Cargando…
A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels
This review discusses the most commonly employed methods for determining pore size and pore size distribution in bioaerogels. Aerogels are materials with high porosity and large surface areas. Most of their pores are in the range of mesopores, between 2 and 50 nm. They often have smaller or larger p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels8070438 |
_version_ | 1784754809549619200 |
---|---|
author | Horvat, Gabrijela Pantić, Milica Knez, Željko Novak, Zoran |
author_facet | Horvat, Gabrijela Pantić, Milica Knez, Željko Novak, Zoran |
author_sort | Horvat, Gabrijela |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review discusses the most commonly employed methods for determining pore size and pore size distribution in bioaerogels. Aerogels are materials with high porosity and large surface areas. Most of their pores are in the range of mesopores, between 2 and 50 nm. They often have smaller or larger pores, which presents a significant challenge in determining the exact mean pore size and pore size distribution in such materials. The precision and actual value of the pore size are of considerable importance since pore size and pore size distribution are among the main properties of aerogels and are often directly connected with the final application of those materials. However, many recently published papers discuss or present pore size as one of the essential achievements despite the misinterpretation or the wrong assignments of pore size determination. This review will help future research and publications evaluate the pore size of aerogels more precisely and discuss it correctly. The study covers methods such as gas adsorption, from which BJH and DFT models are often used, SEM, mercury porosimetry, and thermoporometry. The methods are described, and the results obtained are discussed. The following paper shows that there is still no precise method for determining pore size distribution or mean pore size in aerogels until now. Knowing that, it is expected that this field will evolve in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9316429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93164292022-07-27 A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels Horvat, Gabrijela Pantić, Milica Knez, Željko Novak, Zoran Gels Review This review discusses the most commonly employed methods for determining pore size and pore size distribution in bioaerogels. Aerogels are materials with high porosity and large surface areas. Most of their pores are in the range of mesopores, between 2 and 50 nm. They often have smaller or larger pores, which presents a significant challenge in determining the exact mean pore size and pore size distribution in such materials. The precision and actual value of the pore size are of considerable importance since pore size and pore size distribution are among the main properties of aerogels and are often directly connected with the final application of those materials. However, many recently published papers discuss or present pore size as one of the essential achievements despite the misinterpretation or the wrong assignments of pore size determination. This review will help future research and publications evaluate the pore size of aerogels more precisely and discuss it correctly. The study covers methods such as gas adsorption, from which BJH and DFT models are often used, SEM, mercury porosimetry, and thermoporometry. The methods are described, and the results obtained are discussed. The following paper shows that there is still no precise method for determining pore size distribution or mean pore size in aerogels until now. Knowing that, it is expected that this field will evolve in the future. MDPI 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9316429/ /pubmed/35877523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels8070438 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Horvat, Gabrijela Pantić, Milica Knez, Željko Novak, Zoran A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels |
title | A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels |
title_full | A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels |
title_fullStr | A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels |
title_full_unstemmed | A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels |
title_short | A Brief Evaluation of Pore Structure Determination for Bioaerogels |
title_sort | brief evaluation of pore structure determination for bioaerogels |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels8070438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horvatgabrijela abriefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels AT panticmilica abriefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels AT knezzeljko abriefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels AT novakzoran abriefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels AT horvatgabrijela briefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels AT panticmilica briefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels AT knezzeljko briefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels AT novakzoran briefevaluationofporestructuredeterminationforbioaerogels |