Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS)

Patient health literacy is vital to clinical trial engagement. Knowledge and beliefs about clinical trials may contribute to patient literacy of clinical trials, influencing engagement, enrollment and retention. We developed and assessed a survey that measures clinical trial health knowledge and bel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Alicia, Donley, Tiffany, Hays, Ron D., Robbins, Rebecca, Seixas, Azizi, Jean-Louis, Girardin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148660
_version_ 1784754640770826240
author Chung, Alicia
Donley, Tiffany
Hays, Ron D.
Robbins, Rebecca
Seixas, Azizi
Jean-Louis, Girardin
author_facet Chung, Alicia
Donley, Tiffany
Hays, Ron D.
Robbins, Rebecca
Seixas, Azizi
Jean-Louis, Girardin
author_sort Chung, Alicia
collection PubMed
description Patient health literacy is vital to clinical trial engagement. Knowledge and beliefs about clinical trials may contribute to patient literacy of clinical trials, influencing engagement, enrollment and retention. We developed and assessed a survey that measures clinical trial health knowledge and beliefs, known as the Clinical trial HEalth Knowledge and belief Scale (CHEKS). The 31 survey items in CHEKS represent knowledge and beliefs about clinical trial research (n = 409) in 2017. We examined item-scale correlations for the 31 items, eliminated items with item-scale correlations less than 0.30, and then estimated internal consistency reliability for the remaining 25 items. We used the comparative fit index (CFI) and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) to evaluate model fit. The average age of the sample was 34 (SD = 15.7) and 48% female. We identified 6 of the 31 items that had item-scale correlations (corrected for overlap) lower than 0.30. Coefficient alpha for the remaining 25 items was 0.93 A one-factor categorical confirmatory factor analytic model with 16 correlated errors was not statistically significant (chi-square = 10011.994, df = 300, p < 0.001) but fit the data well (CFI = 0.95 and RMSEA = 0.07). CHEKS can assess clinical trial knowledge and beliefs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9315756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93157562022-07-27 Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS) Chung, Alicia Donley, Tiffany Hays, Ron D. Robbins, Rebecca Seixas, Azizi Jean-Louis, Girardin Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Patient health literacy is vital to clinical trial engagement. Knowledge and beliefs about clinical trials may contribute to patient literacy of clinical trials, influencing engagement, enrollment and retention. We developed and assessed a survey that measures clinical trial health knowledge and beliefs, known as the Clinical trial HEalth Knowledge and belief Scale (CHEKS). The 31 survey items in CHEKS represent knowledge and beliefs about clinical trial research (n = 409) in 2017. We examined item-scale correlations for the 31 items, eliminated items with item-scale correlations less than 0.30, and then estimated internal consistency reliability for the remaining 25 items. We used the comparative fit index (CFI) and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) to evaluate model fit. The average age of the sample was 34 (SD = 15.7) and 48% female. We identified 6 of the 31 items that had item-scale correlations (corrected for overlap) lower than 0.30. Coefficient alpha for the remaining 25 items was 0.93 A one-factor categorical confirmatory factor analytic model with 16 correlated errors was not statistically significant (chi-square = 10011.994, df = 300, p < 0.001) but fit the data well (CFI = 0.95 and RMSEA = 0.07). CHEKS can assess clinical trial knowledge and beliefs. MDPI 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9315756/ /pubmed/35886512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148660 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chung, Alicia
Donley, Tiffany
Hays, Ron D.
Robbins, Rebecca
Seixas, Azizi
Jean-Louis, Girardin
Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS)
title Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS)
title_full Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS)
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS)
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS)
title_short Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS)
title_sort development and evaluation of the clinical trial health knowledge and beliefs scale (cheks)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35886512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148660
work_keys_str_mv AT chungalicia developmentandevaluationoftheclinicaltrialhealthknowledgeandbeliefsscalecheks
AT donleytiffany developmentandevaluationoftheclinicaltrialhealthknowledgeandbeliefsscalecheks
AT haysrond developmentandevaluationoftheclinicaltrialhealthknowledgeandbeliefsscalecheks
AT robbinsrebecca developmentandevaluationoftheclinicaltrialhealthknowledgeandbeliefsscalecheks
AT seixasazizi developmentandevaluationoftheclinicaltrialhealthknowledgeandbeliefsscalecheks
AT jeanlouisgirardin developmentandevaluationoftheclinicaltrialhealthknowledgeandbeliefsscalecheks