Cargando…
Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the diagnostic accuracy of pretest probability of influenza (%) by physicians and the factors affecting the clinical diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-centre observational study. SETTING: A community primary care clinic in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35868823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055910 |
_version_ | 1784754679854399488 |
---|---|
author | Maita, Hiroki Kobayashi, Tadashi Akimoto, Takashi Matsuoka, Fumihiko Funakoshi, Shigeki Osawa, Hiroshi Kato, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Maita, Hiroki Kobayashi, Tadashi Akimoto, Takashi Matsuoka, Fumihiko Funakoshi, Shigeki Osawa, Hiroshi Kato, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Maita, Hiroki |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the diagnostic accuracy of pretest probability of influenza (%) by physicians and the factors affecting the clinical diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-centre observational study. SETTING: A community primary care clinic in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were recruited from a database of studies conducted during the influenza season from December 2017 to April 2019. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Sensitivity and specificity of the physician’s clinical diagnosis of influenza recorded in the medical record as pretest probability. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients (median age, 31 years; male, 66.6%) were analysed in this study. The area under the curve (AUC) of the physician’s pretest probability was 0.77. At a cut-off value of 30%, the sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio were 92.0% (95% CI 86.7 to 95.7) and 0.19 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.33), respectively. At a cut-off value of 80%, the specificity and positive likelihood ratio were 90.8% (95% CI 85.4 to 94.6) and 4.01 (95% CI 2.41 to 6.66), respectively. The AUCs of patients who had and had not taken any medications before visiting the clinic were 0.77 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.85) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.84), respectively. The AUCs of patients with type A and B influenza were 0.78 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.84) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.82), respectively. The AUCs of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients were 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.88) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.89), respectively. The AUC for patients less than 12 hours after onset was 0.69 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.88), and that for patients aged younger than 6 years was 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The physician’s pretest probability of influenza (%) may be useful for both definitive and exclusionary diagnoses within the limits of our study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9315920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93159202022-08-16 Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study Maita, Hiroki Kobayashi, Tadashi Akimoto, Takashi Matsuoka, Fumihiko Funakoshi, Shigeki Osawa, Hiroshi Kato, Hiroyuki BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the diagnostic accuracy of pretest probability of influenza (%) by physicians and the factors affecting the clinical diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-centre observational study. SETTING: A community primary care clinic in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were recruited from a database of studies conducted during the influenza season from December 2017 to April 2019. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Sensitivity and specificity of the physician’s clinical diagnosis of influenza recorded in the medical record as pretest probability. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients (median age, 31 years; male, 66.6%) were analysed in this study. The area under the curve (AUC) of the physician’s pretest probability was 0.77. At a cut-off value of 30%, the sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio were 92.0% (95% CI 86.7 to 95.7) and 0.19 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.33), respectively. At a cut-off value of 80%, the specificity and positive likelihood ratio were 90.8% (95% CI 85.4 to 94.6) and 4.01 (95% CI 2.41 to 6.66), respectively. The AUCs of patients who had and had not taken any medications before visiting the clinic were 0.77 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.85) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.84), respectively. The AUCs of patients with type A and B influenza were 0.78 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.84) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.82), respectively. The AUCs of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients were 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.88) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.89), respectively. The AUC for patients less than 12 hours after onset was 0.69 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.88), and that for patients aged younger than 6 years was 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The physician’s pretest probability of influenza (%) may be useful for both definitive and exclusionary diagnoses within the limits of our study. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9315920/ /pubmed/35868823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055910 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Maita, Hiroki Kobayashi, Tadashi Akimoto, Takashi Matsuoka, Fumihiko Funakoshi, Shigeki Osawa, Hiroshi Kato, Hiroyuki Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study |
title | Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study |
title_full | Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study |
title_short | Clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study |
title_sort | clinical diagnosis of seasonal influenza by physicians: a retrospective observational study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35868823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055910 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maitahiroki clinicaldiagnosisofseasonalinfluenzabyphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT kobayashitadashi clinicaldiagnosisofseasonalinfluenzabyphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT akimototakashi clinicaldiagnosisofseasonalinfluenzabyphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT matsuokafumihiko clinicaldiagnosisofseasonalinfluenzabyphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT funakoshishigeki clinicaldiagnosisofseasonalinfluenzabyphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT osawahiroshi clinicaldiagnosisofseasonalinfluenzabyphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT katohiroyuki clinicaldiagnosisofseasonalinfluenzabyphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy |