Cargando…

Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?

BACKGROUND: The recently described sensor‐crosstalk error in the multiple‐breath washout (MBW) device Exhalyzer D (Eco Medics AG) could highly influence clinimetric properties and the current interpretation of MBW results. This study reanalyzes MBW data from clinical routine in the corrected softwar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frauchiger, Bettina S., Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander, Wyler, Florian, Monney, Nathalie, Willers, Corin, Yammine, Sophie, Latzin, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25865
_version_ 1784754437811601408
author Frauchiger, Bettina S.
Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander
Wyler, Florian
Monney, Nathalie
Willers, Corin
Yammine, Sophie
Latzin, Philipp
author_facet Frauchiger, Bettina S.
Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander
Wyler, Florian
Monney, Nathalie
Willers, Corin
Yammine, Sophie
Latzin, Philipp
author_sort Frauchiger, Bettina S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recently described sensor‐crosstalk error in the multiple‐breath washout (MBW) device Exhalyzer D (Eco Medics AG) could highly influence clinimetric properties and the current interpretation of MBW results. This study reanalyzes MBW data from clinical routine in the corrected software version Spiroware® 3.3.1 and evaluates the effect on outcomes. METHODS: We included nitrogen‐MBW data from healthy children and children with cystic fibrosis (CF) from previously published trials and ongoing cohort studies. We specifically compared lung clearance index (LCI) analyzed in Spiroware 3.2.1 and 3.3.1 with regard to (i) feasibility, (ii) repeatability, and (iii) validity as outcome parameters in children with CF. RESULTS: (i) All previously collected measurements could be reanalyzed and resulted in unchanged feasibility in Spiroware 3.3.1. (ii) Short‐ and midterm repeatability of LCI was similar in both software versions. (iii) Clinical validity of LCI remained similar in Spiroware 3.3.1; however, this resulted in lower values. Discrimination between health and disease was comparable between both software versions. The increase in LCI over time was less pronounced with 0.16 LCI units/year (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08; 0.24) versus 0.30 LCI units/year (95% CI 0.21; 0.38) in 3.2.1. Response to intervention in children receiving CF transmembrane conductance‐modulator therapy resulted in a comparable improvement in LCI, in both Spiroware versions. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that clinimetric properties of LCI remain unaffected after correction for the cross‐sensitivity error in Spiroware software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9314934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93149342022-07-30 Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? Frauchiger, Bettina S. Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander Wyler, Florian Monney, Nathalie Willers, Corin Yammine, Sophie Latzin, Philipp Pediatr Pulmonol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The recently described sensor‐crosstalk error in the multiple‐breath washout (MBW) device Exhalyzer D (Eco Medics AG) could highly influence clinimetric properties and the current interpretation of MBW results. This study reanalyzes MBW data from clinical routine in the corrected software version Spiroware® 3.3.1 and evaluates the effect on outcomes. METHODS: We included nitrogen‐MBW data from healthy children and children with cystic fibrosis (CF) from previously published trials and ongoing cohort studies. We specifically compared lung clearance index (LCI) analyzed in Spiroware 3.2.1 and 3.3.1 with regard to (i) feasibility, (ii) repeatability, and (iii) validity as outcome parameters in children with CF. RESULTS: (i) All previously collected measurements could be reanalyzed and resulted in unchanged feasibility in Spiroware 3.3.1. (ii) Short‐ and midterm repeatability of LCI was similar in both software versions. (iii) Clinical validity of LCI remained similar in Spiroware 3.3.1; however, this resulted in lower values. Discrimination between health and disease was comparable between both software versions. The increase in LCI over time was less pronounced with 0.16 LCI units/year (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08; 0.24) versus 0.30 LCI units/year (95% CI 0.21; 0.38) in 3.2.1. Response to intervention in children receiving CF transmembrane conductance‐modulator therapy resulted in a comparable improvement in LCI, in both Spiroware versions. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that clinimetric properties of LCI remain unaffected after correction for the cross‐sensitivity error in Spiroware software. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-09 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9314934/ /pubmed/35182057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25865 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Pulmonology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Frauchiger, Bettina S.
Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander
Wyler, Florian
Monney, Nathalie
Willers, Corin
Yammine, Sophie
Latzin, Philipp
Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?
title Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?
title_full Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?
title_fullStr Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?
title_full_unstemmed Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?
title_short Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?
title_sort do clinimetric properties of lci change after correction of signal processing?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25865
work_keys_str_mv AT frauchigerbettinas doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing
AT oestreichmarcalexander doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing
AT wylerflorian doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing
AT monneynathalie doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing
AT willerscorin doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing
AT yamminesophie doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing
AT latzinphilipp doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing