Cargando…

N-Phenacyldibromobenzimidazoles—Synthesis Optimization and Evaluation of Their Cytotoxic Activity

Antifungal N-phenacyl derivatives of 4,6- and 5,6-dibromobenzimidazoles are interesting substrates in the synthesis of new antimycotics. Unfortunately, their application is limited by the low synthesis yields and time-consuming separation procedure. In this paper, we present the optimization of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowalkowska, Anna, Chojnacki, Konrad, Multan, Maciej, Maurin, Jan K., Łukowska-Chojnacka, Edyta, Wińska, Patrycja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9315981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35889223
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144349
Descripción
Sumario:Antifungal N-phenacyl derivatives of 4,6- and 5,6-dibromobenzimidazoles are interesting substrates in the synthesis of new antimycotics. Unfortunately, their application is limited by the low synthesis yields and time-consuming separation procedure. In this paper, we present the optimization of the synthesis conditions and purification methods of N-phenacyldibromobenzimidazoles. The reactions were carried out in various base solvent-systems including K(2)CO(3), NaH, KOH, t-BuOK, MeONa, NaHCO(3), Et(3)N, Cs(2)CO(3), DBU, DIPEA, or DABCO as a base, and MeCN, DMF, THF, DMSO, or dioxane as a solvent. The progress of the reaction was monitored using HPLC analysis. The best results were reached when the reactions were carried out in an NaHCO(3)–MeCN system at reflux for 24 h. Additionally, the cytotoxic activity of the synthesized compounds against MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), A-549 (lung adenocarcinoma), CCRF-CEM (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), and MRC-5 (normal lung fibroblasts) was evaluated. We observed that the studied cell lines differed in sensitivity to the tested compounds with MCF-7 cells being the most sensitive, while A-549 cells were the least sensitive. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of the tested derivatives towards CCRF-CEM cells increased with the number of chlorine or fluorine substituents. Furthermore, some of the active compounds, i.e., 2-(5,6-dibromo-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)-1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethanone (4f), 2-(4,6-dibromo-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)-1-(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)ethanone (5g), and 2-(4,6-dibromo-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)-1-(2,4,6-trifluorophenyl)ethanone (5j) demonstrated pro-apoptotic properties against leukemic cells with derivative 5g being the most effective.