Cargando…
Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing?
BACKGROUND: The recently described sensor‐crosstalk error in the multiple‐breath washout (MBW) device Exhalyzer D (Eco Medics AG) could highly influence clinimetric properties and the current interpretation of MBW results. This study reanalyzes MBW data from clinical routine in the corrected softwar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25865 |
_version_ | 1784754437811601408 |
---|---|
author | Frauchiger, Bettina S. Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander Wyler, Florian Monney, Nathalie Willers, Corin Yammine, Sophie Latzin, Philipp |
author_facet | Frauchiger, Bettina S. Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander Wyler, Florian Monney, Nathalie Willers, Corin Yammine, Sophie Latzin, Philipp |
author_sort | Frauchiger, Bettina S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The recently described sensor‐crosstalk error in the multiple‐breath washout (MBW) device Exhalyzer D (Eco Medics AG) could highly influence clinimetric properties and the current interpretation of MBW results. This study reanalyzes MBW data from clinical routine in the corrected software version Spiroware® 3.3.1 and evaluates the effect on outcomes. METHODS: We included nitrogen‐MBW data from healthy children and children with cystic fibrosis (CF) from previously published trials and ongoing cohort studies. We specifically compared lung clearance index (LCI) analyzed in Spiroware 3.2.1 and 3.3.1 with regard to (i) feasibility, (ii) repeatability, and (iii) validity as outcome parameters in children with CF. RESULTS: (i) All previously collected measurements could be reanalyzed and resulted in unchanged feasibility in Spiroware 3.3.1. (ii) Short‐ and midterm repeatability of LCI was similar in both software versions. (iii) Clinical validity of LCI remained similar in Spiroware 3.3.1; however, this resulted in lower values. Discrimination between health and disease was comparable between both software versions. The increase in LCI over time was less pronounced with 0.16 LCI units/year (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08; 0.24) versus 0.30 LCI units/year (95% CI 0.21; 0.38) in 3.2.1. Response to intervention in children receiving CF transmembrane conductance‐modulator therapy resulted in a comparable improvement in LCI, in both Spiroware versions. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that clinimetric properties of LCI remain unaffected after correction for the cross‐sensitivity error in Spiroware software. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9314934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93149342022-07-30 Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? Frauchiger, Bettina S. Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander Wyler, Florian Monney, Nathalie Willers, Corin Yammine, Sophie Latzin, Philipp Pediatr Pulmonol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The recently described sensor‐crosstalk error in the multiple‐breath washout (MBW) device Exhalyzer D (Eco Medics AG) could highly influence clinimetric properties and the current interpretation of MBW results. This study reanalyzes MBW data from clinical routine in the corrected software version Spiroware® 3.3.1 and evaluates the effect on outcomes. METHODS: We included nitrogen‐MBW data from healthy children and children with cystic fibrosis (CF) from previously published trials and ongoing cohort studies. We specifically compared lung clearance index (LCI) analyzed in Spiroware 3.2.1 and 3.3.1 with regard to (i) feasibility, (ii) repeatability, and (iii) validity as outcome parameters in children with CF. RESULTS: (i) All previously collected measurements could be reanalyzed and resulted in unchanged feasibility in Spiroware 3.3.1. (ii) Short‐ and midterm repeatability of LCI was similar in both software versions. (iii) Clinical validity of LCI remained similar in Spiroware 3.3.1; however, this resulted in lower values. Discrimination between health and disease was comparable between both software versions. The increase in LCI over time was less pronounced with 0.16 LCI units/year (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08; 0.24) versus 0.30 LCI units/year (95% CI 0.21; 0.38) in 3.2.1. Response to intervention in children receiving CF transmembrane conductance‐modulator therapy resulted in a comparable improvement in LCI, in both Spiroware versions. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that clinimetric properties of LCI remain unaffected after correction for the cross‐sensitivity error in Spiroware software. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-09 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9314934/ /pubmed/35182057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25865 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Pulmonology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Frauchiger, Bettina S. Oestreich, Marc‐Alexander Wyler, Florian Monney, Nathalie Willers, Corin Yammine, Sophie Latzin, Philipp Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? |
title | Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? |
title_full | Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? |
title_fullStr | Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? |
title_short | Do clinimetric properties of LCI change after correction of signal processing? |
title_sort | do clinimetric properties of lci change after correction of signal processing? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.25865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frauchigerbettinas doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing AT oestreichmarcalexander doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing AT wylerflorian doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing AT monneynathalie doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing AT willerscorin doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing AT yamminesophie doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing AT latzinphilipp doclinimetricpropertiesoflcichangeaftercorrectionofsignalprocessing |