Cargando…

Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series

OBJECTIVES: Buccal bone augmentation in the esthetic zone is routinely used to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, long‐term data are sparse, and it is unknown how baseline buccal bone volume affects the retention of the augmented volume over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a long‐te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feher, Balazs, Frommlet, Florian, Ulm, Christian, Gruber, Reinhard, Kuchler, Ulrike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13909
_version_ 1784754432282460160
author Feher, Balazs
Frommlet, Florian
Ulm, Christian
Gruber, Reinhard
Kuchler, Ulrike
author_facet Feher, Balazs
Frommlet, Florian
Ulm, Christian
Gruber, Reinhard
Kuchler, Ulrike
author_sort Feher, Balazs
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Buccal bone augmentation in the esthetic zone is routinely used to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, long‐term data are sparse, and it is unknown how baseline buccal bone volume affects the retention of the augmented volume over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a long‐term follow‐up retrospective case series. After a preoperative computed tomography scan, implants were placed in the anterior maxilla following guided bone regeneration, autogenous block grafting, or both. At the follow‐up, patients received a computed tomography scan and a clinical examination. Buccal bone volume was the primary outcome. Buccal bone thickness, peri‐implant, and esthetic parameters were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: After a median follow‐up of 6.7 years (interquartile range: 4.9–9.4), 28 implants in 19 patients (median age at augmentation: 43.3 years, interquartile range: 34.4–56.7, 53% female) were followed up. Preoperative buccal bone volume at baseline (V(0)) showed a moderate correlation to final buccal bone volume (V(t), r(s)  = .43) but a strong correlation to the absolute volumetric change (ΔV = V(t)–V(0), r(s)  = −.80). A linear mixed model for V(t) had a large intercept of 91.39 (p < .001) and a rather small slope of .11 for V(0) (p = .11). Observed differences between treatments were not statistically significant in the mixed model. V(0) above 105 mm(3) predicted a negative volume change (ΔV < 0) with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest higher gains in sites with lower V(0) and point to a cutoff V(0) above which the augmented volume is not retained long‐term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9314910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93149102022-07-30 Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series Feher, Balazs Frommlet, Florian Ulm, Christian Gruber, Reinhard Kuchler, Ulrike Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Buccal bone augmentation in the esthetic zone is routinely used to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, long‐term data are sparse, and it is unknown how baseline buccal bone volume affects the retention of the augmented volume over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a long‐term follow‐up retrospective case series. After a preoperative computed tomography scan, implants were placed in the anterior maxilla following guided bone regeneration, autogenous block grafting, or both. At the follow‐up, patients received a computed tomography scan and a clinical examination. Buccal bone volume was the primary outcome. Buccal bone thickness, peri‐implant, and esthetic parameters were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: After a median follow‐up of 6.7 years (interquartile range: 4.9–9.4), 28 implants in 19 patients (median age at augmentation: 43.3 years, interquartile range: 34.4–56.7, 53% female) were followed up. Preoperative buccal bone volume at baseline (V(0)) showed a moderate correlation to final buccal bone volume (V(t), r(s)  = .43) but a strong correlation to the absolute volumetric change (ΔV = V(t)–V(0), r(s)  = −.80). A linear mixed model for V(t) had a large intercept of 91.39 (p < .001) and a rather small slope of .11 for V(0) (p = .11). Observed differences between treatments were not statistically significant in the mixed model. V(0) above 105 mm(3) predicted a negative volume change (ΔV < 0) with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest higher gains in sites with lower V(0) and point to a cutoff V(0) above which the augmented volume is not retained long‐term. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-02 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9314910/ /pubmed/35194845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13909 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Feher, Balazs
Frommlet, Florian
Ulm, Christian
Gruber, Reinhard
Kuchler, Ulrike
Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series
title Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series
title_full Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series
title_fullStr Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series
title_short Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series
title_sort preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long‐term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: a retrospective case series
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13909
work_keys_str_mv AT feherbalazs preoperativebuccalbonevolumepredictslongtermgraftretentionfollowingaugmentationintheestheticzonearetrospectivecaseseries
AT frommletflorian preoperativebuccalbonevolumepredictslongtermgraftretentionfollowingaugmentationintheestheticzonearetrospectivecaseseries
AT ulmchristian preoperativebuccalbonevolumepredictslongtermgraftretentionfollowingaugmentationintheestheticzonearetrospectivecaseseries
AT gruberreinhard preoperativebuccalbonevolumepredictslongtermgraftretentionfollowingaugmentationintheestheticzonearetrospectivecaseseries
AT kuchlerulrike preoperativebuccalbonevolumepredictslongtermgraftretentionfollowingaugmentationintheestheticzonearetrospectivecaseseries