Cargando…

Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

Understanding the risk of infection by routine medical examination is important for the protection of the medical personnel. In this study we investigated respiratory particles emitted by patients during routine otolaryngologic procedures and assessed the risks for the performing physician. We devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veltrup, Reinhard, Kniesburges, Stefan, Döllinger, Michael, Falk, Sebastian, Mueller, Sarina K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885507
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071603
_version_ 1784754569318760448
author Veltrup, Reinhard
Kniesburges, Stefan
Döllinger, Michael
Falk, Sebastian
Mueller, Sarina K.
author_facet Veltrup, Reinhard
Kniesburges, Stefan
Döllinger, Michael
Falk, Sebastian
Mueller, Sarina K.
author_sort Veltrup, Reinhard
collection PubMed
description Understanding the risk of infection by routine medical examination is important for the protection of the medical personnel. In this study we investigated respiratory particles emitted by patients during routine otolaryngologic procedures and assessed the risks for the performing physician. We developed two experimental setups to measure aerosol and droplet emission during rigid/flexible laryngoscopy, rhinoscopy, pharyngoscopy, otoscopy, sonography and patient interview for subjects with and without masks. A high-speed-camera setup was used to detect ballistic droplets (approx. > 100 µm) and an aerosol-particle-sizer was used to detect aerosol particles in the range of 0.3 µm to 10 µm. Aerosol particle counts were highly increased for coughing and slightly increased for heavy breathing in subjects without masks. The highest aerosol particle counts occurred during rigid laryngoscopy. During laryngoscopy and rhinoscopy, the examiner was exposed to increased particle emission due to close proximity to the patient’s face and provoked events such as coughing. However, even during sonography or otoscopy without a mask, aerosol particles were expelled close to the examiner. The physician’s exposure to respiratory particles can be reduced by deliberate choice of examination technique depending on medical indication and the use of appropriate equipment for the examiners and the patients (e.g., FFP2 masks for both).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9315468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93154682022-07-27 Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Veltrup, Reinhard Kniesburges, Stefan Döllinger, Michael Falk, Sebastian Mueller, Sarina K. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Understanding the risk of infection by routine medical examination is important for the protection of the medical personnel. In this study we investigated respiratory particles emitted by patients during routine otolaryngologic procedures and assessed the risks for the performing physician. We developed two experimental setups to measure aerosol and droplet emission during rigid/flexible laryngoscopy, rhinoscopy, pharyngoscopy, otoscopy, sonography and patient interview for subjects with and without masks. A high-speed-camera setup was used to detect ballistic droplets (approx. > 100 µm) and an aerosol-particle-sizer was used to detect aerosol particles in the range of 0.3 µm to 10 µm. Aerosol particle counts were highly increased for coughing and slightly increased for heavy breathing in subjects without masks. The highest aerosol particle counts occurred during rigid laryngoscopy. During laryngoscopy and rhinoscopy, the examiner was exposed to increased particle emission due to close proximity to the patient’s face and provoked events such as coughing. However, even during sonography or otoscopy without a mask, aerosol particles were expelled close to the examiner. The physician’s exposure to respiratory particles can be reduced by deliberate choice of examination technique depending on medical indication and the use of appropriate equipment for the examiners and the patients (e.g., FFP2 masks for both). MDPI 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9315468/ /pubmed/35885507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071603 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Veltrup, Reinhard
Kniesburges, Stefan
Döllinger, Michael
Falk, Sebastian
Mueller, Sarina K.
Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
title Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
title_full Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
title_fullStr Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
title_short Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Emission during Otorhinolaryngological Procedures in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
title_sort evaluation of respiratory particle emission during otorhinolaryngological procedures in the context of the sars-cov-2 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35885507
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071603
work_keys_str_mv AT veltrupreinhard evaluationofrespiratoryparticleemissionduringotorhinolaryngologicalproceduresinthecontextofthesarscov2pandemic
AT kniesburgesstefan evaluationofrespiratoryparticleemissionduringotorhinolaryngologicalproceduresinthecontextofthesarscov2pandemic
AT dollingermichael evaluationofrespiratoryparticleemissionduringotorhinolaryngologicalproceduresinthecontextofthesarscov2pandemic
AT falksebastian evaluationofrespiratoryparticleemissionduringotorhinolaryngologicalproceduresinthecontextofthesarscov2pandemic
AT muellersarinak evaluationofrespiratoryparticleemissionduringotorhinolaryngologicalproceduresinthecontextofthesarscov2pandemic