Cargando…

The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study

Background Research identifying and returning clinically actionable germline variants offer a new avenue of access to genetic information. The psychosocial and clinical outcomes for women who have received this ‘genome-first care’ delivering hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk information outs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forrest, Laura E., Forbes Shepherd, Rowan, Tutty, Erin, Pearce, Angela, Campbell, Ian, Devereux, Lisa, Trainer, Alison H., James, Paul A., Young, Mary-Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071112
_version_ 1784754639834447872
author Forrest, Laura E.
Forbes Shepherd, Rowan
Tutty, Erin
Pearce, Angela
Campbell, Ian
Devereux, Lisa
Trainer, Alison H.
James, Paul A.
Young, Mary-Anne
author_facet Forrest, Laura E.
Forbes Shepherd, Rowan
Tutty, Erin
Pearce, Angela
Campbell, Ian
Devereux, Lisa
Trainer, Alison H.
James, Paul A.
Young, Mary-Anne
author_sort Forrest, Laura E.
collection PubMed
description Background Research identifying and returning clinically actionable germline variants offer a new avenue of access to genetic information. The psychosocial and clinical outcomes for women who have received this ‘genome-first care’ delivering hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk information outside of clinical genetics services are unknown. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods case-control study compared outcomes between women who did (cases; group 1) and did not (controls; group 2) receive clinically actionable genetic information from a research cohort in Victoria, Australia. Participants completed an online survey examining cancer risk perception and worry, and group 1 also completed distress and adaptation measures. Group 1 participants subsequently completed a semi structured interview. Results: Forty-five participants (group 1) and 96 (group 2) completed the online survey, and 31 group 1 participants were interviewed. There were no demographic differences between groups 1 and 2, although more of group 1 participants had children (p = 0.03). Group 1 reported significantly higher breast cancer risk perception (p < 0.001) compared to group 2, and higher cancer worry than group 2 (p < 0.001). Some group 1 participants described how receiving their genetic information heightened their cancer risk perception and exacerbated their cancer worry while waiting for risk-reducing surgery. Group 1 participants reported a MICRA mean score of 27.4 (SD 11.8, range 9–56; possible range 0–95), and an adaptation score of 2.9 (SD = 1.1). Conclusion: There were no adverse psychological outcomes amongst women who received clinically actionable germline information through a model of ‘genome-first’ care compared to those who did not. These findings support the return of clinically actionable research results to research participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9315752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93157522022-07-27 The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study Forrest, Laura E. Forbes Shepherd, Rowan Tutty, Erin Pearce, Angela Campbell, Ian Devereux, Lisa Trainer, Alison H. James, Paul A. Young, Mary-Anne J Pers Med Article Background Research identifying and returning clinically actionable germline variants offer a new avenue of access to genetic information. The psychosocial and clinical outcomes for women who have received this ‘genome-first care’ delivering hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk information outside of clinical genetics services are unknown. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods case-control study compared outcomes between women who did (cases; group 1) and did not (controls; group 2) receive clinically actionable genetic information from a research cohort in Victoria, Australia. Participants completed an online survey examining cancer risk perception and worry, and group 1 also completed distress and adaptation measures. Group 1 participants subsequently completed a semi structured interview. Results: Forty-five participants (group 1) and 96 (group 2) completed the online survey, and 31 group 1 participants were interviewed. There were no demographic differences between groups 1 and 2, although more of group 1 participants had children (p = 0.03). Group 1 reported significantly higher breast cancer risk perception (p < 0.001) compared to group 2, and higher cancer worry than group 2 (p < 0.001). Some group 1 participants described how receiving their genetic information heightened their cancer risk perception and exacerbated their cancer worry while waiting for risk-reducing surgery. Group 1 participants reported a MICRA mean score of 27.4 (SD 11.8, range 9–56; possible range 0–95), and an adaptation score of 2.9 (SD = 1.1). Conclusion: There were no adverse psychological outcomes amongst women who received clinically actionable germline information through a model of ‘genome-first’ care compared to those who did not. These findings support the return of clinically actionable research results to research participants. MDPI 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9315752/ /pubmed/35887609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071112 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Forrest, Laura E.
Forbes Shepherd, Rowan
Tutty, Erin
Pearce, Angela
Campbell, Ian
Devereux, Lisa
Trainer, Alison H.
James, Paul A.
Young, Mary-Anne
The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_full The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_fullStr The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_short The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_sort clinical and psychosocial outcomes for women who received unexpected clinically actionable germline information identified through research: an exploratory sequential mixed-methods comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35887609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071112
work_keys_str_mv AT forrestlaurae theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT forbesshepherdrowan theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT tuttyerin theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT pearceangela theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT campbellian theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT devereuxlisa theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT traineralisonh theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT jamespaula theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT youngmaryanne theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT forrestlaurae clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT forbesshepherdrowan clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT tuttyerin clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT pearceangela clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT campbellian clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT devereuxlisa clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT traineralisonh clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT jamespaula clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT youngmaryanne clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy