Cargando…

Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the value of different radiomic models based on multiphase computed tomography in differentiating parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and basal cell tumor (BCA) concerning the predominant phase and the optimal radiomic model. METHODS: This study enrolled 173 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yun-lin, Zheng, Yi-neng, Li, Chuan-fei, Gao, Jue-ni, Zhang, Xin-yu, Li, Xin-yi, Zhou, Di, Wen, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903689
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.889833
_version_ 1784754492480159744
author Zheng, Yun-lin
Zheng, Yi-neng
Li, Chuan-fei
Gao, Jue-ni
Zhang, Xin-yu
Li, Xin-yi
Zhou, Di
Wen, Ming
author_facet Zheng, Yun-lin
Zheng, Yi-neng
Li, Chuan-fei
Gao, Jue-ni
Zhang, Xin-yu
Li, Xin-yi
Zhou, Di
Wen, Ming
author_sort Zheng, Yun-lin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study explored the value of different radiomic models based on multiphase computed tomography in differentiating parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and basal cell tumor (BCA) concerning the predominant phase and the optimal radiomic model. METHODS: This study enrolled 173 patients with pathologically confirmed parotid tumors (training cohort: n=121; testing cohort: n=52). Radiomic features were extracted from the nonenhanced, arterial, venous, and delayed phases CT images. After dimensionality reduction and screening, logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM) were applied to develop radiomic models. The optimal radiomic model was selected by using ROC curve analysis. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze clinical-radiological characteristics and to identify variables for developing a clinical model. A combined model was constructed by integrating clinical and radiomic features. Model performances were assessed by ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1036 radiomic features were extracted from each phase of CT images. Sixteen radiomic features were considered valuable by dimensionality reduction and screening. Among radiomic models, the SVM model of the arterial and delayed phases showed superior predictive efficiency and robustness (AUC, training cohort: 0.822, 0.838; testing cohort: 0.752, 0.751). The discriminatory capability of the combined model was the best (AUC, training cohort: 0.885; testing cohort: 0.834). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of the arterial and delayed phases contributed more than other phases. However, the combined model demonstrated excellent ability to distinguish BCA from PA, which may provide a non-invasive and efficient method for clinical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9315155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93151552022-07-27 Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma Zheng, Yun-lin Zheng, Yi-neng Li, Chuan-fei Gao, Jue-ni Zhang, Xin-yu Li, Xin-yi Zhou, Di Wen, Ming Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study explored the value of different radiomic models based on multiphase computed tomography in differentiating parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and basal cell tumor (BCA) concerning the predominant phase and the optimal radiomic model. METHODS: This study enrolled 173 patients with pathologically confirmed parotid tumors (training cohort: n=121; testing cohort: n=52). Radiomic features were extracted from the nonenhanced, arterial, venous, and delayed phases CT images. After dimensionality reduction and screening, logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM) were applied to develop radiomic models. The optimal radiomic model was selected by using ROC curve analysis. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze clinical-radiological characteristics and to identify variables for developing a clinical model. A combined model was constructed by integrating clinical and radiomic features. Model performances were assessed by ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1036 radiomic features were extracted from each phase of CT images. Sixteen radiomic features were considered valuable by dimensionality reduction and screening. Among radiomic models, the SVM model of the arterial and delayed phases showed superior predictive efficiency and robustness (AUC, training cohort: 0.822, 0.838; testing cohort: 0.752, 0.751). The discriminatory capability of the combined model was the best (AUC, training cohort: 0.885; testing cohort: 0.834). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of the arterial and delayed phases contributed more than other phases. However, the combined model demonstrated excellent ability to distinguish BCA from PA, which may provide a non-invasive and efficient method for clinical decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9315155/ /pubmed/35903689 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.889833 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zheng, Zheng, Li, Gao, Zhang, Li, Zhou and Wen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zheng, Yun-lin
Zheng, Yi-neng
Li, Chuan-fei
Gao, Jue-ni
Zhang, Xin-yu
Li, Xin-yi
Zhou, Di
Wen, Ming
Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma
title Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma
title_full Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma
title_short Comparison of Different Machine Models Based on Multi-Phase Computed Tomography Radiomic Analysis to Differentiate Parotid Basal Cell Adenoma From Pleomorphic Adenoma
title_sort comparison of different machine models based on multi-phase computed tomography radiomic analysis to differentiate parotid basal cell adenoma from pleomorphic adenoma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903689
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.889833
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyunlin comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma
AT zhengyineng comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma
AT lichuanfei comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma
AT gaojueni comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma
AT zhangxinyu comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma
AT lixinyi comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma
AT zhoudi comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma
AT wenming comparisonofdifferentmachinemodelsbasedonmultiphasecomputedtomographyradiomicanalysistodifferentiateparotidbasalcelladenomafrompleomorphicadenoma