Cargando…

Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: This study explored consumers' perspectives on self‐monitoring, a common feature in behavioral interventions that helps inform consumers' progress and answer their questions, to learn what outcome metrics matter to consumers and whether self‐selection of these metrics leads to g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jianyi, Munson, Sean A., Chang, Angela, Voss, Claire, Graham, Andrea K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23700
_version_ 1784754422289530880
author Liu, Jianyi
Munson, Sean A.
Chang, Angela
Voss, Claire
Graham, Andrea K.
author_facet Liu, Jianyi
Munson, Sean A.
Chang, Angela
Voss, Claire
Graham, Andrea K.
author_sort Liu, Jianyi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study explored consumers' perspectives on self‐monitoring, a common feature in behavioral interventions that helps inform consumers' progress and answer their questions, to learn what outcome metrics matter to consumers and whether self‐selection of these metrics leads to greater engagement (i.e., compliance, satisfaction) in self‐monitoring than monitoring only default options. METHODS: In a proof‐of‐concept randomized trial, 48 adult participants were randomly assigned to “clinician‐determined monitoring” or “clinician + self‐determined monitoring” conditions. Before starting monitoring, all participants shared outcomes that would matter to them in a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management. Then, for 3 weeks, participants in the “clinician‐determined” condition monitored their weight and binge‐eating episodes, and participants in the “clinician + self‐determined” condition monitored these and another metric of their choosing. After, satisfaction and compliance were assessed. RESULTS: Participants identified 116 metrics, grouped into 12 themes, that mattered to them. During monitoring, participants in the “clinician + self‐determined” condition monitored 41 metrics. Surprisingly, participants in the “clinician‐determined” condition also monitored metrics besides weight and binge eating. This resulted in a failure of our experimental manipulation, which represents a significant limitation of this research. No significant differences emerged in satisfaction or compliance between conditions. DISCUSSION: Although our proof‐of‐concept trial yielded null quantitative results, findings also suggested binge eating and weight management interventions may benefit from including an individually customizable monitoring option in addition to default metrics, warranting testing in future research. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Examining consumers' self‐monitoring preferences for a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management revealed a variety of metrics that matter to consumers, although binge eating and weight were still most valued. Findings from our proof‐of‐concept trial suggest design implications of encouraging an individually customizable monitoring option, in addition to default metrics, which needs to be tested in future research over a longer period and during actual mobile intervention delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9314870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93148702022-07-30 Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial Liu, Jianyi Munson, Sean A. Chang, Angela Voss, Claire Graham, Andrea K. Int J Eat Disord Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This study explored consumers' perspectives on self‐monitoring, a common feature in behavioral interventions that helps inform consumers' progress and answer their questions, to learn what outcome metrics matter to consumers and whether self‐selection of these metrics leads to greater engagement (i.e., compliance, satisfaction) in self‐monitoring than monitoring only default options. METHODS: In a proof‐of‐concept randomized trial, 48 adult participants were randomly assigned to “clinician‐determined monitoring” or “clinician + self‐determined monitoring” conditions. Before starting monitoring, all participants shared outcomes that would matter to them in a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management. Then, for 3 weeks, participants in the “clinician‐determined” condition monitored their weight and binge‐eating episodes, and participants in the “clinician + self‐determined” condition monitored these and another metric of their choosing. After, satisfaction and compliance were assessed. RESULTS: Participants identified 116 metrics, grouped into 12 themes, that mattered to them. During monitoring, participants in the “clinician + self‐determined” condition monitored 41 metrics. Surprisingly, participants in the “clinician‐determined” condition also monitored metrics besides weight and binge eating. This resulted in a failure of our experimental manipulation, which represents a significant limitation of this research. No significant differences emerged in satisfaction or compliance between conditions. DISCUSSION: Although our proof‐of‐concept trial yielded null quantitative results, findings also suggested binge eating and weight management interventions may benefit from including an individually customizable monitoring option in addition to default metrics, warranting testing in future research. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Examining consumers' self‐monitoring preferences for a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management revealed a variety of metrics that matter to consumers, although binge eating and weight were still most valued. Findings from our proof‐of‐concept trial suggest design implications of encouraging an individually customizable monitoring option, in addition to default metrics, which needs to be tested in future research over a longer period and during actual mobile intervention delivery. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-03-12 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9314870/ /pubmed/35277986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23700 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Liu, Jianyi
Munson, Sean A.
Chang, Angela
Voss, Claire
Graham, Andrea K.
Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial
title Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial
title_full Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial
title_fullStr Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial
title_short Understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof‐of‐concept randomized trial
title_sort understanding self‐monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: a proof‐of‐concept randomized trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23700
work_keys_str_mv AT liujianyi understandingselfmonitoringtoinformamobileinterventionforbingeeatingandweightmanagementaproofofconceptrandomizedtrial
AT munsonseana understandingselfmonitoringtoinformamobileinterventionforbingeeatingandweightmanagementaproofofconceptrandomizedtrial
AT changangela understandingselfmonitoringtoinformamobileinterventionforbingeeatingandweightmanagementaproofofconceptrandomizedtrial
AT vossclaire understandingselfmonitoringtoinformamobileinterventionforbingeeatingandweightmanagementaproofofconceptrandomizedtrial
AT grahamandreak understandingselfmonitoringtoinformamobileinterventionforbingeeatingandweightmanagementaproofofconceptrandomizedtrial