Cargando…

Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior lumbar spine fusion surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain necessitating a multimodal analgesic regime. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic is an accepted modality for postoperative analgesia in spine surgeries. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavithran, Priyanka, Sudarshan, Pramod K., Eliyas, Salin, Sekhar, Biju, Kaniachallil, Kishore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903596
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1054_21
_version_ 1784754873920651264
author Pavithran, Priyanka
Sudarshan, Pramod K.
Eliyas, Salin
Sekhar, Biju
Kaniachallil, Kishore
author_facet Pavithran, Priyanka
Sudarshan, Pramod K.
Eliyas, Salin
Sekhar, Biju
Kaniachallil, Kishore
author_sort Pavithran, Priyanka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior lumbar spine fusion surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain necessitating a multimodal analgesic regime. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic is an accepted modality for postoperative analgesia in spine surgeries. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel technique being evaluated for providing analgesia in lumbar spine surgeries. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of TLIP block compared to that of wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in terms of time to request the first dose of rescue analgesic. METHODS: Seventy-one patients scheduled for posterior lumbar spine fusion under general anaesthesia were included in this double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Preoperatively, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a TLIP block (TLIP group) or wound infiltration (LI group). The primary endpoint was the time of the first request for rescue analgesia. Secondary endpoints were the total tramadol consumption and pain and comfort scores measured at various time points in the 48-h postoperative period. The trial was terminated after second interim analysis as the analgesic benefit of TLIP was evident both clinically and statistically. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) duration of the time of the first request for rescue analgesia was 1440 (1290, 2280) min in the TLIP group and 340 (180, 360) min in the infiltration group; P value <.001. The mean tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the infiltration group compared to the TLIP group, with a P value <.001. CONCLUSION: TLIP block provided better postoperative analgesia than that provided by wound infiltration with local anaesthetic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9316676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93166762022-07-27 Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial Pavithran, Priyanka Sudarshan, Pramod K. Eliyas, Salin Sekhar, Biju Kaniachallil, Kishore Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior lumbar spine fusion surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain necessitating a multimodal analgesic regime. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic is an accepted modality for postoperative analgesia in spine surgeries. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel technique being evaluated for providing analgesia in lumbar spine surgeries. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of TLIP block compared to that of wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in terms of time to request the first dose of rescue analgesic. METHODS: Seventy-one patients scheduled for posterior lumbar spine fusion under general anaesthesia were included in this double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Preoperatively, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a TLIP block (TLIP group) or wound infiltration (LI group). The primary endpoint was the time of the first request for rescue analgesia. Secondary endpoints were the total tramadol consumption and pain and comfort scores measured at various time points in the 48-h postoperative period. The trial was terminated after second interim analysis as the analgesic benefit of TLIP was evident both clinically and statistically. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) duration of the time of the first request for rescue analgesia was 1440 (1290, 2280) min in the TLIP group and 340 (180, 360) min in the infiltration group; P value <.001. The mean tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the infiltration group compared to the TLIP group, with a P value <.001. CONCLUSION: TLIP block provided better postoperative analgesia than that provided by wound infiltration with local anaesthetic. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-06 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9316676/ /pubmed/35903596 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1054_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pavithran, Priyanka
Sudarshan, Pramod K.
Eliyas, Salin
Sekhar, Biju
Kaniachallil, Kishore
Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – a prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903596
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1054_21
work_keys_str_mv AT pavithranpriyanka comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sudarshanpramodk comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eliyassalin comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sekharbiju comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kaniachallilkishore comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial