Cargando…

Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study

OBJECTIVE: Autologous transplantation of epidermal cells has been used increasingly to treat vitiligo patients and is a simple, safe, and relatively efficient method. However, the outcome is not always satisfactory, and some patients show less or no response to this treatment. This study was evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdolahzadeh, Hadis, Mohammadi, Parvaneh, Ghasemi, Mahshid, Mousavi, Seyed Ahmad, Bajouri, Amir, Ataei-Fashtami, Leila, Totonchi, Mehdi, Rezvani, Mohammad, Aghdami, Nasser, Shafieyan, Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royan Institute 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892236
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2022.7893
_version_ 1784754508155322368
author Abdolahzadeh, Hadis
Mohammadi, Parvaneh
Ghasemi, Mahshid
Mousavi, Seyed Ahmad
Bajouri, Amir
Ataei-Fashtami, Leila
Totonchi, Mehdi
Rezvani, Mohammad
Aghdami, Nasser
Shafieyan, Saeed
author_facet Abdolahzadeh, Hadis
Mohammadi, Parvaneh
Ghasemi, Mahshid
Mousavi, Seyed Ahmad
Bajouri, Amir
Ataei-Fashtami, Leila
Totonchi, Mehdi
Rezvani, Mohammad
Aghdami, Nasser
Shafieyan, Saeed
author_sort Abdolahzadeh, Hadis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Autologous transplantation of epidermal cells has been used increasingly to treat vitiligo patients and is a simple, safe, and relatively efficient method. However, the outcome is not always satisfactory, and some patients show less or no response to this treatment. This study was evaluated to identify genes expressed differently among responders and non-responders to cell transplantation to find potential markers that could predict 'patients' responses to this type of cell therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven stable vitiligo patients who received autologous epidermal cell transplantation were included in this clinical trial study. Before cell transplantation, skin samples were obtained from the recipient’s vitiligo lesions. After epidermal cell transplantation, patients were followed for at least six months to assess the response to epidermal cell injection. RNA sequencing was used to determine potential gene expression profile differences between responder and non-responder vitiligo patients. RESULTS: The RNA sequencing results showed differences in expression levels of 470 genes between the skin specimens of responder versus non-responder patients. There were 269 up-regulated genes and 201 down-regulated genes. Upregulated genes were involved in processes, such as Fatty Acid Omega Oxidation. Down-regulated genes were related to PPAR signaling pathway, and estrogen signaling pathway. Among the most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with the most altered RNA expression levels in responders versus non-responder patients, we selected three genes (up-regulated genes KRTAP10-11 and down-regulated genes IP6K2 and C9) as potential biomarkers, which are involved in associated pathways. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, it is estimated that proposed genes might predict the response of vitiligo patients to cell therapy. However, furtherstudies are required to clarify the role of these genes in pathogenesis and to characterize gene expression in a larger number of vitiligo patients in the context of epidermal cell transplantation therapy (registration number: IRCT201508201031N16).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9315216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Royan Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93152162022-07-28 Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study Abdolahzadeh, Hadis Mohammadi, Parvaneh Ghasemi, Mahshid Mousavi, Seyed Ahmad Bajouri, Amir Ataei-Fashtami, Leila Totonchi, Mehdi Rezvani, Mohammad Aghdami, Nasser Shafieyan, Saeed Cell J Original Article OBJECTIVE: Autologous transplantation of epidermal cells has been used increasingly to treat vitiligo patients and is a simple, safe, and relatively efficient method. However, the outcome is not always satisfactory, and some patients show less or no response to this treatment. This study was evaluated to identify genes expressed differently among responders and non-responders to cell transplantation to find potential markers that could predict 'patients' responses to this type of cell therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven stable vitiligo patients who received autologous epidermal cell transplantation were included in this clinical trial study. Before cell transplantation, skin samples were obtained from the recipient’s vitiligo lesions. After epidermal cell transplantation, patients were followed for at least six months to assess the response to epidermal cell injection. RNA sequencing was used to determine potential gene expression profile differences between responder and non-responder vitiligo patients. RESULTS: The RNA sequencing results showed differences in expression levels of 470 genes between the skin specimens of responder versus non-responder patients. There were 269 up-regulated genes and 201 down-regulated genes. Upregulated genes were involved in processes, such as Fatty Acid Omega Oxidation. Down-regulated genes were related to PPAR signaling pathway, and estrogen signaling pathway. Among the most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with the most altered RNA expression levels in responders versus non-responder patients, we selected three genes (up-regulated genes KRTAP10-11 and down-regulated genes IP6K2 and C9) as potential biomarkers, which are involved in associated pathways. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, it is estimated that proposed genes might predict the response of vitiligo patients to cell therapy. However, furtherstudies are required to clarify the role of these genes in pathogenesis and to characterize gene expression in a larger number of vitiligo patients in the context of epidermal cell transplantation therapy (registration number: IRCT201508201031N16). Royan Institute 2022-06 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9315216/ /pubmed/35892236 http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2022.7893 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0) License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdolahzadeh, Hadis
Mohammadi, Parvaneh
Ghasemi, Mahshid
Mousavi, Seyed Ahmad
Bajouri, Amir
Ataei-Fashtami, Leila
Totonchi, Mehdi
Rezvani, Mohammad
Aghdami, Nasser
Shafieyan, Saeed
Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study
title Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study
title_full Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study
title_short Comparison of Skin Transcriptome between Responder and Non-Responder Vitiligo Lesions to Cell Transplantation: A Clinical Trial Study
title_sort comparison of skin transcriptome between responder and non-responder vitiligo lesions to cell transplantation: a clinical trial study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892236
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2022.7893
work_keys_str_mv AT abdolahzadehhadis comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT mohammadiparvaneh comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT ghasemimahshid comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT mousaviseyedahmad comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT bajouriamir comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT ataeifashtamileila comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT totonchimehdi comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT rezvanimohammad comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT aghdaminasser comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy
AT shafieyansaeed comparisonofskintranscriptomebetweenresponderandnonrespondervitiligolesionstocelltransplantationaclinicaltrialstudy