Cargando…

Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

The sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is highly protocolized in other cancers, however, this is not the case for oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, hence our objective was to evaluate the different protocols published. A specific study protocol was designed and subsequently registered on PROSPERO (Ref....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suárez Ajuria, Maria, Gallas Torreira, Mercedes, García García, Abel, Marichalar Mendía, Xabier, Chamorro Petronacci, Cintia M., Padín Iruegas, Elena, Pérez Sayáns, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27042
_version_ 1784754428332474368
author Suárez Ajuria, Maria
Gallas Torreira, Mercedes
García García, Abel
Marichalar Mendía, Xabier
Chamorro Petronacci, Cintia M.
Padín Iruegas, Elena
Pérez Sayáns, Mario
author_facet Suárez Ajuria, Maria
Gallas Torreira, Mercedes
García García, Abel
Marichalar Mendía, Xabier
Chamorro Petronacci, Cintia M.
Padín Iruegas, Elena
Pérez Sayáns, Mario
author_sort Suárez Ajuria, Maria
collection PubMed
description The sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is highly protocolized in other cancers, however, this is not the case for oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, hence our objective was to evaluate the different protocols published. A specific study protocol was designed and subsequently registered on PROSPERO (Ref. CRD42021279217). Twenty‐three articles were included in the meta‐analysis. The grouped sensitivity of the SNB was 82% (95% CI: 0.74–0.88), and the grouped specificity was 100% (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). The use of other radiotracers other than pre‐operative lopamidol showed higher values of sensitivity of 82.80% (95% CI: 76.90%–87.50%; p < 0.001). The use of the blue dye stain showed higher sensitivity values of 85.60% (95% CI: 71.90%–93.20%), compared to sensitivity values of 77.50% when it was not used (95% CI: 69.10%–84.20%) (p < 0.001). Diagnostic rates are variable and they were significantly better when 99mTc was used in all its variations and accompanied by the blue dye staining.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9314893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93148932022-07-30 Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis Suárez Ajuria, Maria Gallas Torreira, Mercedes García García, Abel Marichalar Mendía, Xabier Chamorro Petronacci, Cintia M. Padín Iruegas, Elena Pérez Sayáns, Mario Head Neck Clinical Reviews The sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is highly protocolized in other cancers, however, this is not the case for oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, hence our objective was to evaluate the different protocols published. A specific study protocol was designed and subsequently registered on PROSPERO (Ref. CRD42021279217). Twenty‐three articles were included in the meta‐analysis. The grouped sensitivity of the SNB was 82% (95% CI: 0.74–0.88), and the grouped specificity was 100% (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). The use of other radiotracers other than pre‐operative lopamidol showed higher values of sensitivity of 82.80% (95% CI: 76.90%–87.50%; p < 0.001). The use of the blue dye stain showed higher sensitivity values of 85.60% (95% CI: 71.90%–93.20%), compared to sensitivity values of 77.50% when it was not used (95% CI: 69.10%–84.20%) (p < 0.001). Diagnostic rates are variable and they were significantly better when 99mTc was used in all its variations and accompanied by the blue dye staining. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-03-31 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9314893/ /pubmed/35362176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27042 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Clinical Reviews
Suárez Ajuria, Maria
Gallas Torreira, Mercedes
García García, Abel
Marichalar Mendía, Xabier
Chamorro Petronacci, Cintia M.
Padín Iruegas, Elena
Pérez Sayáns, Mario
Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Clinical Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27042
work_keys_str_mv AT suarezajuriamaria efficacyofdifferentsentinellymphnodebiopsyprotocolsinoralsquamouscellcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gallastorreiramercedes efficacyofdifferentsentinellymphnodebiopsyprotocolsinoralsquamouscellcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT garciagarciaabel efficacyofdifferentsentinellymphnodebiopsyprotocolsinoralsquamouscellcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marichalarmendiaxabier efficacyofdifferentsentinellymphnodebiopsyprotocolsinoralsquamouscellcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chamorropetronaccicintiam efficacyofdifferentsentinellymphnodebiopsyprotocolsinoralsquamouscellcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT padiniruegaselena efficacyofdifferentsentinellymphnodebiopsyprotocolsinoralsquamouscellcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT perezsayansmario efficacyofdifferentsentinellymphnodebiopsyprotocolsinoralsquamouscellcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis