcomes. Effects range from negligible to substantial, even after accounting for all known variables. Many published cohorts may reveal valuable information by reanalyzing their data for doctors’ effects. Positive and negative doctor outliers appear regularly. Therefore, it can matter which doctor is chosen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9314759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93147592022-07-27 Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review Schnelle, Christoph Clark, Justin Mascord, Rachel Jones, Mark A Ther Clin Risk Manag Review PURPOSE: Despite billions of doctor visits worldwide each year, little is known on whether doctors themselves affect patients’ physical health after accounting for intervention and confounders such as patients’ and doctors’ data, hospital effects, nor how strong that doctors’ effect is. Knowledge of surgeons’ and psychotherapists’ effects exists, but not for 102 other medical specialties notwithstanding the importance of such knowledge. METHODS: Eligibility Criteria: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control, and cohort studies including medical doctors except surgeons for any intervention, reporting the proportion of variance in patients’ outcomes owing to the doctors (random effects), or the fixed effects of grading doctors by outcomes, after multivariate adjustment. Exclusions: studies of <15 doctors or solely reporting doctors’ effects for known variables. SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, inception to June 2020. Manual search for papers referring/referred to by resulting studies. RISK OF BIAS: Using Newcastle–Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Despite all medical interventions bar surgery being eligible, only thirty cohort papers were found, covering 36,239 doctors, with 10 specialties, 21 interventions, 60 outcomes (17 unique). Studies reported doctors’ effects by grading doctors from best to worst, or by diversely calculating the doctor-attributed percentage of patients’ outcome variation, ie the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Sixteen studies presented fixed effects, 18 random effects, and 3 another approach. No RCTs found. Thirteen studies reported exceptionally good and/or poor performers with confidence intervals wholly outside the average performance. ICC range 0 to 33%, mean 3.9%. Highly diverse reporting, meta-analysis therefore not applicable. CONCLUSION: Doctors, on their own, can affect patients’ physical health for many interventions and outcomes. Effects range from negligible to substantial, even after accounting for all known variables. Many published cohorts may reveal valuable information by reanalyzing their data for doctors’ effects. Positive and negative doctor outliers appear regularly. Therefore, it can matter which doctor is chosen. Dove 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9314759/ /pubmed/35903086 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S372464 Text en © 2022 Schnelle et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Schnelle, Christoph Clark, Justin Mascord, Rachel Jones, Mark A Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review |
title | Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review |
title_full | Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review |
title_short | Is There a Doctors’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | is there a doctors’ effect on patients’ physical health, beyond the intervention and all known factors? a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903086 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S372464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnellechristoph isthereadoctorseffectonpatientsphysicalhealthbeyondtheinterventionandallknownfactorsasystematicreview AT clarkjustin isthereadoctorseffectonpatientsphysicalhealthbeyondtheinterventionandallknownfactorsasystematicreview AT mascordrachel isthereadoctorseffectonpatientsphysicalhealthbeyondtheinterventionandallknownfactorsasystematicreview AT jonesmarka isthereadoctorseffectonpatientsphysicalhealthbeyondtheinterventionandallknownfactorsasystematicreview |