Cargando…
The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study
Background: This study investigates the effects of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, tube voltage, and phantom positioning (supine and prone) on computed tomography (CT) numbers and radiation dose. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a Discovery CT750 HD—128 slice (GE Hea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8070175 |
_version_ | 1784754811989655552 |
---|---|
author | Al-Hayek, Yazan Spuur, Kelly Davidson, Rob Hayre, Christopher Zheng, Xiaoming |
author_facet | Al-Hayek, Yazan Spuur, Kelly Davidson, Rob Hayre, Christopher Zheng, Xiaoming |
author_sort | Al-Hayek, Yazan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This study investigates the effects of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, tube voltage, and phantom positioning (supine and prone) on computed tomography (CT) numbers and radiation dose. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a Discovery CT750 HD—128 slice (GE Healthcare) scanner at different tube voltages (80, 120, and 140 kVp). Images employing 0° and 180° localisers were acquired in supine and prone positions for each vertical off-centring (±100, ±60, and ±30 mm from the iso-centre). CT numbers and displayed volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded. The relationship between dose variation and CT number was investigated. Results: The maximum changes in CT number between the two phantom positions as a function of vertical-off-centring were for the upper thorax 34 HU (0° localiser, 120 kVp), mid thorax 43 HU (180° localiser, 80 kVp), and for the abdominal section 31 HU (0° localiser, 80 kVp) in the prone position. A strong positive correlation was reported between the variation in dose and CT number (r = 0.969, p < 0.001); 95% CI (0.93, 0.99). Conclusions: Patient positioning demands an approach with a high degree of accuracy, especially in cases where clinical decisions depend on CT number accuracy for tissue lesion characterisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9316438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93164382022-07-27 The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study Al-Hayek, Yazan Spuur, Kelly Davidson, Rob Hayre, Christopher Zheng, Xiaoming J Imaging Article Background: This study investigates the effects of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, tube voltage, and phantom positioning (supine and prone) on computed tomography (CT) numbers and radiation dose. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a Discovery CT750 HD—128 slice (GE Healthcare) scanner at different tube voltages (80, 120, and 140 kVp). Images employing 0° and 180° localisers were acquired in supine and prone positions for each vertical off-centring (±100, ±60, and ±30 mm from the iso-centre). CT numbers and displayed volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded. The relationship between dose variation and CT number was investigated. Results: The maximum changes in CT number between the two phantom positions as a function of vertical-off-centring were for the upper thorax 34 HU (0° localiser, 120 kVp), mid thorax 43 HU (180° localiser, 80 kVp), and for the abdominal section 31 HU (0° localiser, 80 kVp) in the prone position. A strong positive correlation was reported between the variation in dose and CT number (r = 0.969, p < 0.001); 95% CI (0.93, 0.99). Conclusions: Patient positioning demands an approach with a high degree of accuracy, especially in cases where clinical decisions depend on CT number accuracy for tissue lesion characterisation. MDPI 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9316438/ /pubmed/35877619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8070175 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Al-Hayek, Yazan Spuur, Kelly Davidson, Rob Hayre, Christopher Zheng, Xiaoming The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study |
title | The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study |
title_full | The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study |
title_fullStr | The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study |
title_short | The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study |
title_sort | impacts of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, phantom positioning and tube voltage on ct number accuracy: an experimental study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8070175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alhayekyazan theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT spuurkelly theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT davidsonrob theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT hayrechristopher theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT zhengxiaoming theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT alhayekyazan impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT spuurkelly impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT davidsonrob impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT hayrechristopher impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy AT zhengxiaoming impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy |