Cargando…
Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R (1) mapping at 7T
PURPOSE: Inter‐scan motion is a substantial source of error in [Formula: see text] estimation methods based on multiple volumes, for example, variable flip angle (VFA), and can be expected to increase at 7T where [Formula: see text] fields are more inhomogeneous. The established correction scheme do...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29216 |
_version_ | 1784754445021609984 |
---|---|
author | Balbastre, Yaël Aghaeifar, Ali Corbin, Nadège Brudfors, Mikael Ashburner, John Callaghan, Martina F. |
author_facet | Balbastre, Yaël Aghaeifar, Ali Corbin, Nadège Brudfors, Mikael Ashburner, John Callaghan, Martina F. |
author_sort | Balbastre, Yaël |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Inter‐scan motion is a substantial source of error in [Formula: see text] estimation methods based on multiple volumes, for example, variable flip angle (VFA), and can be expected to increase at 7T where [Formula: see text] fields are more inhomogeneous. The established correction scheme does not translate to 7T since it requires a body coil reference. Here we introduce two alternatives that outperform the established method. Since they compute relative sensitivities they do not require body coil images. THEORY: The proposed methods use coil‐combined magnitude images to obtain the relative coil sensitivities. The first method efficiently computes the relative sensitivities via a simple ratio; the second by fitting a more sophisticated generative model. METHODS: [Formula: see text] maps were computed using the VFA approach. Multiple datasets were acquired at 3T and 7T, with and without motion between the acquisition of the VFA volumes. [Formula: see text] maps were constructed without correction, with the proposed corrections, and (at 3T) with the previously established correction scheme. The effect of the greater inhomogeneity in the transmit field at 7T was also explored by acquiring [Formula: see text] maps at each position. RESULTS: At 3T, the proposed methods outperform the baseline method. Inter‐scan motion artifacts were also reduced at 7T. However, at 7T reproducibility only converged on that of the no motion condition if position‐specific transmit field effects were also incorporated. CONCLUSION: The proposed methods simplify inter‐scan motion correction of [Formula: see text] maps and are applicable at both 3T and 7T, where a body coil is typically not available. The open‐source code for all methods is made publicly available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9314963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93149632022-07-30 Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R (1) mapping at 7T Balbastre, Yaël Aghaeifar, Ali Corbin, Nadège Brudfors, Mikael Ashburner, John Callaghan, Martina F. Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Inter‐scan motion is a substantial source of error in [Formula: see text] estimation methods based on multiple volumes, for example, variable flip angle (VFA), and can be expected to increase at 7T where [Formula: see text] fields are more inhomogeneous. The established correction scheme does not translate to 7T since it requires a body coil reference. Here we introduce two alternatives that outperform the established method. Since they compute relative sensitivities they do not require body coil images. THEORY: The proposed methods use coil‐combined magnitude images to obtain the relative coil sensitivities. The first method efficiently computes the relative sensitivities via a simple ratio; the second by fitting a more sophisticated generative model. METHODS: [Formula: see text] maps were computed using the VFA approach. Multiple datasets were acquired at 3T and 7T, with and without motion between the acquisition of the VFA volumes. [Formula: see text] maps were constructed without correction, with the proposed corrections, and (at 3T) with the previously established correction scheme. The effect of the greater inhomogeneity in the transmit field at 7T was also explored by acquiring [Formula: see text] maps at each position. RESULTS: At 3T, the proposed methods outperform the baseline method. Inter‐scan motion artifacts were also reduced at 7T. However, at 7T reproducibility only converged on that of the no motion condition if position‐specific transmit field effects were also incorporated. CONCLUSION: The proposed methods simplify inter‐scan motion correction of [Formula: see text] maps and are applicable at both 3T and 7T, where a body coil is typically not available. The open‐source code for all methods is made publicly available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-21 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9314963/ /pubmed/35313378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29216 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles—Imaging Methodology Balbastre, Yaël Aghaeifar, Ali Corbin, Nadège Brudfors, Mikael Ashburner, John Callaghan, Martina F. Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R (1) mapping at 7T |
title | Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R
(1) mapping at 7T |
title_full | Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R
(1) mapping at 7T |
title_fullStr | Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R
(1) mapping at 7T |
title_full_unstemmed | Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R
(1) mapping at 7T |
title_short | Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R
(1) mapping at 7T |
title_sort | correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative r
(1) mapping at 7t |
topic | Research Articles—Imaging Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balbastreyael correctinginterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingat7t AT aghaeifarali correctinginterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingat7t AT corbinnadege correctinginterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingat7t AT brudforsmikael correctinginterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingat7t AT ashburnerjohn correctinginterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingat7t AT callaghanmartinaf correctinginterscanmotionartifactsinquantitativer1mappingat7t |