Cargando…

The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study

Background: This study investigates the effects of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, tube voltage, and phantom positioning (supine and prone) on computed tomography (CT) numbers and radiation dose. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a Discovery CT750 HD—128 slice (GE Hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Hayek, Yazan, Spuur, Kelly, Davidson, Rob, Hayre, Christopher, Zheng, Xiaoming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877619
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8070175
_version_ 1784754811989655552
author Al-Hayek, Yazan
Spuur, Kelly
Davidson, Rob
Hayre, Christopher
Zheng, Xiaoming
author_facet Al-Hayek, Yazan
Spuur, Kelly
Davidson, Rob
Hayre, Christopher
Zheng, Xiaoming
author_sort Al-Hayek, Yazan
collection PubMed
description Background: This study investigates the effects of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, tube voltage, and phantom positioning (supine and prone) on computed tomography (CT) numbers and radiation dose. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a Discovery CT750 HD—128 slice (GE Healthcare) scanner at different tube voltages (80, 120, and 140 kVp). Images employing 0° and 180° localisers were acquired in supine and prone positions for each vertical off-centring (±100, ±60, and ±30 mm from the iso-centre). CT numbers and displayed volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded. The relationship between dose variation and CT number was investigated. Results: The maximum changes in CT number between the two phantom positions as a function of vertical-off-centring were for the upper thorax 34 HU (0° localiser, 120 kVp), mid thorax 43 HU (180° localiser, 80 kVp), and for the abdominal section 31 HU (0° localiser, 80 kVp) in the prone position. A strong positive correlation was reported between the variation in dose and CT number (r = 0.969, p < 0.001); 95% CI (0.93, 0.99). Conclusions: Patient positioning demands an approach with a high degree of accuracy, especially in cases where clinical decisions depend on CT number accuracy for tissue lesion characterisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9316438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93164382022-07-27 The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study Al-Hayek, Yazan Spuur, Kelly Davidson, Rob Hayre, Christopher Zheng, Xiaoming J Imaging Article Background: This study investigates the effects of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, tube voltage, and phantom positioning (supine and prone) on computed tomography (CT) numbers and radiation dose. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a Discovery CT750 HD—128 slice (GE Healthcare) scanner at different tube voltages (80, 120, and 140 kVp). Images employing 0° and 180° localisers were acquired in supine and prone positions for each vertical off-centring (±100, ±60, and ±30 mm from the iso-centre). CT numbers and displayed volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded. The relationship between dose variation and CT number was investigated. Results: The maximum changes in CT number between the two phantom positions as a function of vertical-off-centring were for the upper thorax 34 HU (0° localiser, 120 kVp), mid thorax 43 HU (180° localiser, 80 kVp), and for the abdominal section 31 HU (0° localiser, 80 kVp) in the prone position. A strong positive correlation was reported between the variation in dose and CT number (r = 0.969, p < 0.001); 95% CI (0.93, 0.99). Conclusions: Patient positioning demands an approach with a high degree of accuracy, especially in cases where clinical decisions depend on CT number accuracy for tissue lesion characterisation. MDPI 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9316438/ /pubmed/35877619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8070175 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Al-Hayek, Yazan
Spuur, Kelly
Davidson, Rob
Hayre, Christopher
Zheng, Xiaoming
The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study
title The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study
title_full The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study
title_fullStr The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study
title_short The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study
title_sort impacts of vertical off-centring, localiser direction, phantom positioning and tube voltage on ct number accuracy: an experimental study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35877619
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8070175
work_keys_str_mv AT alhayekyazan theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT spuurkelly theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT davidsonrob theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT hayrechristopher theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT zhengxiaoming theimpactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT alhayekyazan impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT spuurkelly impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT davidsonrob impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT hayrechristopher impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy
AT zhengxiaoming impactsofverticaloffcentringlocaliserdirectionphantompositioningandtubevoltageonctnumberaccuracyanexperimentalstudy