Cargando…
Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior lumbar spine fusion surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain necessitating a multimodal analgesic regime. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic is an accepted modality for postoperative analgesia in spine surgeries. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903596 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1054_21 |
_version_ | 1784754873920651264 |
---|---|
author | Pavithran, Priyanka Sudarshan, Pramod K. Eliyas, Salin Sekhar, Biju Kaniachallil, Kishore |
author_facet | Pavithran, Priyanka Sudarshan, Pramod K. Eliyas, Salin Sekhar, Biju Kaniachallil, Kishore |
author_sort | Pavithran, Priyanka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior lumbar spine fusion surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain necessitating a multimodal analgesic regime. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic is an accepted modality for postoperative analgesia in spine surgeries. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel technique being evaluated for providing analgesia in lumbar spine surgeries. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of TLIP block compared to that of wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in terms of time to request the first dose of rescue analgesic. METHODS: Seventy-one patients scheduled for posterior lumbar spine fusion under general anaesthesia were included in this double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Preoperatively, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a TLIP block (TLIP group) or wound infiltration (LI group). The primary endpoint was the time of the first request for rescue analgesia. Secondary endpoints were the total tramadol consumption and pain and comfort scores measured at various time points in the 48-h postoperative period. The trial was terminated after second interim analysis as the analgesic benefit of TLIP was evident both clinically and statistically. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) duration of the time of the first request for rescue analgesia was 1440 (1290, 2280) min in the TLIP group and 340 (180, 360) min in the infiltration group; P value <.001. The mean tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the infiltration group compared to the TLIP group, with a P value <.001. CONCLUSION: TLIP block provided better postoperative analgesia than that provided by wound infiltration with local anaesthetic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9316676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93166762022-07-27 Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial Pavithran, Priyanka Sudarshan, Pramod K. Eliyas, Salin Sekhar, Biju Kaniachallil, Kishore Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Posterior lumbar spine fusion surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain necessitating a multimodal analgesic regime. Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic is an accepted modality for postoperative analgesia in spine surgeries. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a novel technique being evaluated for providing analgesia in lumbar spine surgeries. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of TLIP block compared to that of wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in terms of time to request the first dose of rescue analgesic. METHODS: Seventy-one patients scheduled for posterior lumbar spine fusion under general anaesthesia were included in this double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Preoperatively, patients were randomly allocated to receive either a TLIP block (TLIP group) or wound infiltration (LI group). The primary endpoint was the time of the first request for rescue analgesia. Secondary endpoints were the total tramadol consumption and pain and comfort scores measured at various time points in the 48-h postoperative period. The trial was terminated after second interim analysis as the analgesic benefit of TLIP was evident both clinically and statistically. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) duration of the time of the first request for rescue analgesia was 1440 (1290, 2280) min in the TLIP group and 340 (180, 360) min in the infiltration group; P value <.001. The mean tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the infiltration group compared to the TLIP group, with a P value <.001. CONCLUSION: TLIP block provided better postoperative analgesia than that provided by wound infiltration with local anaesthetic. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-06 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9316676/ /pubmed/35903596 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1054_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pavithran, Priyanka Sudarshan, Pramod K. Eliyas, Salin Sekhar, Biju Kaniachallil, Kishore Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial |
title | Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with local anaesthetic infiltration in lumbar spine surgeries – a prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9316676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903596 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1054_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavithranpriyanka comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sudarshanpramodk comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT eliyassalin comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sekharbiju comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kaniachallilkishore comparisonofthoracolumbarinterfascialplaneblockwithlocalanaestheticinfiltrationinlumbarspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial |