Cargando…
The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems
AIMS: This study explored how dairy farm operating systems with free‐stall or tie‐stall housing and cow hygiene score influence the occurrence of zoonotic bacteria in raw milk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Samples from bulk tank milk (BTM), milk filters, faeces, feed, teats and teat milk were collected from...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15512 |
_version_ | 1784754456515051520 |
---|---|
author | Idland, Lene Granquist, Erik G. Aspholm, Marina Lindbäck, Toril |
author_facet | Idland, Lene Granquist, Erik G. Aspholm, Marina Lindbäck, Toril |
author_sort | Idland, Lene |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This study explored how dairy farm operating systems with free‐stall or tie‐stall housing and cow hygiene score influence the occurrence of zoonotic bacteria in raw milk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Samples from bulk tank milk (BTM), milk filters, faeces, feed, teats and teat milk were collected from 11 farms with loose housing and seven farms with tie‐stall housing every second month over a period of 11 months and analysed for the presence of STEC by culturing combined with polymerase chain reaction and for Campylobacter spp. and L. monocytogenes by culturing only. Campylobacter spp., L. monocytogenes and STEC were present in samples from the farm environment and were also detected in 4%, 13% and 7% of the milk filters, respectively, and in 3%, 0% and 1% of BTM samples. Four STEC isolates carried the eae gene, which is linked to the capacity to cause severe human disease. L. monocytogenes were detected more frequently in loose housing herds compared with tie‐stalled herds in faeces (p = 0.02) and feed (p = 0.03), and Campylobacter spp. were detected more frequently in loose housing herds in faeces (p < 0.01) and teat swabs (p = 0.03). An association between cow hygiene score and detection of Campylobacter spp. in teat milk was observed (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Since some samples collected from loose housing systems revealed a significantly higher (p < 0.05) content of L. monocytogenes and Campylobacter spp. than samples collected from tie‐stalled herds, the current study suggests that the type of housing system may influence the food safety of raw milk. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study highlights that zoonotic bacteria can be present in raw milk independent of hygienic conditions at the farm and what housing system is used. Altogether, this study provides important knowledge for evaluating the risk of drinking unpasteurized milk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9315008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93150082022-07-30 The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems Idland, Lene Granquist, Erik G. Aspholm, Marina Lindbäck, Toril J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIMS: This study explored how dairy farm operating systems with free‐stall or tie‐stall housing and cow hygiene score influence the occurrence of zoonotic bacteria in raw milk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Samples from bulk tank milk (BTM), milk filters, faeces, feed, teats and teat milk were collected from 11 farms with loose housing and seven farms with tie‐stall housing every second month over a period of 11 months and analysed for the presence of STEC by culturing combined with polymerase chain reaction and for Campylobacter spp. and L. monocytogenes by culturing only. Campylobacter spp., L. monocytogenes and STEC were present in samples from the farm environment and were also detected in 4%, 13% and 7% of the milk filters, respectively, and in 3%, 0% and 1% of BTM samples. Four STEC isolates carried the eae gene, which is linked to the capacity to cause severe human disease. L. monocytogenes were detected more frequently in loose housing herds compared with tie‐stalled herds in faeces (p = 0.02) and feed (p = 0.03), and Campylobacter spp. were detected more frequently in loose housing herds in faeces (p < 0.01) and teat swabs (p = 0.03). An association between cow hygiene score and detection of Campylobacter spp. in teat milk was observed (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Since some samples collected from loose housing systems revealed a significantly higher (p < 0.05) content of L. monocytogenes and Campylobacter spp. than samples collected from tie‐stalled herds, the current study suggests that the type of housing system may influence the food safety of raw milk. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study highlights that zoonotic bacteria can be present in raw milk independent of hygienic conditions at the farm and what housing system is used. Altogether, this study provides important knowledge for evaluating the risk of drinking unpasteurized milk. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-11 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9315008/ /pubmed/35244319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15512 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Idland, Lene Granquist, Erik G. Aspholm, Marina Lindbäck, Toril The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems |
title | The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems |
title_full | The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems |
title_short | The prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Shiga toxin‐producing Escherichia coli in Norwegian dairy cattle farms: A comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems |
title_sort | prevalence of campylobacter spp., listeria monocytogenes and shiga toxin‐producing escherichia coli in norwegian dairy cattle farms: a comparison between free stall and tie stall housing systems |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT idlandlene theprevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems AT granquisterikg theprevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems AT aspholmmarina theprevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems AT lindbacktoril theprevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems AT idlandlene prevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems AT granquisterikg prevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems AT aspholmmarina prevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems AT lindbacktoril prevalenceofcampylobacterspplisteriamonocytogenesandshigatoxinproducingescherichiacoliinnorwegiandairycattlefarmsacomparisonbetweenfreestallandtiestallhousingsystems |